Download fulltext HTML
Marbun, R., & Wijaya, F. (2022). The Game of Truth in Criminal Law Enforcement Process on Corruption Crimes. KnE Social Sciences, 7(15), 192–201. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i15.12090

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i15.12090

statistics

  • 118 Abstract Views
  • 107 PDF Views
  • 0 HTML Views

authors

Published Date

  • Oct 4, 2022

The Game of Truth in Criminal Law Enforcement Process on Corruption Crimes

KnE Social Sciences / 3rd International Conference on Law Reform (3rd INCLAR) / Pages 192–201

Abstract

The enforcement of criminal law against corruption, nowadays, increasingly shows the existence of a form of truth play through the construction of knowledge that is normalized through authority as a manifestation of the cognitive interpretation of law enforcement. The formation of the game of truth hides behind social framing, thus ignoring the provisions of existing legal norms. The power and authority possessed as capital to determine legal action are not based on the law itself. This study aims to describe a form of truth game that overrides legal provisions. This research is a legal research using the relational trichotomy approach and critical discourse analysis approach. The results of this study indicate the formation of a truth game to maintain social anger against the perpetrators of corruption, thus ignoring the legal rights of the perpetrators of corruption.


Keywords: truth game, corruption, legal effort, relationship trichotomy

References
[1] Wahyono P. Indonesia Negara Berdasarkan Atas Hukum. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia; 1986.

[2] Soekanto S. Faktor-faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penegakkan Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada; 2014.

[3] Marbun R. Praktik Hukum Pidana Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana: Membangun Landasan Kefilsafatan dan Teoretis (Buku I). Yogyakarta: CV. Arti Bumi Intaran, 2019.

[4] J. Pontier, Rechtsvinding (Penemuan Hukum). Jakarta: Jendela Mas Pustaka; 2008.

[5] Endicott T (Marmor A, editor). Legal interpretation,” in The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Law. New York: The Taylor & Francis Group; 2012.

[6] Collier CW. Law as Interpretation Chi-Kent. Law Rev. 2000;76:779–823.

[7] Greenberg M. “Principles of Legal Interpretation,” Univ. Calif., 2016, [Online]. Available:https://philosophy.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Principles-of- Legal-Interpretation-2016.pdf

[8] Anggraeni R. Pengusungan pola pikir positivisme hukum dalam perkara korupsi. J. Yudisial. 2011;6(3):262–78.

[9] Yuntho E. Eksaminasi terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi pada Pengadilan Negeri Kelas I A Khusus Bandung Atas Nama Terdakwa Rachmat Yasin. INTEGRITAS. 2018 Apr;2(1):235.

[10] Marbun R. Narasi Tunggal (Grand Narrative) Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Suatu Keterlemparan dalam Simulacra. Soumatera Law Rev. 2020;3(1):93–106.

[11] Putro WD. Kritik Terhadap Paradigma Positivisme Hukum. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing; 2011.

[12] Launa L. “KONSTRUKSI PEMBERITAAN KORUPSI PEGAWAI NEGERI SIPIL,” Diakom J. Media dan Komun. 2019 Sep; 2(1):98–111. https://doi.org/10.17933/diakom.v2i1.36..

[13] Marbun R. Konferensi Pers Dan Operasi Tangkap Tangan Sebagai Dominasi Simbolik : Membongkar Kesesatan Berpikir Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana Press Conference And Hand Catch Operations As Symbolic Domination : Dismantling Fallacy In Criminal Law Enforcement. Ius Const. 2022;7(1):1–18.

[14] Setiadi W. “Korupsi di Indonesia (Penyebab, Bahaya, Hambatan dan Upaya Pemberantasan, serta Regulasi),” J. Legis. Indones. 2018;15(3):249–62.

[15] Alam S, Aunuh N, Luthfi M. “E-Court Effectiveness of Religious Courts in Indonesia,” Atl. Press, vol. 590, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=id&user=jHB7DKQAAAAJ&citation_

[16] Soekanto S. Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Binacipta; 1983.

[17] Mudhoffir AM. Teori Kekuasaan Michel Foucault: Tantangan bagi Sosiologi Politik. Masy. J. Sosiol. 2013 Jan;18(1): https://doi.org/10.7454/mjs.v18i1.3734.

[18] Syafiuddin A. “Pengaruh Kekuasaan Atas Pengetahuan (Memahami Teori Relasi Kuasa Michel Foucault),” Refleks. J. Filsafat dan Pemikir. Islam. 2018 Jul;18(2):141.

[19] Adlin A. “Michel Foucault: Kuasa/Pengetahuan, (Rezim) Kebenaran, Parrhesia,” JAQFI urnal Aqidah dan Filsafat Islam,” vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 13–26, 2016.

[20] ERIK S, HUTAHAEAN H. “Psikologi Kepolisian : Seragam, Pangkat dan Senjata Api,” Pros. PESAT. 2015;6:29–36.

[21] Azwar S. Sikap Manusia. Teori dan Pengukurannya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar; 1995.

[22] Natsir N. Hubungan Psikolinguistik dalam Pemerolehan dan Pembelajaran Bahasa. J. Retorika. 2017;10(1):20–9.

[23] Marbun R. “Trichotomy of Relation Through Instrumental Communication in Pre- Adjudication Stage: The Failure of Criminal Procedure Code to Foster Law Enforcement Attitudes,” in the 1st International Conference on Education, Humanities, Health and Agriculture,” pp. 1–10, 2021. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.3-6- 2021.2310893.

[24] Fauzan U. Analisis Wacana Kritis Dari Model Fairclough Hingga Mills. J. Pendidik. 2014;6(1).

[25] Wibowo W. Konsep Tindak Tutur Komunikasi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara; 2016.

[26] Fransisco B. Hardiman, Demokrasi Deliberatif. Menimbang Negara Hukum dan Ruang Publik dalam Teori Diskursus Jürgen Habermas. Yogyakarta: Kanisius; 2013.

[27] Mu’minatus F. Firdaus, “Analisa Kritis Terhadap ‘Penyalahgunaan Wewenang,”. J. Ekon. Bisnis. 2015;20(3):156–62.

[28] Gündoğan E. Conceptions of Hegemony in Antonio Gramsci’s Southern Question and the Prison Notebooks. New Propos. J. Marx. Interdiscip. Inq. 2008;2(1):45–60.

[29] Zurmailis Z, Faruk F. “DOKSA, KEKERASAN SIMBOLIK DAN HABITUS YANG DITUMPANGI DALAM KONSTRUKSI KEBUDAYAAN DI DEWAN KESENIAN JAKARTA,” Adab. J. Bhs. dan Sastra. 2018 Jan; 1(1): 44. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajbs.2017.01103.