The Learners’ Characteristics towards Achieving Learning Performance in Blended Learning


Blended learning is a combination of traditional face-to-face classroom situation and online situation. In this paper, the study focuses on the characters of UNISEL students towards achieving learning performances in blended learning. A questionnaire is directed to 103 respondents to answer. There are 3 sections in the questionnaire related to blended learning. Each section is followed by 5 questions. Hence, it shows that different students’ have different opinions towards blended learning despite their age, gender, course and faculty. This finding shows that some students prefer to use blended learning. However, there are some who think that blended learning is not suitable for them. Learners’ characteristics and interaction towards learning performance is the major outcome of this research. In conclusion, learners characteristics towards achieving the learning performance in blended learning is crucial in order to find a solution and the remaining problem that has not been figured out is a focus point for the future researchers. 

Keywords: blended learning, learners’ characteristics, learning performance 

[1] Qiang, H. Learners’ Perceptions of Blended Learning and the Roles and Interaction of f2f and Online Learning. ORTESOL Journal, 2016;33:14-33.

[2] Sriwichai, C. Students’ Readiness and Problems in Learning English through Blended Learning Environment. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 2020;6(1):23-34. doi:10.20448/journal.522.2020.61.23.34

[3] Stefan, H. What Do We Mean by Blended Learning? TechTrends.2019. Available from:

[4] Zhang, W., & Zhu, C. Blended Learning as a Good Practice in ESL Courses Compared to F2F Learning and Online Learning. International Journal of Mobileand Blended Learning, 2020;12(1):63-81.Available from:

[5] Adams, D., Sumintono, B., Ahmed Mohamed., and Nur SM. E-Learning Readiness Among Students of Diverse Backgrounds in a Leading Malaysian Higher Education Institution. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 2018 ;15(2):227-256.

[6] Adams, D., Mabel, HJ., Sumintono, B., and Oh, SP. Blended learning engagement in higher education institutions: A differential item functioning analysis of students’ backgrounds. Malaysian Journal of Learning & Instruction, 2020;17(1):133-158.

[7] Wentao, C., Jinyu, Z., & Zhonggen, Y. Learning Outcomes and Affective Factors of Blended Learning of English for Library Science. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 2016;12(3):13-25. doi: 10.4018/IJICTE.2016070102

[8] Serrano, D. R., Dea- Ayuela, M. A., Gonzalez-Burgos, E., Serrano-Gill, A., & Lalatsa, A. Technology- enhanced learning in higher education: How to enhance student engagement through blended learning. European Journal of Education, 2019;54(2):273-286. doi: 10.1111/ejed.12330

[9] Wai, C. C., & Seng, E. L., Measuring the effectiveness of blended learning environment: A case study in Malaysia. Education and Information Technologies, 2013;20(3):429-443. doi: 10.1007/s10639-013-9293-5

[10] Altay, IA. and Altay, A. A Review of Studies on Blended Learning in EFL Environment. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 2019;11(1):125-140.

[11] Chunlin, Y. A case study of Chinese adult learners’ English acquisition in a blended learning environment. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 2019;59(1):116-135.

[12] Kintu, M.J., Zhu, C., & Kagambe, E. Blended Learning effectiveness: the relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 2017;14(7):1-20. doi: 10.1186/s41239- 017-0043-4

[13] Wichadee, S. Significant predictors for effectiveness of blended learning in a language course. THE JALT CALL Journal, 2018;14(1):25-42.

[14] Nortvig, A. M., Petersen, A.K., & Balle, S. H. . A Literature Review of the Factors Influencing E- Learning and Blended Learning in Relation to Learning Outcome, Student Satisfaction and Engagement. The Electronic Journal of e- Learning, 2018;16(1):46-55.