Download fulltext HTML
Raudy Gathmyr, M., & Bre Aulia Surenggo, M. (2022). Investigating the Role of Symbolic Elites in Shaping Public Discourse: A Case of Detikcom. KnE Social Sciences, 7(4), 216–234. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i4.10525

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i4.10525

statistics

  • 483 Abstract Views
  • 164 PDF Views
  • 0 HTML Views

authors

  • Mohammad Raudy Gathmyr

    Mohammad Raudy Gathmyr

    President University, Department of Communication, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Bre Aulia Surenggo

    Muhammad Bre Aulia Surenggo

    President University, Department of Communication, Indonesia

Published Date

  • Mar 10, 2022

Investigating the Role of Symbolic Elites in Shaping Public Discourse: A Case of Detikcom

KnE Social Sciences / International Conference on Humanities and Social Sciences / Pages 216–234

Abstract

Public discourse in the mass media following the political contestation of the 2017 DKI Jakarta Governor election made the Islamic Defenders Front (Front Pembela Islam) become more popular in Indonesia. FPI had a central role in the victory of the candidates it supported: Anies Baswedan and Salahuddin Uno. Considered by some as one of the most influential Islamic mass organizations in post-Reformation Indonesia, especially since 2016 after organizing a demonstration event known as the 212 Demo Action, with various pros and cons surrounding it, FPI is a social movement phenomenon that is highly and widely debated in various circles. As a ’media-darling’ (in its negative sense), it is interesting to highlight in this context how the mass media construct news stories for FPI and its leaders. Employing the critical discourse approach of ideological square and symbolic elites from Teeun A van Dijk, this paper examines how one of the largest mainstream media organizations in Indonesia, Detikcom, ’mediates’ discourse about FPI through its reporting.


Keywords: symbolic elites, CDA, FPI, Indonesia

References
[1] Anhari I. Soal FPI bantu korban banjir, mabes polri: Yang kita larang organisasinya, bukan kegiatannya. Republik Rakyat Merdeka (RMOL); 2021 Feb 22.
[2] van Dijk TA. Racism and the press. New York, NY: Routledge; 1991.
[3] Waikar P. Reading Islamophobia in hegemonic neoliberalism through a discourse analysis of Donald Trump’s narratives. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs. 2018;38:153-178.
[4] Jones R, Norris S, editors. Discourse in action: Introducing mediated discourse analysis. New York, NY: Routledge; 2015.
[5] Ahlstrand JL. Strategies of ideological polarisation in the online news media: A social actor analysis of Megawati Soekarnoputri. Discourse & Society. 2021;32(1):64–80.
[6] Meijer I, C. Kormelink TG. Checking, sharing, clicking and linking. Digital Journalism. 2015;3(5):664-679.
[7] Fairclough N. Language and power. London and New York: Longman; 1989.
[8] van Dijk TA. Discourse and manipulation. Discourse & Society. 2006;17(3):359–383.
[9] Baker P. Using corpora in discourse analysis. London: Continuum; 2006.
[10] ”detik.com Overview”. SimilarWeb. SimilarWeb LTD. Retrieved 24 February 2020.
[11] ”detik.com Overview”. SimilarWeb. SimilarWeb LTD. Retrieved 24 February 2020.
[12] Ivanova A, Jocelin-Almendras JA. Representations of (im)migrants in Chilean local press headlines: A case study of El Austral Temuco. International Migration & Integration, 23, 227–242 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-021-00832-2.
[13] Detikcom T. Kosgoro dukung pemerintah larang FPI: “Mereka terlihat ditung- gangi asing”, 15 February 2022, https://news.detik.com/berita/d-5315683/kosgoro- dukung-pemerintah-larang-fpi-mereka-terlihat-ditunggangi-asing.
[14] Detikcom T. Amien rais kritik Jokowi soal FPI dilarang, bawa-bawa cerita firaun, 5 February 2022. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-5317006/amien-rais-kritik-jokowi- soal-fpi-dilarang-bawa-bawa-cerita-firaun, Retrieved 15 February 2022.