Strategic Spatial Planning Consideration in the Kingdom Vision 2030 and National Physical Planning Plan: Utilizing Content Analysis Methodology for Evaluation and Comparison

Abstract

Urban and regional planning over the time pass through a lot of changes in the 20th century and have been impacted by economic, social and environmental problems. However, old traditional planning approaches were replaced by sustainable approaches to avoid the limitations and improve the results. One of these new approaches known as strategic spatial planning which defined as a long term perspective with clear methodology and strategic vison for critical and important issues in all aspects of economic, social and environment as well as involve stakeholders in this vision through focusing on spatial aspects to achieve sustainable development. The aim of this study is to analyze the content of vision 2030 for Saudi Arabia based on the perspective of spatial strategic planning and compare it with the content of urban national strategy through using same base line. The purpose of this comparison is to explore the achievement of spatial development considerations in the 2030 vision. The literatures review helps to identify the key aspects of strategic spatial planning (economic, social, environmental), as well as identify important considerations associated with each one of them. However, eight considerations were associated with the economical aspect and seven considerations were associated with the social aspect. While, there are five considerations associated with the environmental aspect. By applying content analyses approach; the quantitative analysis of repetitions of the spatial considerations was high in the urban strategy rather than vision 2030 in the overview context. Moreover, there is homogeneity for spatial considerations in the urban strategy with more clarity than vision 2030. Based on the repetitions of spatial considerations in 2030 vision; the vision is focusing more on the economical aspect, social aspect then environmental aspect.

References
[1] Adriq, Majd Omar, (2005), Strategies and Policies for Sustainable and Integrated Planning for Land and Transport Use in Nablus City, An-Najah National University, Palestine.


[2] Al-Jarallah, Ahmad Jarallah and Al-profit, Hussein, (2015), Spatial Dimension in Strategic Plans in Saudi Arabia: Content Analysis Approach, King Saud University Journal, 27, Architecture and Planning, pp. 161-175, Riyadh.


[3] Al-Jarallah, Ahmad Jarallah and Al-Farah, Hussein, (2016), Development of a spatial strategic planning model for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia using the Delphi method, Journal of Gulf Studies and Arabian Peninsula Volume 42, No. 162, Kuwait University, Kuwait.


[4] Al-Zubaidi, Mustafa Jalil, (2011), Strategic Planning of Defensive Mechanisms, University of Baghdad, Iraq.


[5] Assaf, Saleh, (2010), ”Introduction to Research in Behavioral Sciences”, Obeikan Library, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.


[6] Adams, Neil, and others, (2008), Regional Development and Spatial Planning in an Enlarged


[7] Aiden J. and Morgan R.,(1974), Regional Planning A Comprehensive View, Pitman, Great Britain.


[8] Albrechts, Louis, (2004), Strategic (spatial) planning reexamined, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium.


[9] Bussadori, Virna, (2011), Territorial Cohesion and Spatial Planning Considerations and implications on the local level, Autonomous Province of Bolzano.


[10] Hansen, Niles , (1968) “French Regional Planning”, OP. Cit, P. 73


[11] Ministry of Environment,(2007), Building Competitive Cities, New Zealand.


[12] UNITED NATIONS, (2008), Spatial Planning - Key Instrument for Development and Effective Governance with Special Reference to Countries in Transition, New York and Geneva. PP: 2-6.


[13] Young, Greg, (2008), Reshaping Planning with Culture, Macquarie University, Australia