Developing a Self-Assessment Instrument for a Microteaching Class
Abstract
The goal of this research was to create a self-assessment instrument for evaluating professional teachers’ performance in the microteaching course at FKIP UPY. This development research was based on Thiagarajan’s 4D development model, which included the stages of define, design, development, and dissemination. The participants were FKIP students who were taking microteaching classes. Purposive sampling was used and data were collected through student questionnaires. Data were triangulated using the DPL response questionnaire. With the help of the SPSS 16.0 program, empirical validity and reliability were calculated. A self-assessment instrument for assessing the performance of professional teachers for microteaching learning courses for FKIP UPY students was prepared, containing 42 items, which was developed through determining the material, determining instrument constructs, compiling grids, and compiling questionnaires. The instrument content was found to have good results for validation, and a reliability index of 0.75; the percentage of responses from microteaching supervisors was 88.5%. These results indicated that the self-assessment instrument can be recommended for assessing the performance of professional teachers in microteaching learning courses at FKIP UPY.
Keywords: self-assessment, performance character, microteaching
References
[1] Undang-undang republik Indonesia nomor 20 tahun 2003 tentang sistem pendidikan nasional. Depdiknas; Jakarta, Indonesia. 2003.
[2] Peraturan pemerintah republik Indonesia nomor 19 tahun 2005 tentang standar nasional pendidikan. Kemendikbud; Jakarta, Indonesia. 2005.
[3] Reddy KR. Teaching how to teach: Microteaching (a way to build up teaching skills). Journal of Gandaki Medical College-Nepal. 2019;12(1):65-71. https://doi.org/10.3126/jgmcn.v12i1.22621
[4] Usman M. Menjadi guru profesional. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya; 2005.
[5] M.R.D. Wahyulestari, “KETRAMPILAN DASAR MENGAJAR DI SEKOLAH DASAR.,” In: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan. pp. 199–210. Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, Jakarta (2018).
[6] S Sukirman. Pengembangan sistem evaluasi. Yogyakarta: Insan Madani; 2012.
[7] Labib MM. Pengaruh hasil pembelajaran micro teaching terhadap kompetensi mahasiswa praktik pengalaman lapangan (PPL) dalam implementasi kurikulum 2013 SMK se-kota Semarang. Semarang: Universitas Negeri Semarang; 2016.
[8] Pala A. The need for character education. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies. 2011;3(2):23-32.
[9] Singh B. Character education in the 21st century. Journal of Social Studies ( JSS). 2019;15(1):1-2.
[10] T. Lickona, E. Schaps, and C. Lewis, Eleven Principles of Effective Character Education. , Washington, 2017.
[11] Aisyah AR, “THE IMPLEMENTATION OF CHARACTER EDUCATION THROUGH CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING AT PERSONALITY DEVELOPMENT UNIT IN THE SRIWIJAYA UNIVERSITY PALEMBANG.,” International Journal of Education and Research. vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 203–214, 2014
[12] Wuryani MT, Yamtinah S. Textbooks thematic based character education on thematic learning primary school: An influence. International Journal of Educational Methodology. 2018;4(2):75-81.
[13] Taras M. Student self-assessment: What have we learned and what are the challenges. Relieve. 2015;21(1):199-209.
[14] S. Thiagarajan, D.S. Semmel, and M.I. Semmel, Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Exceptional Children: A Sourcebook., 1974
[15] Sugiyono., Metode penelitian pendidikan : (pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R & D). Alfabeta, 2008.