Download fulltext HTML
Purnamasari, P., Frendika, R., ., L., Afza binti Amran, N., Naimi Mohamad Nor, M., & Sharofi Ismail, M. (2022). The Influence of E-Government Services on Corruption in Indonesia and Malaysia. KnE Social Sciences, 7(17), 222–234. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v0i0.12332

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v0i0.12332

statistics

  • 463 Abstract Views
  • 220 PDF Views
  • 0 HTML Views

authors

  • Pupung Purnamasari

    Pupung Purnamasari

    Faculty of Economic and Business, Universitas Islam Bandung, Indonesia
  • Rusman Frendika

    Rusman Frendika

    Faculty of Economic and Business, Universitas Islam Bandung, Indonesia
  • Lasmanah .

    Lasmanah .

    Faculty of Economic and Business, Universitas Islam Bandung, Indonesia
  • Noor Afza binti Amran

    Noor Afza binti Amran

    Tunku Puteri Intan Safinaz School of Accountancy, UUM College of Business, Malaysia
  • Mohamad Naimi Mohamad Nor

    Mohamad Naimi Mohamad Nor

    Tunku Puteri Intan Safinaz School of Accountancy, UUM College of Business, Malaysia
  • Mohamad Sharofi Ismail

    Mohamad Sharofi Ismail

    Tunku Puteri Intan Safinaz School of Accountancy, UUM College of Business, Malaysia

Published Date

  • Nov 8, 2022

The Influence of E-Government Services on Corruption in Indonesia and Malaysia

KnE Social Sciences / Science and Technology Research Symposium (SIRES) / Pages 222–234

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the relationship between the components of e-government services and corruption in Malaysia and Indonesia. Many efforts have been made by governments of both countries to provide sophisticated e-government platforms and public participations towards the anti-corruption strategy. However, cases of corruption in Indonesia and Malaysia have not shown declining trends. A total of 240 questionnaires were distributed to respondents in Indonesia and Malaysia. Mann-Whitney U was used to compare e-government services and corruption between Indonesia and Malaysia. Interestingly, results reveal that there was a difference in the e-government model between Indonesia and Malaysia settings. In Malaysia, G2G and G2C have a significant effect on corruption, but in Indonesia, G2B and G2C have significant effect with corruption.


Keywords: e-government, government to government (G2G), government to business (G2B), government to citizenship (G2C), anti-corruption.

References
[1] Nwadinobi EC, Peart A. E-government Development in Nigeria, Bank Verification No (BVN) an. Volume 8. EasyChair; 2018. https://doi.org/10.29007/h2tr.

[2] Park CH, Kim K. E-government as an anti-corruption tool: panel data analysis across countries. Int Rev Adm Sci. 2020;86(4):691–707.

[3] Wu AM, Yan Y, Vyas L. Public sector innovation, e￿government, and anticorruption in China and India: insights from civil servants. Aust J Public Adm. 2020;79(3):370–85.

[4] Abdalla S. Ip-Shing F. Framework for e-government assessment in developing countries: case study from Sudan. Electronic Government, an International Journal. 2012; 9(2):158–177.

[5] Siddique HR, Sharma A, Gupta SC, Murthy RC, Dhawan A, Saxena DK, et al. DNA damage induced by industrial solid waste leachates in Drosophila melanogaster: a mechanistic approach. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2008 Apr;49(3):206–16.

[6] Nadjib A. Corruption Analysis in Religiosity Perspective. Journal of Talent Development and Excellence. 2020;12 no. 2s:2478–89.

[7] Twizeyimana JD, Andersson A. The public value of E-Government – A literature review. Gov Inf Q. 2019;36(2):167–78.

[8] Hamzah N, Mustari MI, Basiron B. Model of Spiritual Education for Children among Successful Women in the Public Sector. Global Journal AlThaqafah. 2015;5(1):105–11.

[9] Sham FM, Yusof S. Religiosity of Muslim Adolescents from Single Parent Families Living in Government-Subsidised Settement. Global Journal Al-Thaqafah. 2015;5(2):1–12.

[10] Cressey D. Other people’s money, dalam: “Detecting and Predicting Financial Statement Fraud: The Effectiveness of The Fraud Triangle and SAS No. 99,”. Journal of Corporate Governance and Firm Performance. 1953;13:53–81.

[11] Wells JT. Corporate fraud handbook: Prevention and detection. John Wiley & Sons; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119351962.

[12] Yıldız M. Decision-Making Models Used in E-Government Projects: Evidence from Turkey. In: Morçöl G, editor. Handbook of Decision-Making. Marcel Dekker Publications; 2007. pp. 395–416.

[13] Wathne C. Understanding corruption and how to curb it A synthesis of latest thinking. Norway: CMI. CHR. Michelsen Institute: 2021.

[14] Jain AK. Corruption: A Review. J Econ Surv. 2021;15(1):71–121.

[15] Rose-Ackerman S. Political Corruption and Democracy. Conn J Int Law. 1999;14(2).

[16] Fang Z. E-Government in Digital Era: Concept, Practice, and Development. International Journal of The Computer, The Internet and Management. 2002;10(2):1- 22.

[17] Sujarweni W. Metodologi Penelitian, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Baru Press, 2014.

[18] Signore O. Towards a quality model for web sites. CMG Poland Annual Conference; 2005; Warsaw.

[19] Bhatnagar S. Transparency and Corruption: does e-government help? Draft paper prepared for the compilation of CHRI 2003 Report OPEN SESAME: looking for the Right to Information in the Commonwealth. Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative; 2003a. pp. 1–9.

[20] Kim WC, Mauborgne R. Blue Ocean Strategy. Boston: Harvard Business; 2005.

[21] Ramli RM. E-Government Implementation Challenges In Malaysia And South Korea: A Comparative Study. Electron J Inf Syst Dev Ctries. 2017;80(7):1–26.

[22] Abdullah WM, Daud S, Hanapiyah ZM. Improving Human Value through Religiosity and Spirituality in reducing Corruption Risk. 9th International Economics and Business Management Conference - European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Science; 2019; Malaysia.