A Reward System Model for High-Performing State Civil Apparatus in Indonesia
Abstract
The provision of rewards for the performance of State Civil Apparatus (ASN) personnel within the Indonesian Government is not currently regulated by an efficient system. Budget reallocation for priority handling of the COVID-19 pandemic has been important. This study aimed to map and develop a performance and reward system model for the Ministry of Finance, the Indonesian National Police (POLRI), the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), state-owned enterprises (Telkom, PLN, and Pertamina), the West Java Provincial Government, and the Yogyakarta City Government. Qualitative descriptive methods were used to create a reward system model for high-performing ASN employees that took into account the components of their performance. It was concluded that the reward system could be financial or non-financial in nature and should be given in accordance with employee performance achievement. The findings can be used to provide an overview of a fair reward system for civil servants in Indonesia who have excelled at their jobs.
Keywords: reward, high performance, financial, non-financial
References
[1] The Global Economy.com. Indonesia: Government effectiveness
[2] E-Government U. E-Government Development Index.
[3] Klaus Schwab W. The Global Competitiveness Report Geneva;
[4] World Bank Group. Doing Business 2019 Training for Reform. Washington, DC;
[5] Bank TW. Worldwide Governance Indicators.
[6] Transparency International(the Global Coalition Against Corruption). CORRUPTION. PERCEPTIONS INDEX
[7] UNDP. Human Development Index. Human Development Reports.
[8] Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara Dan Reformasi Birokrasi. Peraturan Presiden Nomor 81 Tahun 2010 tentang Grand Design Reformasi Birokrasi 2010- 2025 [Internet]. Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia 2010 p. 1– Available from: http://www.bpkp.go.id/uu/filedownload/5/4/bpkp
[9] Pendayagunaan K. Results of Bureaucratic Reform Evaluation. Jakarta;
[10] Komisi Aparatur Sipil Negara. Results of The Merit System Evaluation. Jakarta;
[11] Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 30 Tahun 2019 Tentang Penilaian Kinerja Pegawai Negeri Sipil. Kementerian Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia Indonesia; 2019 p. 1–
[12] Manzoor F, Wei L, Asif M. Intrinsic Rewards and Employee’s Performance With the Mediating Mechanism of Employee’s Motivation. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021;12(563070).
[13] Onyekwelu RU. Organization Reward System and Employee Service Delivery?: A Study of Anambra State Civil Service. NG-Journal of Social Development. 2018;7(1):118–
[14] Ejikeme OF, Ifedioranma UJ, Nebeife, Onyemaechi D, Donatus NC. Reward Management and Employee Performance in Selected Manufacturing Firms In Enugu State. International Journal of management and enterpreneurship. 2020;2(1):139–
[15] Aguinis H. Performance Management. 3rd ed. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc;
[16] Armstrong M, Baron A. Managing Performance: Performance Management in Action [Internet]. London: CIPD House; 182 p. Available from: https://books.google.com/books?id=qWR_SZPmQh8C&pgis=1
[17] Sastrohadiwiryo B. Indonesian Manpower Management. Earth Literature;
[18] OLD online [Internet]. Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2018 p
[19] Sihotang A. Human Resource Management. Jakarta: PT Pradnya Paramita;
[20] Simamora H. Human Resource Management. 3rd ed. Yogyakarta: STIE YKPN. Publishing;
[21] Peraturan Pemerintah R. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 46 Tahun 2011 tentang Penilaian Prestasi Kerja PNS.
[22] Mangkunegara AP PA. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya;
[23] Patel A. The Six Traits High-Performing Employees Share [Internet]. Available from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/theyec/2019/05/21/the-six-traits-high-performingemployees-share/?sh=6bce50da16fb