Relative Variability in Signs of Reproductive Fitness of Pigs
Studies of relative variability make it possible to forecast the future. The equations of rectilinear and multiple regression make it possible to determine a productive indicator by indirectly evaluating correlatively related features. We developed mathematical modelson the relative variability in the signs of reproductive fitness of pigs in the breeding factories of the North Caucasus: “Ventsy-Zarya”, “Gulkevichsky”, “Kavkaz” and “Zarya” of the Krasnodar Territory, “Rossiya” of the Stavropol Territory, and “Rossiya” of the Rostov region. We analyzed the correlations of reproductive fitness in these breeding farms to determine a reliable and objective assessment of cause-andeffectdependencies, and the values, nature and direction of their action. Significant differences were established between the nature of relations in various breeding farms; however, their action vectorscoincided. The models we developed take into account all of the processes occurring in the population under the influence of tribal selectionand can be used in the planning of breeding measures.
Keywords: pig breeding, relative variability, correlation, regression, breeding index
 Anker, A. (1982).Importance and Problems of Pig Selection. Actual Issues of Applied Genetics in Animal Husbandry. Moscow: Kolos, рр. 216-252.
 Tretyakova, O.L. (2017).Differentiated Selection and Hybridization of PigsNorwegian Journal of Development of the International Science, vol. 1, issue 5, pp. 15-21.
 Maximov, A.,et al. (2019). Determining Genotypes of 3-Breed Pig Hybrids by Marker Genes and their Interrelation with Meat Productivity. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, vol. 25, issue 4,pp. 782- 794.
 Svinarev, I.Y., et al. (2017). Relationship between the Polymorphism of the PRLR and MC4R Genes with the Breeding Index of Pig Reproductive Qualities. Pig Breeding, vol. 8, pp. 11-15.
 Fedorenko, V.F., et al. (2018). Best Practices in Domestic Livestock Breeding. In Scientific Analytical Review. Moscow: FGBNU “Rosinformagrotech”, рр. 61-70.
 Svinarev, I.Y., Kulikova, N.M. and Shevchenko, A.V. (2015). Efficiency of Index Breedingof LandraceVariety. Pig Breeding, vol. 8,pp. 25-28.
 Svinarev, I.Y. and Shevchenko, A.V. (2014). Malformations of Sow Nipples, Reliability of Diagnosis. Pig Breeding, vol. 8, pp. 43-45.
 Gorlov, I.F., et al. (2019). Evaluation of Combining Ability of Lines in Hybridization of Pigs.Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences, vol. 10 pp. 1164-1171.
 Svinaryov, I.Y., et al. (2015).Modeling a Regional Pig Breeding System. Scientific Journal of Kuban State Agricultural University, vol. 114, рр. 1001-1017.
 Belyaev, D.K. and Ratner, V.A. (1962). Analysis of Genetic and Phenotypic Correlations in Connection with Some Problems of Selection and Evolution. Doc. USSR Academy of Sciences,vol.142, issue 3,pp. 699-702.
 Lawlor L.R. (1976) Molting, Growth and Reproductive Strategies in the Terrestrial Isopod Armadillidium Vulgare. Ecology, issue 57. pp. 1179-1194.
 King, J.L. (1967).ContinuouslyDistributed Factors Affecting Fitness. Genetics, vol. 55, pp. 483 - 492.
 Keshman, E. A. (2008). On the 100th Anniversary of Vladimir Pavlovich Efroimson. Genetics, vol. 44, issue 10, pp. 1301-1308.
 Norton, I.O. and Sclater, J. G. (1979). A Model for the Evolution of the Indian Ocean and the Break-up of Gondwanaland. Journal of Geophysics Research, vol. 84,pp. 6803-6830.
 Terentyev, P.V. (1959). Methods of Correlation Pleiades. Bulletin of Leningrad State University, Biology, vol. 9, issue 2, pp. 137-141.