Download fulltext HTML
Purnomo, J., & Susanti, . (2022). Vertical Collaborative Governance in Corporate University Implementation at a Regional Tax Office. KnE Social Sciences, 7(9), 1392–1409. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i9.11023

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i9.11023

statistics

  • 292 Abstract Views
  • 191 PDF Views
  • 0 HTML Views

authors

  • Junaedi Purnomo

    Junaedi Purnomo

    Department of Administrative Sciences, Faculty of Law, Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Terbuka Indonesia
  • . Susanti

    . Susanti

    Department of Administrative Sciences, Faculty of Law, Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Terbuka Indonesia

Published Date

  • May 20, 2022

Vertical Collaborative Governance in Corporate University Implementation at a Regional Tax Office

KnE Social Sciences / The 3rd International Conference on Governance, Public Administration, and Social Science (ICoGPASS) / Pages 1392–1409

Abstract

A corporate university is an organization that brings together the learning in an organization and capacity development. The Financial Education and Training Agency (BPPK) in the Financial Education and Training Center (BDK) in Yogyakarta is applying lessons within the relevant regional offices of the Directorate General of Tax (Kanwil DJP) of Jawa Tengah II, specifically with account representative officers in the tax office (KPP). The learning process of a corporate university can be achieved with vertical synchronization and collaborative governance between regional offices. The purposes of a corporate university can be achieved through the optimal and sustainable efforts of the Ministry of Finance. Limitations include: the size of the region’s work, the large number of participants (around 400 persons), the annual period of implementation, and changes in the policy and internal organization of the DJP.


Keywords: collaborative governance, corporate university, learning, implementation, limitations

References
[1] Yuniarto AV. Faktor-faktor kunci kesuksesan implementasi corporate university dalam rangka transformasi badan pendidikan dan pelatihan keuangan. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen dan Bisnis. 2019; 5(3):466-477.

[2] Agustini F. Strategi manajemen sumber daya manusia. Medan: UISU Press; 2019.

[3] Hamel ASP. A new approach to agency in a collaborative decision making process. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology; September 19-22, 2005.

[4] BPPK. Keputusan kepala BPPK nomor KEP-140/PP/217 tentang cetak biru Kementerian Keuangan corporate university. Jakarta: Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia; 2017.

[5] BPPK. Laporan kinerja BPPK 2016. Jakarta: Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia; 2016.

[6] Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). Jateng.bps.go. 2020 July 28. Available from: https://jateng.bps.go.id/statictable/2020/07/28/2064/realisasi-penerimaan-pajakjawa-tengah-menurut-jenis-pajak-juta-rupiah-2014—2019.html

[7] Bianchi CGN. Implementing collaborative governance: Models, experiences, and challenges. Public Management Review. 2021; 23(11):1-10.

[8] Ansell CAG. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2007; 6(4):543-571.

[9] Chrislip DD. The collaborative leadership fieldbook. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2002.

[10] Doberstein C. Designing collaborative governance decision making in search of a collaborative advantage. Public Management Review. 2016; 18(6):819-841.

[11] Gandasari DSG. Proses kolaboratif antar pemangku kepentingan pada konsorsium anggrek berbasis komunikasi. Mimbar. 2005; 31(1):81-91.

[12] Gerber ER. Spatial dynamics of vertical and horizontal intergovernmental collaboration. Journal of Urban Affairs. 2014; 37(3):1-19.

[13] Ewer G, Russ-Eft D. Corporate university theory and practice: The case of Platt University, USA. International Journal of HRD Practice, Policy and Research. 2017;2(1):35-49.

[14] Firdaus A. The implementation of corporate university in public sector: Case study Ministry of Finance of Indonesia. The Hague: International Institute of Social Studies; 2017. p. 1-40.

[15] Dandolini, G. A., Freire, P. de S., & de Souza, J. A. Implementation process of corporate university in network (CUN). International Journal for Innovation Education and Research. 2017;5(12):101-126.

[16] Hadiyati E. Service quality and performance of public sector: Study on immigration office in Indonesia. International Journal of Marketing Studies. 2014; 6(6):104-117.

[17] Hanafi CS. Kolaborasi pemerintahan. Jakarta: UT; 2020.

[18] Haudi. Pengantar ilmu pemerintah. Solok: Insan Cendekia Mandiri; 2021.

[19] Ilyas M. Making of a corporate university model: Transition from traditional training to learning management system. Journal of Education and Practice. 2017;8(15):85-90.

[20] Jennifer E, Mosley JW. Decision making in collaborative governance networks: Pathways to input and throughput legitimacy. Chicago: Public Management Research Association; 2020.

[21] Kingdon JW. Agenda alternatives and public policies. United States of America: Pearson; 2014.

[22] Hsieh J. Y., Kuotsai Tom Liou. Collaborative leadership and organizational performance assessing the structural relation in a public service agency. Review of Public Personnel Administration. 2016; 38(1):1-27.

[23] Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia. Biro SDM. 2021 Sep 18. Available from: https://www.sdm.kemenkeu.go.id

[24] Kurniati D. Komunikasi efektif dalam praktik kolaborasi sebagai upaya meningkatkan kualitas pelayanan. Ejournal Unisayogya. 2017; 1(1):1-6.

[25] Lytovchenko I. Corporate university as a form of employee training and development in American companies. Advanced Education. 2016;5:35-41.

[26] Maddock S. Transformational public leadership is collaborative governments and public services have to change. Human Resource Management International Digest. 2011; 19(7):40-41.

[27] Tadaki JS-B. Does collaborative governance increase public confidence in water management survey evidence from Aotearoa New Zealand. Water Alternatives. 2020; 13(2):302-323.

[28] Mason A. Building better collaboration: Improving collaborative behaviours in local government. East Hertfordshire: University of Birmingham; 2015.

[29] Maulana RY. Collaborative governance in the implementation of e-government based public services inclusion in Jambi Province, Indonesia. Journal of Governance. 2020; 5(1):91-104.

[30] Michel CL. Collaborative governance beyond mere participation. Paper presented at: Third International Public Policy Conference, Center for Research and Teaching in Economics Mexico City; June 28-30, 2017; Singapore.

[31] Ranatiwi M. Dampak jejaring kolaborasi dan kapabilitas inovasi terhadap kinerja. Ekobis. 2018; 19(1):49 - 58.

[32] Zabri MAH. The level of service quality in the Malaysian public service sector. World Applied Sciences Journal. 2016; 34(5):594-600.

[33] OC, Lyikal. Investigating a quality of services in the public sector. Journal of Economic and Social Development. 2016; 3(2):1-15.

[34] Virtanen, Petri. Developing public sector leadership. Switzerland: Springer; 2020.

[35] Munhurrun PR. Service quality in the public service. International Journal of Management and Marketing Research. 2010; 3(1):37-50.

[36] O’Leary R. Collaborative public management. The American Review of Public Administration. 2012; 42(5):507-522.

[37] Steiss AW. Strategic management for public and nonprofit organizations. USA: Marcel Dekker, Inc.; 2003.

[38] Taufiqurokhman. Manajemen strategik. Jakarta Pusat: Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik; 2016.

[39] Tizard J. The challenges and opportunities in contemporary public sector leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Public Services. 2015; 8(4):182-190.

[40] Viltard LA. Are corporate universities (CU) possible in emerging countries? Arcor University (AU). Independent Journal of Management & Production. 2014;5(3):581- 597.

[41] Wanna JO. Collaborative governance: A new era of public policy in Australia. Australia: Australia National University E Press; 2008.