Optimization of the Androgenesis Method in the In Vitro Culture of Anteneson the Basis ofT. AestivumHybrids

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the regularities of the regenerationprocesses of haploid plants, the dependence of in vitro microspore morphogenesis in anther culture on optimization factors, and their efficiency in F1 hybrids of T. aestivumof different ecological and geographicorigin. It was found that heterosis contributed to an increased yield of haploid chlorophyll-bearing regenerants from hybrids obtained from the crossing of parental forms with different responsiveness to androclinia. Results were obtained for the complex optimization of the androgenesis method for the in vitro anther culture of T. aestivum, in order to create diploidized haploid lines (DHL) regardless of the influence of the genotype. The agroecological properties for a complex of economically useful traits were also assessed. DHLs were created that combined high yield (5.1-6.8 t / ha) with lodging resistance (straw height – 60-80 cm) and consistently high grain quality; these were characterized by increased resistance to major leaf diseases in comparison with the standard variety in the conditions of the Central Economic Region of the Non-Black Earth Zone of the Russian Federation.


Keywords: spring soft wheat, androgenesis, embyroidogenesis, callusogenesis, diploidized haploids, in vitro, yield and quality

References
[1] Zhuchenko AA. Resource potential of grain production in Russia. Moscow:Agrorus; 2004.

[2] Davydova NV. Peculiarities of spring wheat cultivation in the nonchernozem zone of Russia. Innovative aspects of scientific support of the agro-industrial complex of the Central Federal District of the Russian Federation. Scientists Nemchinovka - Production. Moscow: MosNIISH; 2015.

[3] Anapiyaev BB. Microspore culture and haploid biotechnology of wheat. Moscow, Moscow Agricultural Academy named after K. A. Timiryazev 2001.

[4] Orlov PA. Cellular and genetic engineering technologies for plant modification. Minsk: Tonpik; 2006.

[5] Barnabas B, Szakacs E, Karsai I, Bedö Z. In vitro androgenesis of wheat: From fundamental to practical application.Euphytica. 2001;119:211-216.

[6] Trukhanovets NL, Orlov PA, Mozgova GV, Malyshev SV, Cartel NA. Evaluation of DNA polymorphism of dihaploid wheat lines, differing in responsiveness to the induction of pollen embryogenesis. Physiology and Biochemistry of Cultivated Plants. 2006. 38(4). 345-352

[7] Pershina LA, Osadchaya TS, Badaeva ED, Belan IA, Rosseeva LP. Study of the peculiarities of androgenesis in the anther culture of varieties and promising forms of spring bread wheat of West Siberian selection, differing in the presence or absence of wheat-alien translocations.VavilovskiyZhurnal Genetics and Breeding. 2013;17(1):40-49.

[8] Torp AM, Hansen AL, Andersen SB. Chromosomal regions associated with green plant regeneration in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) anther culture.Euphytica.2001;119:377-387.

[9] Guzy-Wrobelska J, Szarenko I. Molecular and agronomic evaluation of wheat doubled haploid lines obtained through maize pollination and anther culture methods. Plant Breeding. 2003;122:305-313.

[10] Pershina LA. In vitro cultivation methods in plant biotechnology. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State University; 2000.

[11] Burlutsky VA. Optimization of biotechnology of mass production of in vitro dihaploidized material of spring bread wheat in the system of haploproducerZea mays L. Agrarian Russia. 2012;1:35-40.

12] Evans M, Hastings N, Peacock B. Statistical distribution. 3rd edition. New York: Wiley
(STD); 2000.

[13] Van HE. Statistic for terrified biologists. USA, New Jersey: Blackwell Publishing; 2011.

[14] Nettevich ED, Morgunov AI, Maksimenko MI. Increasing the efficiency of spring wheat selection for stability, productivity and grain quality. Bulletin of Agricultural Science.1985;1:66-73.

[15] Nettevich ED, Chistyakova VN, Smolin VP, Molchanova LM, Kosmacheva IA. Using haploidy to assess the recombination ability and breeding value of the original barley forms. Reports of the Russian Academy of Agricultural Sciences. 1997;3:3-8.