Collaborative Governance in the Development of Silk Commodities in South Sulawesi
This study departs from the fact that the silk sector in South Sulawesi is currently experiencing a decline, even though it is closely attached to the culture of the people of South Sulawesi and has broad and varied potential benefits. Silk has also become a priority sector in the provincial government’s development planning. In recent years, collaborative governance has become a concept that has been in great demand by academics. Collaborative governance has emerged to respond to implementation failures, high costs, and the politicization of public sector regulations. The focus is on each stage of public policy. It is a new paradigm to understand the existence of multiple stakeholders in public affairs. This study aimed to explain collaborative governance in the development of silk commodities in South Sulawesi, and case studies were used to analyze such models. I used a post-positivist research paradigm with qualitative methods. The government’s efforts to develop the silk commodity in South Sulawesi by implementing a collaborative governance process have shown results that have not been maximized in the upstream, manufacturing, and downstream sectors, which are still dominated by entrepreneurs. Therefore, the government’s role is needed to formulate policies that are more effective and capable of developing good collaboration with the public sector and society.
Keywords: collaborative governance, silk commodity
 Ridwan. Laporan Akhir Fasilitasi Penelitian Persutraan Alam di Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan. Makassar: Dinas Kehutanan Sulawesi Selatan. 2011.
 BP Alam. Selayang Pandang Balai Persutraan Alam, Gowa: Departemen Kehutanan Direktorat Jenderal Rehabilitas Lahan dan Perhutanan Sosial. 2010.
 Maturidy AF. Preferensi Pelaku Usaha dalam Pengembangan Persutraan Alam di Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan. E-Jurnal Program Pascasarana Universitas Hasanuddin; 2011:1–11.
 Donahue JD, Zeckhauser and J Richard. Collborative governance: Private roles for public goals in turbulent times. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400838103
 Ansell C, Gash A. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2008;18(4):543–71.
 Sudarmo, Isu-isu Administrasi Publik dalam Perspektif Governance. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret; 2011.
 Van Oortmerssen LA, Van Woerkum CM, Aarts N. When interaction flows: An exploration of collective creative processes on a collaborative board. Group Organ Manage. 2015;40(4):500–28.
 Provan KG, Kenis P. Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2008;18(2):229–52.
 Osborne SP. New public governance? Emerging perspective on the theory and practice of public governance. New York: Routledge; https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203861684
 Emmerson KN, Balogh S. Integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2011;22(1):1–29.
 Martin, Currie G, Finn R. Leadership, service reform, and public service networks: The case of cancer genetics pilots in the English NHS. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2008;19(4):769–94.
 Johnston. Management of the inclusion process in collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2010;21:699–721.
 Yong-Duck J, Daniel M, Shui-Yan T. Collaborative governance in the United States and Korea: Cases in negotiated policymaking and service delivery. International Review of Public Administration. 2009;13(1):1–11.
 Cline KD. Defining the implementation problem: Organizational management versus cooperation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2000;10(3):551– 71.
 Norris-Tirrel D, Clay JA. Strategic collaboration in public and nonprofit administration: A practice-based approach to solving shared problems. Francis. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420088762
 Lee SY, Whitford AB. Assessing the effects of organizational resources on public agency performance: Evidence from the US Federal Government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2013;23(3):687–712.