The Impact of Technological Progress in the Spatial Organization of the City Elements
Abstract
The planning process represents a necessary response to the principle of welfare through human requirements and meet the conditions of living and regulating its relations with the surrounding environment in all its elements and components, planning orientations rolled that deal with society as an element of place and spatial
elements And distribution from different views depending on the conditions of the place and its variables.
But all this orientations were focused on improving the lives of individuals and groups and livable urban environment safety and enable individuals to contribute to the planning and the decision taken was to technological progress and rapid tremendous, technical and significant impact on the secretion of a new form of city elements And spatial organization so urban land uses and activities taken new pattern of relationships to function differently than hitherto. The concept of spatial organization underwent a philosophical debates marked by intellectual openness and order mechanisms regulating spatial organization elements outside the closed circuit diagrams which prevailed within the philosophy of modernism, here we will compare between the spatial organization patterns of urban infrastructure concepts modernity and organization structure based on
postmodern concepts That revealed a spatial models suitable for the requirements of the transition to the new situation under conditions of globalization, and what relations and jobs resulting from new technological cities spatial models after a comprehensive conceptual study for a theme to draw the scientific indicators and
results And proposals.
References
[1] Tom Turner,” City as Landscape: A Post-postmodern View of Design and Planning”, Cambridge Rare Books, United Kingdom,1996.
[2] Gottdiener, Mark, and Budd, ” Leslie. Key concepts in urban studies”, Wiltshire: SAGE, 2005.
[3] H. Taubenböck, ”Urban structure analysis of mega city Mexico City using multisensoral remote sensing data”, German Remote Sensing Data Center (DFD),2008.
[4] Andrews, Dimitrovska,” Changes in the Spatial Structure of Central and Eastern European Cities”, Department of Spatial Planing and Architecture, London university,2002.
[5] Rick Robinson,” Seven steps to a Smarter City; and the imperative for taking them”, The Urban Technologist magazine, London,2013.
[6] International Telecommunication Union, 2014, Smart sustainable cities: An analysis of definitions, Focus Group Technical Report, available at http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/focusgroups/ssc/Pages/default.aspx.
[7] J Belissent,” Smart cities: A coming of age”, presented at the CSTD intersessional panel, 2015.
[8] Hartwick, J. & Barki, H., ” Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use”. Management Science, (4),1994.
[9] Peter Marx, Chief Technology Officer, City of Los Angeles, personal communication, January, 2016.
[10] Maki, Norio, Saigai no Jūtakushi ”Housing Monograph of Natural Disaster”, Tokyo: Kajima Shuppannkai, 2012.
[11] Antigone Katsara,” The Impacts of New Technologies on Urban Transformations, Discussion Paper Series, 14(20): 369-380, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece.2014.
[12] GOSPODINI, A, Portraying, Classifying and Understanding the emerging New Landscapes in the Postmodern City, in Cities, Vol. 23(5),2005.