Download fulltext HTML
Ardiani, S., Suryani, M., & Akmalia, N. (2024). Tear Resistance of Laminated and Non-laminated Paperboard Types Ivory and Duplex in Packaging Materials. KnE Engineering, 6(1), 331–343. https://doi.org/10.18502/keg.v6i1.15392

https://doi.org/10.18502/keg.v6i1.15392

statistics

  • 53 Abstract Views
  • 29 PDF Views
  • 0 HTML Views

authors

  • Septia Ardiani

    Septia Ardiani

    Packaging Technology, Polimedia, Jakarta, Indonesia
    https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5249-5285
  • Meuthia Suryani

    Meuthia Suryani

    Packaging Technology, Polimedia, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Nurul Akmalia

    Nurul Akmalia

    Publishing, Polimedia, Jakarta, Indonesia

Published Date

  • Mar 7, 2024

Tear Resistance of Laminated and Non-laminated Paperboard Types Ivory and Duplex in Packaging Materials

KnE Engineering / Jakarta International Conference on Multidisciplinary Studies towards Creative Industries (JICOMS) / Pages 331–343

Abstract

A paperboard is a packaging material that has the disadvantage of being easily torn. One of the techniques used to overcome this is lamination. Two types of paperboard are often used as packaging materials, namely duplex and ivory. This research aimed to analyze the tear resistance comparison between duplex and ivory paperboard types. There are four types of samples in this research, namely duplex non-lamination, duplex lamination, ivory non-lamination, and ivory lamination. The variations of duplex and ivory grammation used include 350 gsm, 300 gsm, 270 gsm, 250 gsm, 230 gsm, and 210 gsm. Measurement of tear resistance refers to SNI 1974:2012 using the Elmendorf method. Each sample was measured for the CD and MD directions. The results showed that for the same grammage, the tear resistance of ivory was greater than that of duplex. The highest increase in tear resistance occurred in duplex and ivory with grammatical 210 gsm. The percentage increase in tear resistance of duplex and ivory with grams of 210 gsm, 230 gsm, 250 gsm is more than 20%, while for higher grams the percentage is less than 15%. The higher the grammage, the lower the percentage increase in tear resistance.


Keywords: paperboard, duplex, ivory, tear resistance

References
[1] Gopinathar P, et al. The Role of Packaging in Manufacturing. J.Bs.M. 2016;18(12):1–07.

[2] Cyrek P. “Packaging as a Source of Information,” Zesz. Nauk. Uniw. S. Probl. Z. Finans. i Mark. 2015;39(866):9–22.

[3] Wyrwa J, Barska A. Packaging as a Source of Information about Food Products. Procedia Eng. 2017;182:770–9.

[4] Aggarwal A, Langowski HC. “Packaging functions: Functional equivalence in yoghurt packaging,” Proc. CIRP, vol. 90, pp. 405–410, 2020,

[5] S. Ardiani, M. Suryani, and N. Akmalia, “Analisis Peningkatan Ketahanan Sobek,” S. T J. Ilmu Pengetah. dan Teknol., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 130–139, 2023, https://doi.org/10.30738/st.vol9.no2.a15209..

[6] Mustafa M, et al. “Looking Back To the Past,” 2nd Reg. Conf. Local Knowl. (KEARIF. TEMPATAN). Jerejak Isl., no. March, pp. 1–7, 2012.

[7] K. S. dan P. K. D. K. Sucipta, IN, “Pengemasan Pangan Kajian Pengemasan Yang Aman, Nyaman, Efektif Dan Efisien,” Udayana Univ. Press, pp. 1–178, 2017.

[8] W. W. Dharosno and A. Pundu, “Analisa Kuat Tarik Pada Kertas Berbahan Dasar Serat Daun Nanas,” J. Teknol. dan Rekayasa, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 46–56, 2020.

[9] Kementerian PR. Mungkinkah Peran Industri Bersandar pada Industri Pulp dan Paper? Kementeri. Perindustrian. 2021;IV:39.

[10] Gordon L. Robertson, Food Packaging and Principles and Practice. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2005.

[11] Deshwal GK, Panjagari NR, Alam T. An overview of paper and paper based food packaging materials: health safety and environmental concerns. J Food Sci Technol. 2019 Oct;56(10):4391–403.

[12] Hauptmann BM, Majschak JP. PAPER PRESENTED AT IAPRI SYMPOSIUM 2011, BERLIN New Quality Level of Packaging Components. Pack. Tech. Sci. 2011;24(May):419–32.

[13] Tugimin T. Panduan Praktis Teknik Pengemasan Hasil Holtikultura untuk Ekspor. 1st ed. Jakarta: Kementerian Pertanian; 2003.

[14] Andhikawati A, et al. “GRAMMATUR AND DENSITY OF VARIOUS TYPES OF PACKAGING PAPERS,” vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1218–1222, 2022.

[15] Nugraha M, Ponadi, Zahra NN. P., and N. N. Zahra, “Analysis of Duplex Cartons Quality Available in the Market,”. Kreator. 2021;4(2): https://doi.org/10.46961/kreator.v4i2.312.

[16] Hummel R Jr, Barrow WJ. “Lamination and other methods of restoration,” in Library trends, vol. 4, no. 3, Chennai: Photolam System P Ltd, 1956, pp. 259–268. [Online]. Available: http://www.bcin.ca/Interface/openbcin.cgi?submit=submit&Chinkey=65067

[17] Zhao Y, Jing S, Zhang X, Chen Z, Zhuo H, Hu Y, et al. Strengthening effects of carboxymethylated hemicellulosic fractions on paper strength. Ind Crops Prod. 2018;125(September):360–9.

[18] Covino C, Sorrentino A, Di Pierro P, Roscigno G, Vece AP, Masi P. Lignocellulosic fibres from enzyme-treated tomato plants: characterisation and application in paperboard manufacturing. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020 Oct;161(October):787–96.

[19] Na Li ZH, Song S, Yu J, Wang Y. Novel fabrication of hydrophobic poly (p-phenylene terephthalamide) paper w. Compos Sci Technol. 2023;243(October).

[20] Biermann CJ. Paper and Its Properties. Handb. Pulping Papermak; 1996. pp. 158–89.

[21] Larsson PT, Lindström T, Carlsson LA, Fellers C. Fiber length and bonding effects on tensile strength and toughness of kraft paper. J Mater Sci. 2018;53(4):3006–15.

[22] Kurniawan AO. Identifikasi Pengaruh Laminasi Terhadap Nilai Ketahanan Sobek Kertas Laminasi Art Carton. Polimedia; 2022.

[23] Koray Gülsoy S. S. Koray GÜLSOY, and S. Si?msi?r, “The Effect of Handsheet Grammage on Strength Properties of Test Liner Papers,” J. Bartin Fac. For. Gelis. 2017;19(1):117– 22.

[24] Prasetyo RA, Mahmudi H. Analisa Pengaruh Kecepatan Produksi Terhadap Gramatur Pembuatan Kertas. J. Mesin Nusant. 2021;4(2):108–13.

[25] Prabowo ET, Muchtar E, Situngkir YY. Analisys of Paper Resistance Two Product Mattpaper. Kreator. 2021;4(1): https://doi.org/10.46961/kreator.v4i1.304.