New Approach on Organizing the Monitoring of Macrophytobenthos in the Russian Arctic
The minimum number of samples was estimated based on the studies of the distribution of macrophytobenthos. The existing norms of three replicates per sampling station do not always allow to obtain reliable average values. The collection of a large number of samples, especially seasonally, will lead to significant changes in the studied community. It is recommended to put into practice the use of the method of photographing the areas of particular size along transects for further analysis using special software. It is proposed also to amend the existing regulatory documents on sampling of macrophytobenthos in the Barents Sea and other seas of the Russian Arctic. In particular, it is worth making the most of landscape surveys and mapping. The development of a monitoring system for species diversity and macrophytobenthos distribution in the seas of the Russian Arctic is justified in regard to the monitoring of the community state, including that considering the climate change.
 Borja, A., Bald, J., Franco, J., et al. (2009). Using multiple ecosystem components, in assessing ecological status in Spanish (Basque Country) Atlantic marine waters. Marine pollution bulletin, vol. 59(1–3), pp. 54–64.
 Wiencke C., Clayton M. N., Gómez I. et al. (2007). Life strategy, ecophysiology and ecology of seaweeds in polar waters. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, vol. 6(1–3), pp. 95–126.
 Wiencke C., & Amsler C. D. (2012). Seaweeds and their communities in Polar Regions. In Seaweed Biology pp. 265–291. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
 Dunton K. H., Reimnitz E., Schonberg S. (1982) An Arctic kelp community in the Alaskan Beaufort Sea. Arctic, vol. 35, pp. 465–484.
 Malavenda, S. V., Shoshina, E. V., Kapkov, V. I. (2017) Species diversity of macroalgae in various areas of the Barents Sea. Bulletin of the Murmansk State Technical University, vol. 20(2), pp. 336–351.
 Lilley S. A. & Schiel D. R. (2006). Community effects following the deletion of a habitat-forming alga from rocky marine shores. Oecologia, vol. 148(4), pp. 672–681.
 Martin G. & Torn K. (2004). Classification and description of phytobenthic communities in the waters of the West-Estonian Archipelago Sea. Hydrobiologia, vol. 514(1–3), pp. 151–162.
 Bennett, K., Wilson, S. K., Shedrawi, G., et al. (2016). Can diver operated stereo-video surveys for fish be used to collect meaningful data on benthic coral reef communities? Limnology and Oceanography: Methods, vol. 14(12), pp. 874–885.
 Barashkov G. K. (1965) About the method of quantitative accounting of littoral algae In Distribution and composition of commercial algae of the Barents Sea. Moscow-Leningrad: Nauka. [In Russian]
 Ed. Tsyban, A. V. (1980). Guide to the methods of biological analysis of the sea water and bottom sediment. Leningrad, Gidrometeoizdat. [In Russian]
 SNiP 11-02-96 (1996). Guidelines for the collection and processing of materials during hydrobiological studies in water bodies.
 Olenin, S., Elliott, M., Bysveen, I. et al. (2011). Recommendations on methods for the detection and control of biological pollution in marine coastal waters. Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 62 (12), pp. 2598–2604.
 Lakin, G. F. (1990). Biometrics. Moscow: Higher. School. [In Russian]
 Malavenda S. V., Shavykin A. A., Vashchenko P. S. (2015) Macrophytobenthos biomass and areas of its greatest vulnerability to oil spills in the Kola Bay Environmental protection in the oil and gas complex, vol. 12, pp. 5–12. [In Russian]
 Evseeva, N. V. (2018). Species composition of seaweeds of the coastal zone of the Murmansk coast and the Novaya Zemlya archipelago. Proceedings of VNIRO, vol. 171, pp. 7–25. [In Russian]
 Vinogradova, K. L. (1999). The distribution of macrophyte algae in the Arctic seas of Russia. Novosti Sistematiki Nizshikh Rastenii, vol. 33, pp. 14–24.
 Makarov M. V., Ryzhik I. V., Voskoboinikov G. M. (2007). Restoration of thickets of Fucus algae in the littoral of the Barents Sea. Proceedings of VNIRO. vol. 147, pp. 376–380. [In Russian]
 Keser M., Swenarton J. T., Foertch J. F. (2005). Effects of thermal input and climate change on growth of Ascophyllum nodosum (Fucales, Phaeophycea) in eastern Long Island Sound (USA). Journal of Sea Research, vol. 54, pp. 211–220.
 Pedersen A., Kramer G., Yarish C. (2008). Seaweed of the littoral zone at Cove Island in Long Island Sound annual variation and impact of environmental factors. Applied Phycology, vol. 20(5), pp. 419–432.
 Torn, K., Herkül, K., Martin, G., & Oganjan, K. (2017). Assessment of quality of three marine benthic habitat types in northern Baltic Sea. Ecological indicators, vol. 73, pp. 772–783.
 Preskitt L. B., Vroom P. S., Smith C. M. (2004). A rapid ecological assessment (REA) quantitative survey method for benthic algae using photoquadrats with scuba. Pacific Science, vol. 58(2), pp. 201–209.
 Lam, K., Shin, P. K., Bradbeer, R. et al. (2006). A comparison of video and point intercept transect methods for monitoring subtropical coral communities. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, vol. 333(1), pp. 115–128.
 Ballesteros, E., Torras, X., Pinedo, S. et al. (2007). A new methodology based on littoral community cartography dominated by macroalgae for the implementation of the European Water Framework Directive. Marine pollution bulletin, vol. 55(1–6), pp. 172–180.
 Węsławski, J. M., Kendall, M. A., Włodarska-Kowalczuk, M. et al. (2011). Climate change effects on Arctic fjord and coastal macrobenthic diversity—observations and predictions. Marine Biodiversity, vol. 41(1), pp. 71–85.
 Sant N., Chappuis E., Rodríguez-Prieto C. et al. (2017). Cost-benefit of three different methods for studying Mediterranean rocky benthic assemblages. Scientia Marina, vol. 81(1), pp. 129–138.
 Malavenda S. S., Malavenda S. V. (2012). Features of degradation in phytocenoses of the southern and central arms of the Kola Bay of the Barents Sea. Bulletin of the Murmansk State Technical University, vol. 15(4), pp. 794–802.