Health Screening of the Elderly Using Geriatric Mobile Apps (SIM Lansia) in Malang Primary Health Care
Abstract
In the city of Malang, there are currently 109,368 geriatrics. However, Malang Primary Health Care (PHC) coverage of geriatrics screening remains low at the end of 2021 (26%). In accordance with the Malang District Health Office’s approval, Google Forms were used for the geriatrics’ data gathering. The purpose of this study was to analyse the difference in geriatric data coverage before and after using SIM Lansia Apps’. This study used a quantitative study design. The population in this study were all Malang city cadres with 57 cadres participating. There were two parts to the data gathering process: the first was to collect the geriatrics’ data after two months of app use, and the second was to conduct a Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Test with 12 closed-ended questions to ask respondents about their opinions of using the SIM Lansia Apps’. The data was analyzed using the statistic Z test to compare the pre-app use and post-app use coverage data, and the TAM response was categorized using a Likert scale. After utilizing the app, the coverage of geriatric screening data increased by roughly 43.79% (May-July) using SIM Lansia, and the Z test indicated that this increase was statistically significant (P value = 0.000). Five dimensions of the TAM Test revealed that all respondents agree on Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, Attitude Toward Using Technology, Behavioral Intention to Use, and Actual Use of Technology in using SIM Lansia Apps’. The apps showed effectiveness and efficiency in increasing geriatrics’ data gathering coverage in every PHC in Malang City.
Keywords: Geriatric, Cadre, SIM Lansia Apps, Primary Health Care (PHC)
References
[1] Kementerian Kesehatan RI. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Tahun 75 Tahun 2014. 2014;634. Available from: https://hsgm.saglik.gov.tr/depo/birimler/saglikli-beslenme-hareketli-hayatdb/ Yayinlar/kitaplar/diger-kitaplar/TBSA-Beslenme-Yayini.pdf
[2] Kemenkes RI. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 2016 Tentang Standar Minimal Bidang Kesehatan. 2016.
[3] Kane JM. Technology-based interventions in health care. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2014 Dec;23(4):323–6.
[4] Sun Y, Wang N, Guo X, Peng Z. Understanding the acceptance of mobile health services: A comparison and integration of alternative models. J Electron Commerce Res. 2013;14(2):183–200.
[5] Agustina UN, Fanida EH. Efektivitas Penerapan Sistem Informasi Manajemen Puskesmas Elektronik (Simpustronik) Di Puskesmas Gantrung Kecamatan Kebonsari Kabupaten Madiun. JurnalmahasiswaUnesaAcId [Internet]. 2015;12:1–10. Available from: http://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/publika/article/view/14660
[6] Zhao P, Yoo I, Lavoie J, Lavoie BJ, Simoes E. Web-based medical appointment systems: A systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr;19(4):e134.
[7] Reza M, Habibi M, Mohammadabadi F, Tabesh H, Vakili-arki H. Effect of an Online Appointment Scheduling System on Evaluation Metrics of Outpatient Scheduling System : a before-after Multicenter Study. 2019;1–9.
[8] Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Manage Inf Syst Q. 1989;13(3):319–39.
[9] Cao W, Wan Y, Tu H, Shang F, Liu D, Tan Z, et al. A web-based appointment system to reduce waiting for outpatients: A retrospective study. BMC Health Serv Res [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2021 Aug 6]; Available from: https://www.academia.edu/37615999/A_webbased_ appointment_system_to_reduce_waiting_for_outpatients_A_retrospective_study https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-318.
[10] Ftoon H. Kedwan, Justinia T. Patients Online Registration System: feasibility and Perceptions. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2017;7(3):90–5.
[11] Yu W, Yu X, Hu H, Duan G, Liu Z, Wang Y. Use of hospital appointment registration systems in China: a survey study. Glob J Health Sci. 2013 Jul;5(5):193–201.
[12] Nuswantoro UD. Persepsi Pasien dI Puskesmas Kota Semarang Terhadap Pendaftaran Online Sebagai Implikasi Smart City. 2020;18(2):1–8. Available from: http://publikasi.dinus.ac.id/index.php/visikes/article/view/3679
[13] Santi IH, Erdani B. Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Penggunaannya pada Analisis User Experience dalam Penerimaan Sistem Informasi Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Bojong Pekalongan. PT. Nasya Expanding Management; 2021.
[14] Sinaga E. Haryanto. Evaluasi Penerapan Sistem Informasi Puskesmas di Kabupaten Sleman. J Inf Syst Public Heal. 2016;1(2):44–51.
[15] Tiara LI, Subinarto S. Analisis Penyebab Tidak Digunakannya Sistem Informasi Manajemen Puskesmas (Simpus) dalam Penerimaan Pasien Rawat Jalan di Puskesmas Kalimas Kecamatan Randudongkal Kabupaten Pemalang. J Rekam Medis dan Inf Kesehat. 2019;2(2):65.
[16] Eprilianto DF, Sari YEK, Saputra B. Mewujudkan Integrasi Data Melalui Implementasi Inovasi Pelayanan Kesehatan Berbasis Teknologi Digital. JPSI ( Journal Public Sect Innov. 2019;4(1): https://doi.org/10.26740/jpsi.v4n1.p30-37.
[17] Udayanti ED, Nugroho FA. Analisa Minat Penggunaan Aplikasi TB eScoring dengan Pendekatan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Edu Komputika J. 2018;5(1):1–12.
[18] Putra DM, Vadriasmi D. Analisis Penerapan Sistem Informasi Manajemen Rumah Sakit (SIMRS) di TPPRJ Menggunakan Metode UTAUT di RSD TK. III Dr. Reksodiwiryo Padang. Adm Heal Inf J. 2020;1(1):55–67.
[19] Jober NF, Harjoko A. Evaluasi SIMRS Menggunakan Metode Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) pada bagian rawat inap RSUD Abepura Jayapura Provinsi Papua. J Inf Syst Public Heal. 2018;3(2):1–8.