Productivity of Learning Management System in Organizational Development by Utilizing Smart Education

Abstract

This study aims to describe the productivity of the learning management system in the context of organizational development by utilizing intelligent education that applies the latest technological innovations. The researcher uses a qualitative method with a descriptive approach, which will be the focus of the research, followed by interviews and observations, and qualitative data analysis such as manipulation and interpretation techniques that are related to a wider range. There are four research results, including (a) Learning management system as a lecture material platform; (b) Learning management system as assignment submission platform; (c) Learning management system as a discussion forum platform; and (d) Learning management system as a college exam platform.


Keywords: learning management system, organizational development, smart education, educational management

References
[1] AlJarrah A, Thomas MK, Shehab M. Investigating temporal access in a flipped classroom: Procrastination persists. Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 2018;15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0083-9

[2] Almoeather R. Effectiveness of blackboard and edmodo in self-regulated learning and educational satisfaction. Turkish Online J Dist Educ. 2020;21(2). https://doi.org/10.17718/TOJDE.728140

[3] Arras P, Tabunshchyk G. Implementation of digital twins for industry 4.0 in the engineering study program. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91327-4_65

[4] Azmi Murad MA, Shah Jahan AF, Mohd Sharef N, Ab Jalil H, Ismail IA, Mohd Noor MZ. An analytics dashboard for personalised e-learning: A preliminary study. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 835. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8515- 6_65

[5] Bavaresco MV, D’Oca S, Ghisi E, Lamberts R. Methods used in social sciences that suit energy research: A literature review on qualitative methods to assess the human dimension of energy use in buildings. In Energy and Buildings (Vol. 209). 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109702

[6] Bhadri GN, Patil LR. Blended learning: An effective approach for online teaching and learning. J Eng Educ Transform (Vol. 35, Issue Special issue). 2022. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2022/v35is1/22008

[7] Busetto L, Wick W, Gumbinger C. How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological Research and Practice. 2020;2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466- 020-00059-z

[8] Campos P, Luceño L, Aguirre C. Physical spaces in higher education as scenarios of learning innovation: Compositional and formative synergies among architecture, music, and fashion. Eur J Invest Health, Psychol Educ. 2021;11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe11040086

[9] Chacon-Rivas M, Garita C. A successful OSS adaptation and integration in an elearning platform: TEC digital. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. 2014. p. 427. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55128-4_19

[10] Coccoli M, Guercio A, Maresca P, Stanganelli L. Smarter universities: A vision for the fast changing digital era. J Visual Lang Comput. 2014;25(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2014.09.007

[11] Darvin A, Kosasih J, Stefanus, Hanafiah N. Usability evaluation of learning management system. Proceedings of 2021 1st International Conference on Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, ICCSAI 2021. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSAI53272.2021.9609730

[12] Fathema N, Shannon D, Ross M. Expanding the technology acceptance model (TAM) to examine faculty use of learning management systems (LMSs) in higher education institutions. J Online Learn Teach. 2015;11(2).

[13] Gomes JGC, Okano MT, Simões EA, Otola I. MANAGEMENT STRATEGY AND BUSINESS MODELS IN THE ERA OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION. South Am Dev Soc J. 2019;5(14). https://doi.org/10.24325/issn.2446-5763.v5i14p252-270

[14] Habib MN, Jamal W, Khalil U, Khan Z. Transforming universities in interactive digital platform: Case of city university of science and information technology. Educ Inform Technol. 2021;26(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10237-w

[15] Hamilton AB, Finley EP. Qualitative methods in implementation research: An introduction. Psychiatr Res. 2019. p. 280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112516

[16] He Q, Meadows M, Angwin D, Gomes E, Child J. Strategic alliance research in the era of digital transformation: Perspectives on future research. Brit J Manage. 2020;31(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12406

[17] Idris NRAB, Sirat M, Da Wan C. Toward sustainable islamic communities in Malaysia: The role of islamic-based higher education institutions (IHEIs). In Education in the Asia-Pacific Region (Vol. 49), 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6532-4_3

[18] Ilham Apriliyanti M, Handriana T, Usman I. Analysis audit information technology: Green technology, smart system and innovation behavior working for improving business services university in Indonesia (Case Study: UIN Surabaya and UIN Malang). Library Philosophy and Practice, 2020.

[19] Khaerunnisa E, Rafianti I, Pamungkas AS, Pujiastuti H, Setiani Y. Development of a content management system (CMS) for mathematics learning tools of mathematics pre service teachers. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA. 2019;9(2). https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v9i2.2978

[20] Kwangmuang P, Jarutkamolpong S, Sangboonraung W, Daungtod S. The development of learning innovation to enhance higher order thinking skills for students in Thailand junior high schools. Heliyon. 2021;7(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07309

[21] LaMarre A, Chamberlain K. Innovating qualitative research methods: Proposals and possibilities. Methods in Psychology. 2022;6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2021.100083

[22] Loncar M, Barrett NE, Liu GZ. Towards the refinement of forum and asynchronous online discussion in educational contexts worldwide: Trends and investigative approaches within a dominant research paradigm. Computers and Education. 2014, 73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.12.007

[23] Mansor NA, Abdullah N, Rahman HA. Towards electronic learning features in education 4.0 environment: Literature study. Indonesian J Elect Eng Comp Sci. 2020;19(1). https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v19.i1.pp442-450

[24] Martínez-Cerdá JF, Torrent-Sellens J, González-González I. Socio-technical elearning innovation and ways of learning in the ICT-space-time continuum to improve the employability skills of adults. Computers in Human Behavior. 2020;107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.10.019

[25] Naskar D, Hasan N, Das AK. Pattern of social media engagements by the learners of a library and information science mooc course: An analytical study. Annals of Library and Information Studies. 2021;68(1). https://doi.org/10.56042/alis.v68i1.38038

[26] Padgett DK. Qualitative methods in social work research. SAGE Sourcebooks for the Human Services; 2017.

[27] Ratnawati N, Idris. Improving student capabilities through research-based learning innovation on E-learning system. Int J Emerging Technol Learn. 2020;15(4). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i04.11820

[28] Reimann T, Liedl R, Schellhammer KS. Using blended learning to redesign a groundwater management lecture series: benefits and outcome. Grundwasser. 2019;24(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00767-019-00424-z

[29] Rombaoa JSJ. The cost of technology integration on Filipino families with children enrolled in public schools. Asia Pacific Education Review. 2019;20(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09597-x

[30] Roulston K, Halpin SN. Students’ interactions in online asynchronous discussions in qualitative research methods coursework. Int J Social Res Method. 2021;24(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1766773

[31] Shida N, Osman S, Abdullah AH. Students’ perceptions of the use of asynchronous discussion forums, quizzes, and uploaded resources. Int J Recent Technol Eng. 2019;8(2 Special Issue 9). https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.B1146.0982S919

[32] Snelson C. Teaching qualitative research methods online: A scoping review of the literature. Qualitative Report. 2019;24(11). https://doi.org/10.46743/2160- 3715/2019.4021

[33] Songkram N, Songkram N, Chootongchai S, Samanakupt T. Developing students’ learning and innovation skills using the virtual smart classroom. Int J Emerg Technol Learn. 2021;16(4). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i04.15221

[34] Stalljohann P. An open-ended assessment platform in a hosted e-learning Portal. CSEDU 2011 - Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computer Supported Education. 2011;2. https://doi.org/10.5220/0003474503920401

[35] Szajnfarber Z, Gralla E. Qualitative methods for engineering systems: Why we need them and how to use them. Systems Engineering. 2017;20(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21412

[36] Theresiawati Seta HB, Hidayanto AN, Abidin Z. Variables affecting e-learning services quality in Indonesian higher education: Students’ perspectives. J Inform Technol Educ: Res. 2020;19. https://doi.org/10.28945/4489

[37] Zaaruka S, Mosha M. Learners’ communication tools preference -a comparison between institutional learning management systems and instant messaging. EDULEARN19 Proceedings. 2019;1. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2019.0777

[38] Zaballos A, Briones A, Massa A, Centelles P, Caballero V. A smart campus’ digital twin for sustainable comfort monitoring. Sustainability (Switzerland). 2020;12(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219196