The Accuracy of the Weight of the Fetal Agency Using Ultrasound Based on the Formula Hadlock Compared to the Birth of New Body Weight

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the result of the calculation of fetal weight estimation based on Hadlock’s formula with baby birth weight. The design of this research is quantitative analytic. The data is analyzed by the t-test. The results of this study showed that the analysis of the average comparison between TBJ (Fetal Weight Estimation) and BBL (Fetal Birth Weight) is 2623,60 with 2946,67. There is a significant difference with the value of sig.(2-tailed) 0,000 <0,05, which means there is a significant difference between the estimated fetal weight based on Hadlock’s formula with baby birth weight. Based on the result of the study of fetal weight interpretation using Hadlock’s formula, an accuracy of 89,34% was seen.

References
[1] Makes daniel, Setiawan M, Sidharta H. Perkembangan Ultrasonologi 3. Medan: Universitas Tarumanagara UPT Penerbitan; 1991. 1 p.

[2] Palmer PE. Manual of Diagnostic Ultrasound. California: WHO; 2002. 3 p.

[3] Endjun JJ. Ultrasonografi Dasar Obstetri dan Ginekologi. Jakarta: FK UI; 2007. 59 p.

[4] Fetuses S. Choice of Formula and Accuracy of Fetal Weight Estimation in. 2016;71–82.

[5] Aviram A, Yogev Y, Ashwal E, Hiersch L, Hadar E. Prediction of large for gestational age by various sonographic fetal weight estimation formulas — which should we use? J Perinatol [Internet]. 2017;(February 2016):1–5. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jp.2017.5

[6] Shmueli A, Aviram A, Bardin R, Wiznitzer A, Chen R, Gabbay-Benziv R. Effect of fetal presentation on sonographic estimation of fetal weight according to different formulas. Clin Artic. 2017.

[7] Djulaeha E. Ketepatan taksiran berat badan janin dibandingkan dengan berat badan bayi baru lahir. 883:12–7.

[8] Chudleigh T, Thilaganathan B. Obstetric Ultrasound. Third. London: Elsevier; 2004.

[9] Wladimiroff J, Eik-Nes S. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. China: Elsevier; 2009. 35-43p.