Implementation of Investment Facility Services in the Ministry of Investment
Abstract
This study aimed to examine the implementation of policies concerning the investment facility services of the Online Single Submission system (OSS) version 1.1 which was launched in January 2020. According to the results of a previous survey of facilities in 2020, there had been a decrease in the level of satisfaction concerning the effectiveness and efficiency of facility services, and also a decrease in the processing targets for the import facility services. The researchers of this study used a qualitative approach and collected data through interviews and document analysis. Edward’s theory was employed, which focuses on four aspects: communication, disposition, resources, and bureaucracy. This was combined with three perspectives of performance indicators from the Ministry of Investment/BKPM: customers, internal processes, and learning. The results indicated that the investment facility services of the OSS version 1.1 have not been effective due to several factors, including: (1) lack of communication and coordination, and policy inconsistencies; (2) unclear service information, and a lack of technical guidance and socialization; (3) a lack of support for resources through the budget, human resources and infrastructure; and (4) a lack of periodic structured evaluation. The recommendations are thus as follows: first, the government needs to make informative and detailed guidelines for facility services and conduct socialization with stakeholders before a policy is implemented. Second, there is a need for periodic internal evaluations every month; the results of the evaluation should be recorded; follow-up improvements should be made; and the obstacles found should be submitted to the Management Review Meeting. Third, the facility unit should detail its training needs and training should be carried out regularly to improve the capabilities of its employees. Fourth, the government needs to create a fully integrated facility service system, and when building this, it is necessary to apply the principles of clarity, convenience, acceleration, transparency, legality, and measurability.
Keywords: communication, information, coordination, consistency, evaluation, socialization
References
[1] William ND. Pengantar analisis kebijakan publik. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press; 2003.
[2] Sugiyono S. Metode penelitian kauntitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta; 2011.
[3] David L. Understanding artificial intelligence ethics and safety: A guide for the responsible design and implementation of AI systems in the public sector. The Alan Turing Institute; British. 2019.
[4] Mthethwa RM. Critical dimensions for policy implementation. South Africa: School ofPublic Management and Administration University of Pretoria; 2012.
[5] Edward GC. Implementing public policy. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press; 1980.
[6] Martin SW, Tim K. Innovation in the public sector. Australian Journal of Public Administration. 2015.
[7] Simon C, Alistair BJ. Impact of e-procurement: Experiences from implementation in the UK public sector. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management. 2007.Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages 294-303.
[8] Vaidya K, ASM Sajeev, G Callender. Critical factors that influence e-procurement implementation success in the public sector. Journal of Public Procurement. 2006. Vol. 6 No. 1/2, Pages. 70-99.
[9] Edoardo O, Giovanni V. Public management reform in Italy: Explaining the implementation gap. International Journal of Public Sector Management. 2008. Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages. 174-204.
[10] El-Haddadeh R, V Weerakkody, S. Al-Shafi. The complexities of electronic services implementation and institutionalization in the public sector. Information & Management. 2013. Volume 50, Issue 4, Pages 135-143.
[11] Lawson-Body A, Lori Willoughby, Laurence Mukankusi et al. The critical success factors for public sector CRM implementation. Journal of Computer Information Systems. 2015. Volume 52, Issue 2, Pages 42-50.
[12] Luis P, Major M. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence: Key success factors for quality management implementation: Evidence from the public sector. 2015. Volume 27, Issue 9-10, Pages 517–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2015.1055239
[13] Ines M, Desouza KC. Implementing open innovation in the public sector: The case of challenge. Wiley Online Library. America: 2013. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12141
[14] Gregory A Aarons, Michael Hurlburt, Sarah McCue Horwitz. Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors. USA: Adm Policy Ment Health.; 2010.
[15] Abdulwahid S, Muhammad Kawar Usman, Sehar Zufiqar et al. Why do public sector organizations fail in implementation of strategic plan in Pakistan? Islamabad: Public Policy and Administration Research; 2013.
[16] Christoffel JH. Integrated financial management information systems: Guidelines for effective implementation by the public sector of South Africa. South Africa: University of the Free State, South Africa; 2012.
[17] Citra S, Arie Pratama, Prof Sri Mulyani. Good governance implementation in public sector: Exploratory analysis of government financial statements disclosures across ASEAN countries. Indonesia: Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Padjadjaran. 2015.
[18] Hadari NH. Manajemen sumber daya manusia untuk bisnis yang kompetitif. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press; 2000.
[19] Sulistiyani A, Teguh, Rosidah R. Manajemen sumber daya manusia: Konsep, teori dan pengembangan dalam konteks organisasi public. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu; 2003.
[20] Septiana M. 2020. Implementasi kebijakan online single submission (OSS) dalam rangka mempermudah izin lokasi di wilayah kabupaten Bekasi [Thesis], Jakarta. Politeknik STIA LAN Jakarta. 2020.
[21] Hardianti WM, Setyowati MS. Implementasi kebijakan tax allowance dalam upay peningkatan iklim investasi pada sektor kelautan dan perikanan [Thesis]. 2019. Universitas Padjajaran. Bandung. 2019.
[22] Kurniawan D. Implementasi kebijakan pemberian insentif serta kemudahan penanaman modal di wilayah provinsi jawa barat dihubungkan dengan peraturan wilayah provinsi jawa barat no 21 tahun 2011 tentang penanaman modal [Thesis]. Universitas Pasundan. Bandung. 2016.
[23] Undang-Undang nomor 11 tahun 2020 tentang cipta kerja.
[24] Undang-Undang nomor 25 tahun 2007 tentang penanaman modal.
[25] Peraturan pemerintah nomor 24 tahun 2018 tentang pelayanan perizinan berusaha terintegrasi secara elektronik.
[26] Peraturan pemerintah nomor 5 tahun 2021 tentang penyelenggaraan perizinan berusaha berbasis risiko.
[27] Peraturan Menteri Keuangan nomor 176 tahun 2009 jo. nomor 188 tahun 2015 tentang pembebasan bea masuk atas impor mesin serta barang dan bahan.
[28] Peraturan Badan Koordinasi Penanaman Modal nomor 6 tahun 2018 tentang pedoman dan tata cara perizinan dan fasilitas penanaman modal.
[29] Horby AS. Oxford advanced learners dictionary of current English. Oxford University Press; England. 1974.