Download fulltext HTML
Pulkin, M. V. (2022). Parish Budget: The Economic Basis for the Activities of Confessional Communities in the 18th and Early 20th Centuries. KnE Social Sciences, 7(3), 108–111. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i3.10431

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i3.10431

statistics

  • 135 Abstract Views
  • 91 PDF Views
  • 0 HTML Views

authors

  • Maxim V. Pulkin

    Maxim V. Pulkin

    Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Published Date

  • Feb 11, 2022

Parish Budget: The Economic Basis for the Activities of Confessional Communities in the 18th and Early 20th Centuries

KnE Social Sciences / Integration Processes in the Russian and International Research Domain: Experience and Prospects / Pages 108–111

Abstract

This article discusses the main patterns in the formation of church property and the provision of the parish clergy with the means of subsistence. It is revealed that the natural and consistent evolution of property relations between the clergy and the laity over more than two centuries did not lead to significant changes. The emergence of parish trusteeships, called upon to place the spending of church funds under the joint control of the clergy and the laity, essentially led to the consolidation of the previously established norms of relations between the priest and parishioners in property matters.


Keywords: clergy, finance, budget, property, peasants, Christianity, Orthodoxy, income

References
[1] Bernshtam TA. Parish life of the Russian village: Essays on church ethnography. St. Petersburg: Peterburgskoe Vostokovedenie; 2005.
[2] Fedorov VA. The Russian Orthodox Church and the State. Synodal period. 1700-1917. Moscow: Russkaia Panorama; 2003.
[3] Kuznetsov SV. Orthodox parish in Russia in the 19th century. Pravoslavnaia vera i traditsii blagochestiia u russkikh v XVIII–XX vv. Moscow: Nauka; 2002.
[4] Obizhennyi. Broken dreams and disappointed hopes. Olonetskie Eparkhial’nye Vedomosti. 1911;32:555–557.
[5] Pavlov AS. A course in church law, honored Professor of the Imperial Moscow University A.S. Pavlova. St. Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo Lan’; 2002.
[6] Pobedonostsev KP. The most submissive report of the Chief Prosecutor of the Holy Synod K. Pobedonostsev for the Department of the Orthodox Confession for 1894 and 1895. St. Petersburg: «Synodal Printing House»; 1898.