Download fulltext HTML
Anggraeny, I., Monique, C., Puspitasari Wardoyo, Y., & Bhirini Slamet, A. (2022). The Urgency of Establishing Guidelines for Handling Cybercrime Cases in the Indonesian National Police Department. KnE Social Sciences, 7(15), 349–359. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i15.12107

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i15.12107

statistics

  • 337 Abstract Views
  • 203 PDF Views
  • 0 HTML Views

authors

  • Isdian Anggraeny

    Isdian Anggraeny

    Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang, Indonesia
    https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1981-0412
  • Cindy Monique

    Cindy Monique

    Master of Law, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia
    https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8735-0676
  • Yohana Puspitasari Wardoyo

    Yohana Puspitasari Wardoyo

    Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang, Indonesia
  • Aprilia Bhirini Slamet

    Aprilia Bhirini Slamet

    Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang, Indonesia

Published Date

  • Oct 4, 2022

The Urgency of Establishing Guidelines for Handling Cybercrime Cases in the Indonesian National Police Department

KnE Social Sciences / 3rd International Conference on Law Reform (3rd INCLAR) / Pages 349–359

Abstract

The Urgency of Establishing Guidelines for Handling Cybercrime Cases in the Indonesian National Police DepartmentTechnological development has a strong influence on the development of criminals. In the past, crimes were carried out in conventional ways and tools, but now crimes are carried out in modern ways. Cybercrime is a borderless crime and requires special treatment when collecting digital evidence. Evidence in cyber crime allows criminals to hide or remove their tracks. Until now, Indonesian National Police (POLRI) does not have any case management guidelines for storing digital evidence using digital forensic methods. This research aims to determine what steps investigators take in obtaining digital evidence, whether these steps have been effective in law enforcement, or whether they are still unclear. The method in this writing is normative legal research based on a statute approach and a conceptual approach. The author offers to establish guidelines for handling cyber crime cases in the Indonesian National Police by relying on digital forensic methods by strengthening and choosing the right tools for handling cases.


Keywords: cybercrime, digital evidence, digital forensic

References
[1] Ilham Y. “Sejarah Internet di Dunia dan Perkembangannya di Indonesia,” 2015. https://yusufilham.web.ugm.ac.id/2015/09/12/sejarah-internet-di-duniadan- perkembangannya-di-indonesia/ (accessed Jun. 28, 2022).

[2] Handoko, “Kedudukan Alat Bukti Digital dalam Pembuktian Cybercrime di Pengadilan,”. Jurisprudence. 2016;6(1):1–15.

[3] “Jenis Cybercrime Berdasarkan Motif dan Aktivitasnya,” Bapenda Jabar, 2017.

[4] Widodo, Sistem Pemidanaan Dalam Cyber Crime. Malang: Laksbang Mediatama; 2009.

[5] Riadi U, Umar R, Nasrulloh IM. ANALISIS FORENSIK DIGITAL PADA FROZEN SOLID STATE DRIVE DENGAN METODE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE (NIJ). Elinvo. 2018;3(1):70–82.

[6] Rahardjo B. “Sekilas Mengenai Forensik Digital,” J. Sosioteknologi, no. Agustus; 2013. pp. 384–7.

[7] J. T. Informatika, F. T. Industri, and U. I. Indonesia, “PROBLEMA DAN SOLUSI DIGITAL CHAIN OF CUSTODY Yudi Prayudi Abstract,” no. 2011, 2014.

[8] N. Maharani, A. Zakaria, F. Hukum, and U. Brawijaya, “Urgensi pengaturan tata cara pembuktian tindak pidana siber (,” no. 11, 2008.

[9] Wijanarko AA, Prakarsa A. PAMPAS : Journal Of Criminal Peran Digital Forensik dalam Pembuktian Tempus Delicti Sebagai Upaya Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Pembuat Video Pornografi pengaruhnya bagi kehidupan manusia karena perkembangan teknologi sejalan dengan Gadget memiliki pen. PAMPAS J. Crim. 2021;2(2):68–88.

[10] Djati Nugroho P, Al-Azhar N. IT : Digital Forensic. Volume 5. IPSIKOM; 2017.

[11] Prayudi L, Pratama AM. “Pendekatan Model Ontologi Untuk Merepresentasikan Body of Knowledge Digital Chain of Custody,” 2, 2014.

[12] Pengaturan R, Bukti P, Proses D, Pidana P, Indonesia DI. Rizki Zakariya 1, Yogi Prastia 2. Siti Ismaya. 2016;3:134–50.

[13] Gintin M. “Menata Regulasi Bukti Elektronik,” Tempo.com, 2019. https://kolom.tempo.co/read/1213817/menata-regulasi-bukti-elektronik

[14] Prayudi and Azhari. Digital Chain of Custody: state of the Art. Int J Comput Appl. 2015;114(5).

[15] Gobel T. “Perlunya Pusat Laboratorium Forensik Digital untuk Kelola Bukti Elektronik,” Cyberheart.id, 2020. https://cyberthreat.id/read/7482/Perlunya-Pusat- Laboratorium-Forensik-Digital-untuk-Kelola-Bukti-Elektronik

[16] Asimah D. To Overcome the Constraints of Proof in the Application of Electronic Evidence. J. Huk. Peratun. 2021;3(2):97–110.