Assesing the Impact of Digital Technologies on Governance Policies for Food Security: A Case Study of Indonesia
Abstract
Food security has emerged as a crucial priority for the Indonesian government, as highlighted in Indonesia’s ASEAN chairmanship in 2023. This study explores the implications of digital transformation on food security in Indonesia using a literature review method. Previous studies have shown the importance of technology adoption in agriculture and the potential benefits it offers to improve productivity and access to market information. The results showed a positive trend in food security in Indonesia, potentially influenced by the ongoing digital transformation of the agricultural and food sectors. Furthermore, this study analyzes the implications of the area of harvested land, productivity per hectare, and total production on food security. The data indicated that the harvested land area remained relatively stable over the years, with minor fluctuations. Total production showed consistent stability, whereas productivity per hectare steadily increased. This study also analyzed the food security index based on three aspects: availability, access, and consumption of food. Continuous monitoring and evaluation of digital initiatives are essential to track progress and inform evidencebased decision making.
Keywords: digital transformation, food security, food security index
References
[1] FAO. World food summit: Rome declaration on world food security and the world food summit plan of action. FAO. 1996.
[2] Ningrum et Al. Pemuda dan Pertanian Berkelanjutan, Dependensi, Strategi, dan Otonomi. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan. 2007.
[3] Arnawi A. Memaknai Kembali Ketahanan Pangan. Jurnal Ketahanan Nasional. 2009;14(1):77–87.
[4] Wibowo ET. Wibowo. Pembangunan Ekonomi Pertanian Digital dalam Mendukung Ketahanan Pangan (Studi di Kabupaten Sleman: Dinas Pertanian, Pangan, dan Perikanan, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Jurnal Ketahanan Nasional. 2020;26(2):204–28.
[5] Biancone P, Secinaro S, Kamal M. Crowdfunding and fintech: Business model compliant with Sharia. Crowdfunding and fintech business model Sharia compliant. 2019;12:1–10.
[6] Elseidi RL. Determinate of halal purchasing intentions. Evidence from the UK . 2018;9(1):167–190.
[7] Nurhadi S. Strategi Pengembangan Ketahanan Pangan (Studi di Kabupaten Bantul Propinsi DIY, Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada. 2010.
[8] Jaya PH. Jaya. Nasib Petani dan ketahanan Pangan Wilayah (Studi Tentang Kebijakan Pemerintah dan Respons Masyarakat, Desa Muldodadi, Bantul ketika Harga Komoditas Pertanian Naik. Jurnal Ketahanan Nasional. 2018;24(1):77–93.
[9] Fatchiya A, Amanah S, Kusumastuti YI. Penerapan Inovasi Teknologi Pertanian dan Hubungannya dengan Ketahanan Pangan Rumah Tangga Petani. Jurnal Penyuluhan. 2016;12(2):190–197.
[10] Afifah AN. Penerapan Digital Marketing dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Keberhasilan Usaha Mikro, Kecil dan Menengah Sektor Kreatif di Indonesia dan Malaysia. Tesis. 2018.
[11] Lubis. Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi Mendukung Pembangunan Pertanian Berkelanjutan. Prosiding Seminar. 2010.
[12] Warr P. Food security vs. food self-sufficiency: The Indonesian case. The Amdt- Corden Department of Economics, Crawford School of Economics, and Government. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1910356
[13] Rahim A, Supardi S, Hastuti D. Model Anlysis Ekonomi Pertanian, Makassar: Badan Penerbit Universitas Negeri Makassar. 2012.
[14] Subejo. Akses, Penggunaan dan Faktor Penentu Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi Pada Kawasan Pertanian Komersial Untuk Mendukung Ketahanan Pangan di Perdesaan Yogyakarta. Jurnal Ketahanan Nasional. 2018;24(1).
[15] Kementan. Indeks Ketahanan Pangan Indonesia 2018. Badan Ketahanan Pangan Kementerian Pertanian. 2018.
[16] Rachmaningsih T, Priyarsono DS. Ketahanan Pangan di Kawasan Timur Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Indonesia. 2012;13(1):1- 18 https://doi.org/10.21002/jepi.v13i1.225
[17] Soekirman KP. Konsep, Kebijaksanaan dan Pelaksanaannya. Yogyakarta: Lokakarya Ketahanan Pangan Rumah Tangga. 1998.