The effectiveness of blended learning in basic life support training among nursing students: A systematic review
Abstract
Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) is a global health problem and poses challenges in various fields, including education. Some training programs such as Basic Life Support (BLS) training need to adapt to new policies, which are physical and social distancing. Blended learning by combining face-to-face with online training, may help achieve BLS competencies for health care professionals, including nursing students. This systematic review was conducted to explore blended learning effectiveness in BLS training for nursing student populations. The electronic search strategy was conducted from PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane for the years 2010 to 2020 with full text in English. This review followed the PRISMA guidelines. The initial search yielded 240 studies, and six of those studies were eventually included. The results reported there were three blended learning models appeared, including face to face learning combined with e-learning website, combined with video-based, and combined with computer-based simulations. With an intervention duration of four hours to two weeks, there was an indication of several improving outcomes, including skills, knowledge, attitudes, self-efficacy, problem-solving abilities, and willingness to perform resuscitation. Furthermore, the skill outcome is significantly more effective in blended learning of face-to-face models combined with the e-learning website and combined with computer-based simulations. The knowledge outcome parameter likely is the most effective from all of three blended learning models. These findings imply that BLS training needs to use blended learning models by modifying the training modules, facilities, and infrastructure as consideration.
Keywords: Basic life support, blended learning, nursing students, systematic review
References
[1] WHO. (2020, March). Retrieved May 19, 2020 from http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/ health-emergencies/coronavirus-covid-19/news/news/2020/3/who-announces-covid-19-outbreak-apandemic.
[2] Berdowski, J., et al. (2010). Global Incidences of Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and Survival Rates: Systematic Review of 67 Prospective Studies. Resuscitation, vol. 81, issue 11, pp. 1479-87.
[3] Truong, H.T., Low, L. S. and Kern, K. B. (2015). Current Approaches to Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Current Problems in Cardiology, vol. 40, issue 7, pp. 275-313.
[4] Hasselqvist-Ax, I., et al. (2015). Early Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 372, issue 24, pp. 2307-15.
[5] Wang, J., Ma, L. and Lu, Y. Q. (2015). Strategy Analysis of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training in the Community. Journal of Thoracic Disease, vol. 7, issue 7, pp. E160-5.
[6] Aqel, A. A. and Ahmad, M. M. (2014). High-Fidelity Simulation Effects on CPR Knowledge, Skills, Acquisition, and Retention in Nursing Students. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, vol. 11, issue 6, pp. 394-400.
[7] Partiprajak, S. and Thongpo, P. (2016). Retention of Basic Life Support Knowledge, Self-Efficacy and Chest Compression Performance in Thai Undergraduate Nursing Students. Nurse Education in Practice, vol. 16, issue 1, pp. 235-41.
[8] Tobase, L., et al. (2017). The Effects of an Online Basic Life Support Course on Undergraduate Nursing Students’ Learning. International Journal of Medical Education, issue 8, pp. 309-313.
[9] Bowden, T., et al. (2012). Web-Based Video and Feedback in the Teaching of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Nurse Education Today, vol. 32, issue 4, pp. 443-7.
[10] Swan, J. G. (2017). The Challenges of Online Learning Supporting and Engaging the Isolated Learner. Journal of Learning Design, vol. 10, issue 1, pp. 20-30
[11] Greif, R., et al. (2015). European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 10. Education and Implementation of Resuscitation. Resuscitation, issue 95, pp. 288-301.
[12] Coyne, E., et al. (2018). Investigation of Blended Learning Video Resources to Teach Health Students Clinical Skills: An Integrative Review. Nurse Education Today, issue 63, pp. 101-107.
[13] Lehmann, R., et al. (2015). Improving Pediatric Basic Life Support Performance through Blended Learning with Web-Based Virtual Patients: Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 17, issue 7, p. e162.
[14] Bennett, J. A. (2005). The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT): Guidelines for Reporting Randomized Trials. Nursing Research, vol. 54, issue 2, pp. 128-32.
[15] Moher, D., et al. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med, vol. 6, issue 7, p. e1000097.
[16] Castillo, J., et al. (2018). Basic Life Support and External Defibrillation Competences after Instruction and at 6Months Comparing Face-To-Face and Blended Training. Randomised Trial. Nurse Education Today, issue 65, pp. 232-238.
[17] Castillo, J., et al. (2019). Cost Minimization Analysis for Basic Life Support. Resuscitation, issue 134, p. 127-132.
[18] Moon, H. and Hyun, H. S. (2019). Nursing Students’ Knowledge, Attitude, Self-Efficacy in Blended Learning of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. BMC Medical Education, vol. 19, issue 1, p. 414.
[19] Park, J. Y., Woo, C. H. and Yoo, J. Y. (2016). Effects of Blended Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Defibrillation E-learning on Nursing Students’ Self-efficacy, Problem Solving, and Psychomotor Skills. Computers Informatics Nursing, vol. 34, issue 6, pp. 272-80.
[20] Young-Sook, R. and Sang Suk, K. (2014). The Effect of Computer-Based Resuscitation Simulation on Nursing Students’ Performance, Self-Efficacy, Post-Code Stress, and Satisfaction. Research & Theory for Nursing Practice, vol. 28, issue 2, pp. 127-139.
[21] Birkun, A. A., et al. (2019). Blended Distance-classroom Training as an Alternative to the Traditional Classroom Training in Basic Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Automated External Defibrillation. Russian Sklifosovsky Journal “Emergency Medical Care”, vol. 8, issue 2, pp. 145-151.
[22] McGarry, B. J., et al. (2015). Flexible Learning Design in Curriculum Delivery Promotes Student Engagement and Develops Metacognitive Learners: An Integrated Review. Nurse Education Today, vol. 35, issue 9, pp. 966-73.