Learner- or Teacher-centered Instruction: Student Teachers' Preference and the Role of Their English Proficiency
Abstract
Abstract. EFL student teachers should support learner-centered approach to learning because it developed autonomy and benefited them in life-long pursuit of knowledge. However, anecdotal evidence showed that some student teachers still preferred teacher-centered approach. This mixed-method study was conducted to find out: (1) whether there was a significant relationship between the preference of learner- or teacher-centered instructions and the student teachers’ English proficiency; and (2) why student teachers support teacher-centered instruction. Numeric data were collected from 51 participants by means of a structured questionnaire and test of English proficiency (TEP), whereas the qualitative data were obtained from an unstructured questionnaire and semi-structured interviews. The results showed that the preference of learner- or teacher-centered instructions were not significantly associated with their English proficiency. In addition, the student teachers preferred teacher-centered instruction for three reasons, fixed mindset, difficulties in understanding materials, and comprehensible explanations given by the teacher educators. Based on these findings, further research about this issue was recommended.
Keywords: learner-centered instruction, teacher-centered instruction, English proficiency, student teachers
References
[1] Fotos S. ”Traditional and grammar translation methods for second language teaching.” In: Hinkel E, Ed. Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2005, pp. 653-670.
[2] Wringe C. Effective teaching of modern languages. London: Routledge; 2013.
[3] Branch MR, Kopcha JT. ”Instructional design models.” In: Spector MJ, Merrill DM, Elen J, Bishop JM, Eds. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. New York: Springer; 2014.
[4] Gosling D. ”Supporting student learning.” In: Fry H, Ketteridge S, Marshall S, Eds. A handbook for teaching and learning in higher education: Enhancing academic practice. New York: Routledge; 2009. pp. 113-131.
[5] Merrill DM, Elen J. Domain-specific strategies and models. New York: Springer; 2014.
[6] Murray ED. ”Creating a technology-rich English language learning environment.” In: Cummins J, Davison C, Eds. International handbook of English language teaching. New York: Springer; 2007, pp. 747-761.
[7] Schcolnik M, Kol S, Abarbanel J. ”Constructivism in theory and in practice.” English Teaching Forum. 2006;44:12-20.
[8] Kaufman D. ”Constructivist issues in language learning and teaching.” Annu Rev Appl Linguist. 2004;24:303-319.
[9] Jones GM, Brader-Araje L. ”The impact of constructivism on education: Language, discourse, and meaning.” Am Comm J. 2002;5.
[10] Gibbons P. Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning. Portsmouth: Heinemann; 2015.
[11] Kim Y. ”Scaffolding through questions in upper elementary ELL learning.” Lit Teach Learn. 2010;15:109-137.
[12] Thomsen H. ”Scaffolding target language use.” In: Little D, Ridley J, Ushioda E, Editors. Learner autonomy in the foreign language classroom: Teacher, learner, curriculum and assessment. Dublin: Authentik; 2003.
[13] Donato R. ”Collective scaffolding in second language learning.” In: Lantolf PJ, Appel G, Editors. Vygotskian approaches to second language research. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation; 1994.
[14] Reyes AS, Vallone LT. Constructivist strategies for teaching English language learners. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press; 2008.
[15] Oxford LR. ”Hero with a thousand faces: Learner autonomy, learning strategies and learning tactics in independent language learning.” In: Hurd S, Lewis T, Editors. Language learning strategies in independent settings. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 2008.
[16] Gasciogne C. ”Independent second language reading as an interdependent process.” In: Hurd S, Lewis T, Editors. Language learning strategies in independent settings. Bristol: Multilingual Matters; 2008.
[17] Bloom M. ”Second language composition in independent settings: Supporting the writing process with cognitive strategies.” In: Hurd S, Lewis T, Editors. Language learning strategies in independent settings. Bristol: Multilingual Matters; 2008.
[18] Cohen A. ”Speaking strategies for independent learning: A focus on pragmatic performance.” In: Hurd S, Lewis T, Editors. Language learning strategies in independent settings. Bristol: Multilingual Matters; 2008.
[19] Bremner N. ”The multiple meanings of ‘student-centred’ or ‘learner-centred’ education, and the case for a more flexible approach to defining it.” Comparative Education. 2021;57:159-186.
[20] Larmer J, Mergendoller J, Boss S. Setting the standard for project-based learning. Alexandria: ASCD; 2015.
[21] Ghanizadeh A, Al-Hoorie AH, Jahedizadeh S. Higher order thinking skills in the language classroom: A concise guide. Cham: Springer; 2020.
[22] Cummins WP, Davesne C. ”Using electronic portfolios for second language assessment.” Mod Lang J. 2009;93:848-867.
[23] Delett SJ, Barnhardt S, Kevorkian AJ. ”A framework for portfolio assessment in the foreign language classroom.” Foreign Lang Ann. 2001;34:559–568.
[24] Anderson JN. ”Student involvement in assessment: Healthy self-assessment and effective peer assessment.” In: Coombe C, Davidson P, O’Sullivan B, Stoynoff S, Editors. The Cambridge guide to second language assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012.
[25] Kusumarasdyati. ”Reducing subjectivity in scoring a test by means of self-, peer and teacher assessments.” Presented at LLTC 2019, Yogyakarta; 2019.
[26] Wajnryb R. Classroom observation tasks: A resource book for language teachers and trainers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992.
[27] Hruby GG, Read S, Landon-Hays M. ”Tracing instructional tensions in the teaching of the English language arts: A primer.” In: Lapp D, Fisher D, Editors. Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts. New York: Routledge; 2011, pp. 211-217.
[28] Kusumarasdyati, Retnaningdyah P. ”TESOL practicum in Indonesia.” In: Cirocki A, Madyarov I, Baecher L, Editors. Current perspectives on the TESOL practicum. Cham: Springer; 2019.
[29] Nunan D. Learner-centered English language education: The selected works of David Nunan. New York: Routledge; 2013.
[30] Nottingham J, Larsson B. Challenging mindset: Why a growth mindset makes a difference in learning – and what to do when it doesn’t. Thousand Oaks: Corwin; 2019.
[31] Anderson JN. ”Individual differences in strategy use in second language reading and testing.” Mod Lang J. 1991;75:460-472.
[32] Chamot UA. ”Language learning strategy instruction: Current issues and research.” Ann Rev Appl Linguist. 2005;25:112-130.
[33] Wade ES, Trathen W, Schraw G. ”An analysis of spontaneous study strategies.” Read Res Q. 1990;25:147-166.
[34] Hansen JE, Stephens AJ. ”The ethics of learner-centered education: Dynamics that impede the process.” Change. 2000;32:40-47.
[35] McLean A. ”Destroying the teacher: The need for learner-centered teaching.” Engl Teach Forum. 2012;50:32-36.
[36] Weimer M. Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. San Fransisco: Jossey Bass; 2002.
[37] Doyle T. Helping students learn in learner-centered encvironment: A guide to facilitating learning in higher education. Sterling: Stylus Publishing; 2008.