An Analysis of the Management Practice Using Organizational Metaphor Theory
Abstract
Analysis of the organization becomes necessary when the organization shows certain phenomena such as performance decreasing or increasing sharply, organizations structural changes, organizational climate is not conducive, the number of employee changes, and so on. This study explores the implementation of Morgan’s Organizational Metaphor Theory in the management practice within a private higher education institution in Jakarta. This study helps to interpret the advancements and barriers in the current management practice. This study uses a qualitative research method with a case study approach. Some analyses were made based on the eight metaphors about organizations according to Morgan, namely the metaphor of the organization 1) as a machine, 2) as an organism, 3) as the brain, 4) as culture, 5) as a political system, 6) as a physical prison, 7) as a dynamic and transforming reality, and 8) as an instrument of domination. The results show that the institutions should strive to make some important changes in their management practice, especially by applying the recent management practices, including treating lecturers and staff as partners. This study implies that the implementation of modern management must be accompanied by the leadership.
Keywords: organizational metaphor theory, modern management, leadership commitment
References
[1] Nandasinghe G. Leadership and organization performance: A review on theoretical and empirical perspectives. Global Journal of Management and Business Research. 2020;20( July):25–30.
[2] Rosenbaum D, More E, Steane P. Planned organisational change management: Forward to the past? An exploratory literature review. Journal of Organizational Change Management. 2018;31(2):286–303.
[3] O’Donnell O, Boyle R. Understanding and managing organisational culture. Institute of Public Administration. 2008. p. 1–109.
[4] Sun S. Organizational culture and its themes. International Journal of Business and Management. 2009;3(12):137–141.
[5] Widiana ME, Sutarso ME. The role of organizational commitment and leadership on performance in shipping company. Academy of Strategic Management Journal 2022;21(S1):1–13.
[6] KBBI. kamus besar bahasa indonesia (KBBI). 2020.
[7] Creswell JW. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method. 4th Edi. Knigh V, Young J, Koscielak K, Bauhaus B, editor. Vol. Fourth Edi, SAGE. Singaopre: SAGE; 2014. p.1–342.
[8] Kamasak R, Kar A, Yavuz M, Baykut S. Qualitative methods in organizational research: An example of grounded theory data analysis. Handbook of Research on Organizational Culture and Diversity in the Modern Workforce. 2017;(March):23–42.
[9] Wilhelmy A, Köhler T. Qualitative research in work and organizational psychology journals: practices and future opportunities. European Journal of Work and Organisational Psychology. 2022;31(2):161–185.
[10] Le TT, Le BP. Mediating role of change capability in the relationship between transformational leadership and organizational performance: An empirical research. Psychology Research and Behavior Management. 2021;14:1747–1759.
[11] Morgan G. Images of organization. Thousand Oaks : Sage; 2006.
[12] Tohidian I, Rahimian H. Bringing Morgan’s metaphors in organization contexts: An essay review. Cogent Business & Management. 2019.
[13] Takala T. Tacit and explicit knowledge from the point of learning processes - Sketching critical approach. Problems and Perspectives in Management. 2008;6(3):64–74.
[14] Denzin NK. Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2012;6(2):80–88.
[15] Tampubolon MP. Manajemen Perubahan : Individu, Tim Kerja, Organisasi. 1st ed. Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media; 2020.
[16] Kenny SV. Employee productivity and organizational performance: A Theoretical Perspective. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. 2019;(93294):1–11.
[17] Walker R. Communication perspectives on organizational culture and organizational identification. International Journal of Business Communication. 2021;58(2):147–151.
[18] Aranki DH, Suifan TS, Sweis RJ. The relationship between organizational culture and organizational commitment. Modern Applied Science. 2019;13(4):137.