Download fulltext HTML
Smith, G., ., S., & ., P. (2023). Diagnosis of Physical Education Teachers Welcoming Industry 5.0 Using the TDC Method. KnE Social Sciences, 8(10), 171–177. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i10.13443

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i10.13443

statistics

  • 81 Abstract Views
  • 99 PDF Views
  • 0 HTML Views

authors

  • George Smith

    George Smith

    School of Education, University of Oxford Oxford OX1 2JD, United Kingdom
  • Saputro .

    Saputro .

    Pascasarjana Progam PPG, UM, Malang
  • Primajaya .

    Primajaya .

    Pascasarjana Progam PPG, UM, Malang

Published Date

  • Jun 5, 2023

Diagnosis of Physical Education Teachers Welcoming Industry 5.0 Using the TDC Method

KnE Social Sciences / International Conference on Innovation and Teacher Professionalism 2022 (ICITEP) / Pages 171–177

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to understand the challenges faced by the physical education teachers, nowadays, in industry 5.0. The method used was the IT literacy survbey along with Teacher Digital Competence (TDC). Meanwhile, qualitative research was done by distributing questionnaire and tests knowledge to 103 students of Internal Teacher Professional Education Position 2022. The sample selection technique used was purposive sampling, based on purpose and availability sample for inspection. Results were obtained from technical competence 77.38% mastered, while 22.62% did not master; content knowledge competence 69.91% who answered correct and 31.09 answered incorrect; pedagogical and learning design competence 39.89% implemented, 60.1% did not implement in learning. Based on the data above that required enhancement competence, skills-based technology is suggested for welcome industry 5.0.


Keywords: physical education, industry 5.0, tda method

References
[1] Ambarawati A. Urgency skills teacher nonverbal communication in the era of society 5.0. Darussalam J: J Educ, Commun Islamic Legal Thought. 2021;12(2).

[2] Aklima A, Abdul R. J Sci Educ Prof. 2022;7(2c):769–776. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v7i2c.498

[3] Ahmadi F, Ibda H. Concepts and applications literacy new in the era of revolution industry 4.0 and society 5.0 books.google.com. 2019.

[4] Arifin S. The role of physical education teachers in education establishment _ character participant educate. Multilateral J. 2017;16(1):78–92.

[5] Fallon G. From digital literacy to digital competence: framework teacher digital competence (TDC). Developer Study Educational Technology. 2020;68:2449–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4

[6] Faridah E. Teach education physical through game ” creative ideas” optimizing aspect pedagogical.” J Knowledge Sports. 2016;15(2):38–53.

[7] Ginanjar A, Suherman A, Juliantine T, Hidayat Y. Influence sport education phase using basketball against activity physique student in education physical. SPORTIF J: J Study Learn. 2020;6(2):332-347. https://doi.org/10.29407/js_unpgri. v6i2.14173.

[8] Hartanti MD, Nurhasan, Tuasikal ARS. Influence learning circuit based on approach scientific on learning outcomes dribble and shooting basketball. MULTILATERAL: J Phys Educ Sport. 2020;19(2):1–10. https://doi.org/10.20527/multilateral.v19i2.8614.g6741.

[9] Hasanah U. Learning strategy active early childhood. INSANIA J Think Alternative Educ. 2019;23(2):204-222. DOI:10.24090/ insania v 23i2.2291

[10] Koc Y. The effect of “physical education and sport culture” course on the attitudes of preservice classroom teachers towards physical education and sports. Int J High Educ. 2017;6(4):200. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n4p20 .

[11] Lesmana HS. The role of motor educability within increase skills sports in learning physical education. Archipelago Sports Page J. 2018;1(1):115–125. https://doi.org/10.31851/hon.v1i1.1507 .

[12] Mashuri H. Perception student to physical education teacher learning at Kediri Muhammadiyah High School. J Learn Sports. 2017;3(1):1–10. Retrieved from https://ojs.unpkediri.ac.id/index.php/pjk/article/view/681/505 .

[13] Nastiti FE, Abdu ARN. Study: Readiness Indonesian education is facing the era of society 5.0. Edcomtech. 2020;5(1):61-66. https://www.neliti.com/publications/334820/kajian-kesiapan- Pendidikan-indonesiamefacing- era-society-50

[14] Nasution. Educational technology. Jakarta: Earth Script. 2011.

[15] Oviyanti F. Challenge teacher education development in the global era. Nadwa. 2016;7(2):267-282.

[16] Paturusi A. Physical education and sports management. Jakarta: Rineka Create; 2017.

[17] Prasetyo RI, Hidayat N, Dimas A. Literature study of POE learning model (Predict, Observe, and Explain. Proceedings Semdikjar National Seminar on Education and Learning, vol. 3. 2019. pp. 704-710.

[18] Pujiono A. Professionalism of christian religious education teachers in the era of society 5.0. Scenoo : Journal Theology and Religious Education. 2021. https://journal.sttia.ac.id/skenoo/article/view/15

[19] Ramley P. Implementation research in development of higher order thinking skills in science education. Surakarta: FKIP UNS; 2015.

[20] Sakti, Bayu P. Indicators understanding E-Portfolio in blended learning for facing the era of society 5.0. national seminar proceedings and virtual call for papers 2020 PGSD PGRI Yogyakarta University. 2021. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348884050

[21] Stephani MR. Stimulation ability think critical through learning based on problems in physical education. J Phys Educ Sport. 2017;2(1):16–27. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpjo.v2i1.6397 .

[22] Sumarno S. Learning 21st century competencies facing the era of Society 5.0 Proceedings of SEMDIKJAR National Education and Learning Seminar; Vol. 3; 2019, pp. 272-287.

[23] Yulianto S, Roesdiyanto, Sugiharto. Analysis change curriculum in the physical education learning process sports and health in elementary school. J Educ: Theory, Res Dev. 2017;2(1):130-140. https://doi.org/10.17977/jp.v2i1.8477 .