Download fulltext HTML
Hendrawan, H., & Amelia, S. (2022). Criteria for the Development and Evaluation of the Implementation of a Sustainable Pedestrian Bridge. KnE Life Sciences, 7(5), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.18502/kls.v7i5.12524

https://doi.org/10.18502/kls.v7i5.12524

statistics

  • 280 Abstract Views
  • 205 PDF Views
  • 0 HTML Views

authors

  • H. Hendrawan

    H. Hendrawan

    Research and Development Agency of West Java Province, Bandung, Indonesia
    https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8406-6677
  • S. Amelia

    S. Amelia

    Directorate General of Bina Marga, Ministry of Public Works and Housing, Jakarta, Indonesia

Published Date

  • Dec 27, 2022

Criteria for the Development and Evaluation of the Implementation of a Sustainable Pedestrian Bridge

KnE Life Sciences / Science and Technology Research Symposium (SIRES) / Pages 175–186

Abstract

The Pedestrian Bridge (Indonesian: JPO) is a vital facility to reduce traffic conflicts and accidents. There is a need to optimize the use of JPO while encouraging sustainable infrastructure development. This requires sustainability criteria. This study aimed to develop and evaluate the implementation of a sustainable JPO criteria in Indonesia by constructing an ”eco JPO” prototype in Surakarta City. A qualitative and quantitative descriptive questionnaire instrument in the form of a Likert scale was used, and further analysis was done using interest performance analysis. The results showed that two criteria must be met, namely, planning criteria and design criteria. Planning criteria included suitability to people’s needs and location. The design criteria included seven measures: attractive design, environmentally friendly, energy self-sufficient, safe, artistic, comfortable, and safe. Based on the evaluation of the design criteria, the overall JPO criteria relatively had the same importance value, namely ”important” with values between 4.47 - 4.85, and weights between 5.8% - 6.57%. The satisfaction aspect showed a somewhat similar value, namely ”satisfied” with the grade between 3.67 - 4.61, and weights between 5.45% - 6.73%.


Keywords: Sustainable, pedestrian bridge, criteria

References
[1] Police of the Republic of Indonesia. Rencana Umum Keselamatan Jalan 2011-2035. Kepolisian Rebuplik Indonesia. Jakarta: 2010.

[2] World Health Organization. Pedestrian safety: a road safety manual for decisionmakers and practitioners. www.who.int/roadsafety/en/ (2013).

[3] Abojaradeh M. Evaluation of Pedestrian Bridges and Pedestrian Safety in Jordan. Civil and Environmental Research. 2013;3:66.

[4] Syarifudin I, Wunas S, Arifi M. The Effectiveness of The Utilization of Pedestrian Bridge (on Perintis Kemerdekaan Road in Makassar City). Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering. 2018;15.

[5] Nunggraeni HA. Efektivitas Penggunaan Jembatan Penyeberangan Orang ( JPO) dan Variabel-variabel yang Mempengaruhi Penyeberang Jalan dalam Menggunakannya (Studi Kasus: Kota Semarang). Fakultas Teknik Jurusan Perencanaan Wilayah Dan Kota. Universitas Diponegoro; 2006.

[6] Koswara ES and Walojodjati E. Efektivitas Penggunaan Jembatan Penyeberangan Orang ( JPO) Studi Kasus pada Fasilitas penyeberangan Orang di Jl. Soekarno Hatta Bandung). Jurnal Konstruksi. 2014;12.

[7] Sinclair M, Zuidgeest M. Investigations into pedestrian crossing choices on Cape Town freeways. Transp Res, Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2016;42:479–94.

[8] Nadjam A, Ferdiansyah M, Sitorus HJ. Efektivitas dan Kepuasan Pengguna Jembatan Penyeberangan Orang ( JPO) di Pasar Induk Kramat Jati. Jurnal Poli-Teknologi 17(1). 2018.

[9] Wu Y, Lu J, Chen H, Wu L. Identification of contributing factors to pedestrian overpass selection. J Traffic Transp Eng. 2014;1(6):415–23.

[10] Rotmeyer J. Can Elevate Pedestrian Walkways be Sustainable?. Sustainable City IV: Urban Regeneration and Sustainability. WIT Transaction on Ecology and The Environment. 2006;293.

[11] Anciaes PR, Jones P. Estimating preferences for different types of pedestrian crossing facilities. Transp Res, Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2018;52:222–37.

[12] Ministry of Public Works of Indonesia. Pedoman Perencanaan, Penyediaan, Dan Pemanfaatan Prasarana Dan Sarana Jaringan Pejalan Kaki Di Kawasan Perkotaan. 2014.

[13] Ministry of Public Works and Housing of Indonesia. Pedoman Perencanaan Teknis Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki Circular Letter of Minister of Public Works and Housing. 2018.

[14] Indraswara MS. Kajian Perilaku Pejalan Kaki Terhadap Pemanfaatan Jembatan Penyeberangan. ENCLOSURE. 2006;5:82.

[15] Demirarslan D. International E-Journal of Advances in Social Sciences. 2017;3:139.

[16] Government NS. Bridge Aesthetics Design Guideline to Improve the Appearance of Bridge in the NSW. Centre for Urban Design Australia; 2019.

[17] Wardiningsih S, Hendarto D. IKRA-ITH TEKNOLOGI. Jurnal Sains & Teknologi. 2019;3:36.

[18] Department of Public Works of Indonesia. Tata Cara Perencanan Jembatan Penyeberangan Untuk Pejalan Kaki Di Area Perkotaan No. 027/T/Bt/1995. 1995.

[19] Azikin MT, Balaka R. STABILITA. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Sipil. 7:47.

[20] Intari DE, Setiawati DN, Eliany M. Analisis Kebutuhan Fasilitas Penyeberangan Jalan di Depan Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa Kota Serang. Fondasi: Jurnal Teknik Sipil. 2019;8(2):163-175.

[21] Department of Public Works of Indonesia. Pedoman Perencanaan Jalur Pejalan Kaki Pada Jalan Umum Director General’s Decision of Bina Marga Number 76/KPTS/Db/1999. 1999.

[22] Korkmaz KA, Syal M. H. R. S, and Korkmaz S. Implementation of Sustainability in Bridge Design, Construction, and Maintenance. Michigan State University: School of Planning, Design, and Construction; 2012.

[23] B. M. Design of Sustainable Bridges Manual For Civil Engineers. Delft University of Technology; 2012.

[24] Hendrawan H, Amelia S. Draft Laporan Akhir Penerapan Terbatas Teknologi Bidang Lalu Lintas. Institute of Road Engineering. Ministry of Public Works and Housing Indonesia; 2019.

[25] National Standardization Agency of Indonesia. Pedoman Perencanaan Pembebanan Jembatan Jalan Raya SNI 03-1725-1989 (1989).

[26] National Standardization Agency of Indonesia. Standar Perencanaan Ketahanan Gempa Untuk Jembatan SNI. 2008;2838:2008.

[27] National Standardization Agency of Indonesia. Tata Cara Perencanaan Teknis Pondasi Sumuran Untuk Jembatan SNI 03-3447-1994. 1994.

[28] National Standardization Agency of Indonesia. Tata Cara Pemasangan Utilitas Di Jalan SNI 03-2850-1992. 1992.

[29] National Standardization Agency of Indonesia. Standar Perencanaan Struktur Baja Untuk Jembatan RSNI T-02- 2005. 2005.

[30] National Standardization Agency of Indonesia. Standar Perencanaan Struktur Beton Untuk Jembatan RSNI T- 03-2005. 2005.

[31] Department of Settlement and Regional Infrastructure. Pedoman Penempatan Utilitas Pada Daerah Milik Jalan Pdt-T-13-2004-B. 2004.

[32] Ministry of Public Works of Indonesia. Pedoman Perancangan Drainase Jembatan Ministry of Public Works and Housing Circular Letter Number 23/SE/M/2015. 2015.

[33] Ministry of Public Works of Indonesia. Pedoman Penyediaan Dan Pemanfaatan Ruang Terbuka Hijau Di Kawasan Perkotaan Ministry of Public Works Regulation No. 05/PRT/M/2008. 2008.

[34] Kurniawan H, Ardi NK. TINGKAT KEPUASAN PENGGUNA FASILITAS PENYEBERANGAN ORANG (STUDI KASUS JPO MUKA KUNING KOTA BATAM). Sigma Teknika. 2018;1(2):162.

[35] Ramadani HN, Rahmani H, Gazali A. Study of efficiency pedestrian bridge crossing in the road of Pangerang Antasari, Banjarmasin. MATEC Web Conf. EDP Sciences; 2018. p. 6009.