Preventive Measures As Strategic Attempts to Cope with Criminal Acts of Corruption in Indonesia
Abstract
Corruption becomes a latent danger in almost all countries, including Indonesia. Therefore, any strategies to tackle it are always conducted. In some countries, imposing a serious punishment is the strategy chosen with the goal of giving deterrent effects to the perpetrator. In some countries, preventive measures are preferred to overcome corruption. It is intended to eliminate the root cause of corruption. This present article proposes the idea of preventive measures as a strategy to cope with corruption in Indonesia. Two main problems will be examined in this article: The first is why preventive measures become a strategy chosen to tackle criminal acts of corruption in Indonesia. The second is how theories justify the preventive measures to cope with criminal acts of corruption. Through a doctrinal approach, this study produced the following conclusions. First, preventive measures are the most strategic causative effort to cope with criminal acts of corruption in Indonesia. Second, preventive measures are justified by various theories in criminal law.
Keywords: preventive measure, strategy, coping with criminal act, corruption in Indonesia, criminal law
References
[1] Hartanti E. Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika; 2005.
[2] Chazawi A. Hukum Pidana Materiil dan Formil Korupsi di Indonesia. Malang: Bayumedia; 2005.
[3] Ashworth A. Preface. Sentencing and Criminal Justice. Cambridge University Press; 2018. pp. xiii–xiv.
[4] Kett M, Beck O, Shoham SG. International Handbook of Penology and Criminal Justice. USA: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, 2007. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books/about/International_Handbook_of_Penology_and_C.html?vUICkjo8k1EC&redir_esc=y
[5] Hall DE. Criminal Law and Procedure. 5th ed. Clifton Park (New York): Delmar, Cengage Learning; 2009.[Online], Available www.cengage.com/global
[6] Mashabi S. “Indeks Persepsi Korupsi Indonesia pada 2019 Naik Jadi 40,” Kompas. com, 2020. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2020/01/23/16565951/indekspersepsi- korupsi-indonesiapada-2019-naik-jadi-40?page=all#page3
[7] Yusriadi, Tebaran Pemikiran Kritis Hukum dan Masyarakat. Malang: Surya Pena Gemilang; 2009.
[8] Soemitro RH. Perspektif Sosial dalam Pemahaman Masalah-Masalah Hukum. Semarang: CV. Agung, 1989.
[9] Ramadhan A. “Terima Banyak Dukungan, KPK Ajak Masyarakat Terus Kawal Revisi UU KPK.” Kompas.com, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2019/09/09/16363191/terima-banyak-dukungankpk- ajak masyarakat-terus-kawal-revisi-uu-kpk
[10] Fadhil H. “ICW Kritik Keras UU KPK: Pemberantasan Korupsi Dipastikan Suram!” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://news.detik.com/berita/d-4710820/icw-kritik-kerasuu- kpk pemberantasan-korupsi-dipastikan-suram
[11] Abdi AP. “Tiga Pimpinan KPK Ajukan Judicial Review Atas UU KPK yang Baru,” Tirto.id. [Online]. Available: https://tirto.id/tiga-pimpinan-kpk-ajukan-judicial-reviewatas- uu kpk-yang-baru-el2k
[12] Yuliandra M, Ekaloga E. Soponyono, Pujiyono. “KEBIJAKAN HUKUM PIDANA DALAM PENANGGULANGAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH PEJABAT DAERAH (Policies on Criminal Law in Coping with Corruption Undergone by Local officials, Diponegoro Law Review).” Diponegoro Law J. 2012;1(4):1–11. [Online]. Available: http://ejournal-s1.undip.ac.id/index.php/dlr
[13] Waluyo B. “OPTIMALISASI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI DI INDONESIA (Optimalization of Corruption Eradication in Indoneisia).” J. Yuridis 2017;1(2): 162–169. [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.upnvj.ac.id/index.php/Yuridis/article/view/149/122
[14] Mulyadi M. PENDEKATAN INTEGRATIF DALAM PENANGGULANGAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI. J. Huk. Samudra Keadilan. 2018 Aug;13(1):1–19.
[15] KPK. “TPK Berdasarkan Jenis Perkara,” KPK (Commission of corruption Eradication), 2020. https://www.kpk.go.id/id/statistik/penindakan/tpk-berdasarkan-jenisperkara/ 109- statistik (accessed Nov. 12, 2020).
[16] KPK. “Koordinasi Supervisi,” KPK (Commission of corruption Eradication), 2019. https://www.kpk.go.id/id/statistik/koordinasi-supervisi (accessed Nov. 12, 2020).
[17] Teresia A. “Jokowi: Keberhasilan Antikorupsi Tak Diukur dari Jumlah yang Ditangkap,” Kumparan News, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://kumparan.com/kumparannews/jokowi keberhasilan-antikorupsi-tak-diukurdari- jumlah-yang-ditangkap-1543893192932112840
[18] Kompas, “Naskah lengkap pidato kenegaraan sesuai kata per kata pengucapan Presiden Joko Widodo ( Jokowi) di depan Sidang Tahunan MPR, DPR, dan DPD,” Kompas.com, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://jeo.kompas.com/naskah-lengkappidato- kenegaraan-presiden-jokowi-2020
[19] Rastika I. “Bandingkan, KPK Hongkong Punya 3000 Penyidik!” Kompas.com, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2012/09/20/10043642/ bandingkan.kpk.hongkong.punya.3000. penyidik
[20] Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1951, Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 1070 tentang Pokok-pokok Kekuasaan Kehakiman yang akhirnya diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman Robertus Bellarminus.
[21] Nugroho H. EFEKTIVITAS FUNGSI KOORDINASI DAN SUPERVISI DALAM PENYIDIKAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI OLEH KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI. J. Din. Huk. 2013;13(3):392–401.
[22] Sugiarto T. “PERANAN KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI (KPK) DALAM PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DI INDONESIA,” J. Cakrawala Huk., pp. 188–196, 2013, doi: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v18i2.1123..
[23] Jawade Hafidz YM, dan Jawade Hafidz TP, Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih. “Analisis Yuridis Kewenangan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) sebagai Penuntut Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi,”. UNIFIKASI J. Ilmu Huk. 2018 Mar;5(1):33.
[24] Halim P. “TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG DAN PENEGAKAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI,” Al-Qisth Law Rev., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 56–74, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.umj.ac.id/index.php/al-qisth/article/view/2476
[25] Effendy M. PEMBALIKAN BEBAN PEMBUKTIAN DAN IMPLEMENTASINYA DALAM PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DI INDONESIA (The Reversion of the Burden of Proof and its Implementation in the Corruption Crime in Indonesia). J. Din. Huk. 2013;17(2):201–13.
[26] Bakhri S. KEBIJAKAN LEGISLATIF TENTANG PIDANA DENDA DAN PENERAPANNYA DALAM UPAYA PENANGGULANGAN TINDAK KORUPSI. J. Huk. IUS QUIA IUSTUM. 2010;17(2):317–34.
[27] Suhariyanto B. Progresivitas Putusan Pemidanaan Terhadap Korporasi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Progressivity of Criminal Decision on Corporate Actors Corruption). J. Penelit. Huk. Jure. 2016 Jun;16(2):201.
[28] Media Indonesia. “Saatnya Utamakan Pencegahan Korupsi.” https://mediaindonesia.com/editorials/detail_editorials/1775-saatnyautamakanpencegahan korupsi (accessed Nov. 12, 2020).
[29] Morris N, Tonry M. Between Prison and Probation: Intermediate Punishments in a Rational Sentencing System. New York: Oxford University Press; 1990.
[30] Tonry M. Thinking About Crime Sense and Sensibility in American Penal Culture. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press; 2004.[Online], Available https://www.amazon.com/Thinking-about-Crime-Sensibility- American/dp/019530490X
[31] Husak D. Overcriminalization The Limits of the Criminal Law. Madison Avenue (New York): Oxford University Press, Inc; 2008.
[32] Drago F, Galbiati R, Vertova P. Prison Conditions and Recidivism. Am Law Econ Rev. 2011;13(1):103–30.
[33] Ahrens L. The Real Cost Of Prisons Comix. Oakland, USA: PM Press; 2008.
[34] Kett M, Beck O, Shoham SG. International Handbook of Penology and Criminal Justice. Boca Raton, London, New York: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group; 2008.
[35] Angkasa A. OVER CAPACITY NARAPIDANA DI LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN, FAKTOR PENYEBAB, IMPLIKASI NEGATIF, SERTA SOLUSI DALAM UPAYA OPTIMALISASI PEMBINAAN NARAPIDANA. J. Din. Huk. 2010 Oct;10(3): https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2010.10.3.46.
[36] Ashworth A. Sentencing and Criminal Justice. Cambridge University Press; 2015. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415270.
[37] Downes D, Rock P, Chinkin C, Gearty C. Crime, Social Control and Human Rights From Moral Panics to States of Denial, Essays in Honour of Stanley Cohen. Portland, Oregon, USA: Willan Publishing; 2007.
[38] Miethe TD. Punishment: A Comparative Historical Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
[39] Braithwaite J. Restorative Justice & Responsive Regulation. Madison Avenue (New York): Oxford University Press, Inc; 2002.
[40] Furio J. Restorative Justice Prison as Hell or a Chance for Redemption? Algora Publ.; 2002.
[41] Eva Achjani Zulfa. “Keadilan restoratif di Indonesia: studi tentang kemungkinan penerapan pendekatan keadilan restoratif dalam praktek penegakan hukum pidana),” Universitas Indonesia., 2009.
[42] Johnstone G, Van Ness D. Handbook of Restorative Justice. Cullompton, Devon, London: Willan Publishing; 2007.
[43] Sudarto. Hukum dan Hukum Pidana the fifth. Bandung: Alumni; 2007.
[44] Tongat, Pidana Kerja Sosial dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Djambatan; 2011.
[45] Morris R. Stories of Transformative Justice. Ontario: Canadian Scholars’ Press Inc; 2000.
[46] Rahardjo S. Hukum Progresif Sebuah Sintesa Hukum Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing; 2009.
[47] Syamsudin M. REKONSTRUKSI POLA PIKIR HAKIM DALAM MEMUTUSKAN PERKARA KORUPSI BERBASIS HUKUM PROGRESIF. J. Din. Huk. 2011 Feb;11(1): https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2011.11.1.11.
[48] S. Rahardjo, Penegakan Hukum Suatu Tinjauan Sosiologis. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.
[49] Tongat. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia dalam Perspektif Pembaharuan. Malang: UMM Press; 2008.
[50] Zernova M. Restorative Justice : Ideals and Realities. Hampshire, England: Ashgate Publishing Limited; 2007.
[51] Barda N. Arief, Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Semarang: Fajar Interpratama; 2011.
[52] Barda N. Arief, Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group; 2007.
[53] Barda N. Arief, Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group; 2008.
[54] Ashworth A, Wasik M. Fundamentals of Sentencing Theory: Essays in Honour of Andrew von Hirsch (Oxford Monographs on Criminal Law and Justice). Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1998.