The Impact of Abnormal Audit Fees on Audit Quality: A Study of ASEAN Countries
Abstract
This study investigates the impact of abnormal audit fees on audit quality. An abnormal audit fee is the difference between the actual fee paid by the auditee to the external auditor and the normal fee. If the actual audit fee is above the normal audit fee, it is called a positive abnormal audit fee (premium) and if the actual audit fee is below the normal audit fee, it is called a negative abnormal audit fee (discount). The samples for this study were 3,694 selected companies from Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, the Philippines, and Thailand. Data were analyzed using regression analysis and it was found that positive abnormal audit fees could decrease the audit quality. This is because of the economic arrangement between the auditors and the clients as the auditor will be more tolerant towards the earnings management carried out by the client. On the other hand, negative abnormal audit fees have an insignificant relationship with the audit quality, which means if auditors are paid below the normal fees, they have no incentive to compromise the audit quality. Because audit fees can affect audit quality, regulators need to make policies so that audit fees paid to the external auditors should not be more than the normal fees.
Keywords: audit quality, audit fees, negative abnormal audit fees, positive abnormal audit fees, abnormal working capital accruals
References
[1] Kinney WR, Libby R. The relation between auditors’ fees for nonaudit services and earnings management: Discussion. The Accounting Review. 2002;77:107-114
[2] Hribar P, Kraver T, Wilson R. A new measure of accounting quality. Working paper. University of Iowa; IOWA; 2010.
[3] CHOI, Jong-Hag; KIM, Jeong-Bon; and ZANG, Yoonseok. Do Abnormally High Audit Fees Impair Audit Quality?. (2010). Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory. 29, (2), 115-140. Research Collection School Of Accountancy.
[4] Nugroho B, Fitriany F. Impact of abnormal audit fees on audit opinion and quality in ASEAN countries. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities. 2019;27(2); 1959-1977.
[5] Fitriany F, Veronica S, Anggraita V. Impact of abnormal audit fee to audit quality: Indonesian case study. American Journal of Economics. 2016;6(1);72-78.
[6] Francis JR, Wang D. The joint effect of investor protection and big 4 audits on earnings quality around the world. Contemporary Accounting Research. 2008;25(1):157–191.
[7] DeFond ML, Park CW. The reversal of abnormal accruals and the market valuation of earnings surprises. The Accounting Review. 2001;76(3):375-404.
[8] Corbella S, Florio C, Gotti G, Mastrolia SA. Audit firm rotation, audit fees and audit quality: The experience of Italian public companies. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation. 2015;25:46-66.
[9] Eshleman JD, Guo P. Abnormal audit fees and audit quality: The importance of considering managerial incentives in tests of earnings management. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. 2014;33(1):117-138.
[10] Higgs JL, Skantz TR. Audit and nonaudit fees and the market’s reaction to earnings announcements. Audit Journal of Practicing Theory. 2006;25(1):1–26.
[11] Mitra S, Deis DR, Hossain M. The association between audit fees and reported earnings quality in pre- and post-Sarbanes-Oxley regimes. Review of Accounting and Finance. 2009;8(3):232–252.
[12] Hoitash R, Markelevich A, Barragato CA. Auditor fees and audit quality. Managerial Audit Journal. 2007;22(8):761–786.
[13] Patrick K, Pronobis P, Zülch H. Abnormal audit fees and audit quality: Initial evidence from the German audit market. Journal of Business Economics. 2015;85(1):45-84.
[14] Blankley AI, Hurtt DN, MacGregor JE. Abnormal audit fees and restatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. 2012;31(1):79-96.
[15] Kinney, W. and Libby, R. Discussion of: The Relation between Auditors’ Fees for Non-Audit Services and Earnings Management. The Accounting Review, 2002, 77, 107-114..
[16] DeAngelo LE. Auditor independence, low balling, and disclosure regulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 1981;3:113-127.
[17] DeFond M, Raghunandan K, Subramanyam K. Do non-audit services fees impair auditor independence? Evidence from going concern audit opinions. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 2002;40(4):1247–1274.
[18] Dye RA. Informationally motivated auditor replacement. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 1991;14(4):347–374.