Development of an English Classroom Instruction Module to Support Students' Bilingual Learning
Abstract
There are no teaching materials available to help students learn bilingually in elementary school teacher training (PGSD) in Indonesia. The goal of this study was to create an English classroom instruction module to help students improve their ability to learn in a bilingual environment. This module provided students with opportunities to practice teaching using English as a bilingual classroom instruction language, allowing them to develop creativity in their teaching techniques and incorporate English into their students’ daily interactions. This study also examined the module’s suitability for teaching bilingual learning. The investigation was carried out using the research and development method, following the Borg and Gall stages, which included 1) research and data collection, 2) planning, 3) initial product development, 4) initial field testing, 5) major product revisions, 6) main field testing, and 7) operational product revision. Observations, questionnaires and tests were used to gather information. Descriptive statistics and the paired sample t-test were used to analyze the data. According to the findings (media expert validation average score of 4.14, indicating good criteria, and material expert validation average score of 4, indicating good criteria) the English classroom instruction module is feasible to use in bilingual learning. The module also works to improve students’ abilities, as evidenced by an average pre-test score of 77.32 increasing to 87.04 in the post-test, which was found through the paired sample t-test to be a significant increase in scores. It was concluded that the English classroom instruction module can improve students’ abilities in bilingual learning.
Keywords: bilingual learning, module, English classroom instruction, students
References
[1] Atli I. The effect of pronunciation instruction on students’ overall speaking skills. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012;46:3665–3671.
[2] Garvey B, Krug M. Model-model pembelajaran sejarah di sekolah menengah. Yogyakarta: Ombak; 2015.
[3] Fransyaigu R. Penerapan inkuiri moral berbasis nilai-nilai kearifan lokal minangkabau “alam takambang jadi guru” untuk pembentukan karakter siswa. Jurnal Diss. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.Vol 2014(1);1-14; 2014.
[4] Pernantah PS, Sariyatun S, Warto W. Integration sumpah satie bukik marapalam values in historical learning through problem-based learning. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding. 2018;5(3):28-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v5i3.138
[5] Wicaksono GW, Asrini HW, Al-Rizki MA. Desain perangkat pembelajaran pendidikan tinggi dengan sistem lective gegulang. Jurnal Nasional Teknik Elektro Dan Teknologi Informasi ( JNTETI). 2017;6(4):416-22.
[6] Daryanto D. Menyusun modul bahan ajar untuk persiapan guru dalam mengajar. Yogyakarta: Gava Media; 2013.
[7] Joyce B, Weil M, Calhoun E. Models of teaching, model-model pengajaran, terj. achmad fawaid dan ateilla mirza. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar; 2011.
[8] Kemendiknas. Sosialisasi KTSP: Pengembangan bahan ajar. Jakarta: Kemdiknas RI; 2018.
[9] Brown HD. Principles of language learning and teaching. New York: Longman; 2000.
[10] Scott WA, Ytreberg LH. Teaching English. New York: Longman; 2003.
[11] Gottardo A, Grant A. Encyclopedia of language and literacy development. London: Canadian Language and Literacy Research Network; 2011.
[12] H.D. Moghgan saiiad Mollashshi, Mohammad Reza Ghaznavi, Khaled Kord, “THE CONCEPT OF BILINGUALISM.,” Radix International Journal of Research in Social Science. vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 1–10, 2013
[13] M. Margana and S. Sukarno, “Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Bilingual di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan.,” Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran. vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 79–93, 2011.
[14] Depdiknas. Teknik belajar dengan modul. Jakarta: Dirjen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah; 2002
[15] Wijaya C, Djadjuri D, Rusyan AT. Upaya pembaharuan dalam pendidikan dan pengajaran. Bandung : Remaja Karya. 1988.
[16] Syamsul A, Adi K. Sukses menulis buku ajar dan rerefensi. Jakarta: PT Grasindo; 2009.
[17] Andi P. Panduan kreatif membuat bahan ajar inovatif. Yogyakarta:Diva Press: 2011
[18] Borg WR, Gall MD. Exploring relationships between variables: The causalcomparative method. Educational research: An introduction. 5th ed. New York: Longman; 1989.
[19] Finch CR, Crunkilton JR. Curriculum development in vocational and technical education. Planning, content, and implementation. Needham Heights: Allyn and Bacon; 1999.
[20] Lasmiyati L, Harta I. Pengembangan modul pembelajaran untuk meningkatkan pemahaman konsep dan minat SMP. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. 2014;9(2):161-74