Accountability of Money Management Implementation Through the Banking Application System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i9.10955Abstract
Rukun Tetangga and Rukun Warga are the embodiments of community empowerment in the roles and functions of government administration, development, and community services. In DKI Jakarta Province, a new mechanism for reporting accountability of the implementation of the duties and functions of Rukun Tetangga and Rukun Warga has been applied. However, the community is not well informed about the accountability of the use of money for the implementation of these tasks and functions. The goal of this research was to examine the relationship between the responsibility reporting mechanism and accountability. This study used descriptive qualitative methods. Interviews were conducted with informants who were directly related to the research topic. In addition, community members were given document studies and questionnaires to collect secondary data. Based on the findings, it can be concluded that this program has not run optimally, even with as many as 123 RTs opening RT institutional accounts. A limitation of the program is that not all RTs in Kelurahan Menteng Dalam have taken part. Socialization of application implementation should be implemented.
Keywords: accountability, mechanism, application
References
Asropi A. Penjelasan teoritik hubungan pengukuran kinerja dan akuntabilitas. Journal of Public Policy and Applied Administration. 2020;2(1).
Behn RD. Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures. Public Administration Review. 2003;63(5).
Bovens M. New forms of accountability and EU-governance. Comparative European Politics. 2007;5(1):104–120. https://doi.org/10.1057/PALGRAVE.CEP.6110101
Bovens M. The Oxford handbook of public management. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199226443.003.0009
Burke JP. Bureaucratic responsibility. 1986.
Dubnick M. Clarifying accountability: An ethical theory framework. Public Sector Ethics: Finding and Implementing Values. 1998. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203063941-11
Dubnick MJ. Accountability and ethics: Reconsidering the relationships. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior. 2003;6(3):405–441.
Elster J. Accountability in Athenian politics. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. 1999:253–278. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175104.009
Flynn JR. What is intelligence? Beyond the Flynn effect. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605253
Gruber JE. Controlling bureaucracies: Dilemmas in democratic governance. 1987.
Haque MS. Limits of public accountability under the reinvented state in developing nations. 2007.
Miles M, Huberman A. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. 1994. Available from: https://books.google.com/books?hl=id&lr=&id=U4lU_-wJ5QEC&oi= fnd&pg=PA10&dq=miles+and+huberman+qualitative+data+analysis&ots= kFUGZFPQUP&sig=sYba2p3r7A1R05Q5AdXFkPcYLLs
Mulgan R. Policy and governance ublic sector reform in New Zealand: Issues of public accountability public sector reform in New Zealand-issues of public accountability. 2004.
Ndraha T. Kybernology (Ilmu pemerintahan baru). 2011.
Nyamori RO. Making development accountable: A critical analysis of the systems of accounting and accountability for the Constituency Development Fund in Kenya. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1108/18325910910963436
Pollitt C. Performance management in practice: A comparative study of executive agencies. Office of Public Services Reform; 2002. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui045
Pratiwi S. Analisis sistem pembayaran dana operasional RT dan RW Kelurahan Cipedak. Openjournal.Unpam.Ac.Id. 2020;1(1):14–19.
Purnamasari D. Sekecil apa pun, dana operasional RT/RW harus akuntabel. Tirto.id; 2018. Available from: https://tirto.id/sekecil-apa-pun-dana-operasional-rt-rw-harusakuntabel-cCXs
Roberts J. Accountability in Athenian government. University of Wisconsin Press; 1982.
Rosen B. Holding government bureaucracies accountable. 1989.
Schedler A, Diamond L, Plattner MF. The self-restraining state: Power and accountability in new democracies. 1999. Available from: https://books.google.co.id/ books?hl=id&lr=&id=MD8Vx1HLOZgC&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=Schedler,+1999&ots= -mL5pnxLO6&sig=kTAgwQ8jDKNI9FqXlceo6iS4ICY&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q= Schedler{%}2C1999&f=false
Scott MB, Lyman SM. Accounts. American Sociological Review. 1968;33(1):46–62. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092239
Soesetyo A. Kebijakan sistem pemerintahan e-government di kabupaten Tulungagung. Ojs.Umsida.Ac.Id; 2013. Available from: http://ojs.umsida.ac.id/index.php/jkmp/article/view/423
