Blood Fat Profile of Sentul Chicken with Lactic Acid as an Acidifier in Rations Containing Probiotics

Abstract

The study aimed to evaluate the use of lactic acid as an acidifier in rations containing probiotics on blood fat profile of sentul chicken. Sixty female Sentul chickens aged 6 months were reared for two months in a 20-unit battery cage and subjected to a completely randomized design (CRD) with four treatments and five replicates, with 3 females for each unit. The treatments were R0 : Probiotic basal rations (BS); R1 : BS + 0.5% lactic acid; R2 : BS + 1.0% lactic acid; and R3 : BS + 1.5% lactic acid. Data were analyzed by Analisis of Variance (ANOVA) using an IBM SPSS Statistics ver. 22. The result showed that lactic acid as an acidifier in rations containing probiotics did not significantly (P>0,05) affected blood fat profile (cholesterol, HDL, LDL and triglycerides) of Sentul chicken. The average cholesterol levels were 112.77±26.55 mg/dl; HDL 40.73±9.53 mg/dl; LDL 41.32±24.39 mg/dl; and triglycerides 153.57±46.38 mg/dl. The conclusion was that the use of up to 1.5% lactic acid as an acidifier in feed created similar results in cholesterol, HDL, LDL and triglycerides.


Keywords: Sentul chicken, blood fat, acidifier

References
[1] Muhajir. Turunkan kolesterol ayam kampung dengan lisin. Poultry Indonesia; 2002. 68–69 p.

[2] Hartoyo B, Iriyanti N, Rimbawanto EA. The Use of “Fermeherbafit” (Mixed Herbs) in Broiler Chicken Feed on Performance and Cholesterol profile. Anim Prod. 2019;20(3):139.

[3] Chowdhury SR, Chowdhury SD, Smith TK. Effects of dietary garlic on cholesterol metabolism in laying hens. Poult Sci. 2002;81(12):1856–62.

[4] Fajrina IT, Sumarsih S, ... Pengaruh Pemberian Limbah Pabrik Pakan (Pakan Ceceran) Yang Difermentasi Dengan Starter Fungsional Terhadap Profil Kolesterol Pada Ayam Broiler (the Effect …. Anim Agric J. 2016;3(3):463–8.

[5] Sudha MR, Chauhan P, Dixit K, Babu S, Jamil K. Probiotics as complementary therapy for hypercholesterolemia. Biol Med. 2009;1(4).

[6] iriyanti N, Suhermiyati S. Pemanfaatan Susu Afkir Sebagai Probiotik dan Aplikasinya Dalam Pakan Terhadap Profil Hematologis dan Lemak Darah Ayam Broiler. J Chem Inf Model. 2015;53(1):1–13.

[7] Krismiyanto L, Suthama N, Tristiarti T, Prabowo DE. Penambahan Sari Jeruk Nipis (Citrus aurantifolia) sebagai Acidifier terhadap Profil Lemak Darah pada Ayam Pelung Jantan. Trop Anim Sci. 2020;2(1):27–32.

[8] Basamaciou, H, Ergul M. Research on the factors affecting cholesterol content and some other characteristics of eggs in laying hens: The effects of genotype and rearing system. Turkish J Vet Anim Sci. 2005;29(1):157–64.

[9] Suryo H, Yudiarti T, Isroli. Pengaruh pemberian probiotik sebagai aditif pakan terhadap kadar kolesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL) dan low density lipoprotein (LDL) dalam darah ayam kampung. Anim Agric J. 2012;1(2):228–37.

[10] Murray,R.K., D.A. Bender, K.M. Bothan, P.J. Kennelly, P.A Weil and VWR. Harper’s Illustrated Biochemistry. USA: The Mc Graw-Hill Companies; 2012.

[11] Harini M, Astirin OP. Kadar Kolesterol Darah Tikus Putih (Rattus norvegicus ) Hiperkolesterolemik setela Perlakuan VCO. Nusant Biosci. 2009;1:53–8.

[12] Lehninger, A. L.; D. L. Nelson and MM. Principles of Biochemistry. New York: Worth Publishers; 2000.

[13] Fita, M. Pengaruh Pemberian Ekstrak Temulawak dan Ekstrak Kunyit Melalui Air Minum terhadap Kadar HDL dan LDL Darah Ayam Broiler.

[14] Montgomery R., R. L. Dryer TWC dan AAS. Biokimia Suatu Pendekatan Berorientasi Kasus 2. 1st ed. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press; 1993.

[15] Ganong WF. Buku Ajar Fisiologi Kedokteran (Review of Medical Physiologi). 14th ed. jakarta: EGC; 1995.

[16] Santoso U, Tanaka K, Ohtani S. Effect of dried Bacillus subtilis culture on growth, body composition and hepatic lipogenic enzyme activity in female broiler chicks . Br J Nutr. 1995;74(4):523–9.

[17] Solichedi K, Atmomarsono U, Yunianto VD. Pemanfaatan kunyit (curcuma domestica VAL) dalam ransum broiler sebagai upaya menurunkan lemak abdominal dan kadar kolestrol darah. J Indones Trop Anim Agric. 2003;28(3):172–8