Model for Knowledge Management with the Ontological Approach in Social Networks
Abstract
The article shows the results of the structure of collective knowledge management (CKM), defined from the concept of research management of research groups in the university with the use of a semantic algorithm. The process begins with the creation of a site in the social network facebook with the subject of the investigative management in the university. Through a structure of dimension given by profile, role, category and subcategory making direct connection with a relational database called MySQL. Through the application of metadata and algorithm is expected to obtain the lessons learned from these groups during the development of their projects. The result is the proposal of a functional scheme that allows the design and creation of a collective knowledge management model as support for university research.
Keywords: Knowledge management, Collective knowledge, Knowledge model, Scientific Production
References
[1] Alsina, M. & Cobarsi-Morales, J. (2010). El papel del capital social en la inteligencia competitiva. Revista General de Información y Documentación, 20, 313-323. [The role of social capital in competitive intelligence. General Journal of Information and Documentation, 20, 313-323]
[2] Bueno, E., Morcillo, P., Rodríguez, J., Luque, M.A. (2003). Knowledge management and knowledge creation in Academia: a study based on surveys in a Japanese research university. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(2), 76-92.
[3] Bueno, E., Salmador, M. P., & Merino, C. (2008). Génesis, concepto y desarrollo del capital intelectual en la economía del conocimiento: Una reflexión sobre el Modelo Intellectus y sus aplicaciones. [Genesis, concept and development of intellectual capital in the knowledge economy: A reflection on the Intellectus Model and its applications]
[4] Brent Robertson BA (2008) A software-based lessons learned management system: enhancing knowledge management in organizations. In: Proceedings of the de IIE annual conference.
[5] Cárdenas J, Spinola M (2013) Role of knowledge management systems within the expertise transfer. In: 2013 Proceedings of the PICMET’13 de Technology Management in the IT-driven services (PICMET).
[6] García-Alsina, M., Gómez-Vargas, M. (2015). Factores influyentes de la gestión del conocimiento en el contexto de la investigación universitaria Información, cultura y sociedad: revista del Instituto de Investigaciones Bibliotecológicas, (33), pp. 29-46 Universidad de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires, Argentina [Factors influencing
knowledge management in the context of university research Information, culture and society: journal of the Institute of Library Research, (33), pp. 29-46 University of Buenos Aires Buenos Aires, Argentina]
[7] García, M. (2011). Análisis de la creación de conocimiento de las TIC en el contexto de la Universidad. Economía industrial, (379), 159-166. [Analysis of the creation of knowledge of ICT in the context of the University. Industrial economics, (379), 159- 166]
[8] Gaviria, M. M., Mejía, A. M., & Henao, D. L. (2007). Gestión del conocimiento en los grupos de investigación de excelencia de la Universidad de Antioquia. Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecología, 30(2), 137-163. [Knowledge management in the research groups of excellence of the University of Antioquia. Inter-American Journal of Library Science, 30 (2), 137-163]
[9] Tian, J., Nakamori, Y. & Wierzbicki, A. P. (2009).
[10] García-Alisina, M., & Gómez-Vargas, M. (2015). Prácticas de gestión del conocimiento en los grupos de investigación: estudio de un caso. Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecología, 38(1), 13-25. [Practices of knowledge management in research groups: case study. Inter-American Journal of Library Science, 38 (1), 13-25]
[11] Hamui, M. (2010). Estructura de organización en la trayectoria de dos grupos de investigación científica de ciencias básicas de la salud en la generación de conocimiento. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 15(46), 713-738. [Organizational structure in the trajectory of two groups of scientific investigation of basic sciences of health in the generation of knowledge. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 15 (46), 713-738]
[12] Haslinda, A., Sarinah, A. (2009) A Review of Knowledge Management Models. The Journal of International Social Research. 2(9), pp.187-198.
[13] Iqbal, S., Toulson, P., & Tweed, D. (2011). HRM Practices and Individual KnowledgeSharing: An Empirical Study of Higher Education Institutions in Pakistan. Trabajo presentado en 8th International Conference on Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Management & Organizational Learning –ICICKM.
[14] Java Bean. (2014). En Wikipedia, la enciclopedia libre. Recuperado el 1 de agosto de 2014 a las 6:15 p.m. de http://es.wikipedia.org/ wiki/JavaBean. [In Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Retrieved on August 1, 2014 at 6:15 p.m. From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JavaBean]
[15] JQuery Foundation T (2013) JQuery API.
[16] Khare, R., Tantek, C. (2006). ”Microformats: a pragmatic path to the semantic web”. Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web, pp. 865–866
[17] Kebede, G. (2010) Knowledge management: An information science perspective. International Journal of Information Management. 30, pp.416-424.
[18] King, G., Muir, P., Richards, (2014). Contextual Components. A Framework for Enterprise Java. http://docs.jboss.org/seam/2.3.0.Final/reference/en-US/html/
[19] Londoño, F. (2005). Un análisis sobre la dinámica de los grupos de investigación en Colombia. Investigación y Desarrollo, 13 (1), 184-203. [An analysis on the dynamics of research groups in Colombia. Research and Development, 13 (1), 184-203]
[20] López-Cruz O, Obregón N. (2015) A network based methodology to reveal patterns in knowledge transfer. Int J Interact Multimed Artif Intell 3(5):67–76.
[21] Mejía, A. (2007). Estructura organizativa de los grupos de investigación de la Universidad de Antioquia como fuente de creación de conocimiento. Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecología, 30(2), 89-102. [Organizational structure of the research groups of the University of Antioquia as a source of knowledge creation. Inter-American Journal of Library Science, 30 (2), 89-102]
[22] Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1995). La organización creadora de conocimiento: cómo las compañías crean la dinámica de la innovación. México: Oxford University Press. [The knowledge-creating organization: how companies create the dynamics of innovation. Mexico: Oxford University Press]
[23] Nonaka I, Peltokorpi V (2006) Objectivity and subjectivity in knowledge management: a review of 20 top articles. Know Process Manag 13(2):73–82.
[24] Ochoa NE. (2012). Estado del arte: El modelo de evaluación de investigación en las universidades Latinoamérica. Bogotá, Colombia. http://revistasdm.ecci.edu.co/index/IngECCI. 2012. [State of the art: The research evaluation model in Latin American universities. Bogota Colombia. Http://revistasdm.ecci.edu.co/index/IngECCI. 2012]
[25] Ochoa Guevara NE., Cruz Bernal IM., y Gil Aros C (2015). Estrategias en la Construcción del Prototipo Inicial para un Modelo Integral en la Gestión Investigativa de la Universidad ECCI orientado hacia el esquema de Negocio. Proyecto GEINVE v1.0. Revista de Publicaciones UNAD 9(3). Pag. 45 – 55. Bogotá, Colombia.
[26] http://hemeroteca.unad.edu.co/revista1/index.php/pi/article/view/1438 [Strategies in the Construction of the Initial Prototype for an Integral Model in the Investigative Management of the ECCI University oriented towards the Business scheme. GEINVE Project v1.0. Journal of Publications UNAD 9 (3). Page 45 - 55. Bogotá, Colombia.
[27] Http://hemeroteca.unad.edu.co/revista1/index.php/pi/article/view/1438]
[28] Ochoa-Guevara, NE., Cruz-Bernal, IM., Ríos JA. (2017). Design and Construction of an Integral Model for Investigative Management in the University GEINVE Project v2.0. Serie: Management Science – Theory and Applications. Binding: Softcover. https: //www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=62582
[29] Peluffo, M. (2010). Gestión del conocimiento tácito: buenas prácticas y lecciones aprendidas en la internacionalización universitaria. Revista de Innovación Educativa, 10 (51), 43–55. [Management of tacit knowledge: good practices and lessons learned in university internationalization. Journal of Educational Innovation, 10 (51), 43-55]
[30] QVT. Query, View, Transformation. (2007). Specification. Final Adopted Specification ptc/07-07-07. OMG.
[31] Rey, J., Martín, M. J. & Sebastián, J. (2008). Estructura y dinámica de los grupos de investigación. ARBOR Ciencia, Pensamiento y Cultura, (732), 743-757. [Structure and dynamics of research groups. ARBOR Science, Thought and Culture, (732), 743-757]
[32] Rivera, S. (2011). Medición de las capacidades de investigación desde el enfoque de Capital Intelectual. XXIV Congreso Internacional de Estrategia SLADE. [Measurement of research capacities from the Intellectual Capital approach. XXIV International Congress of SLADE Strategy]
[33] Sens, J.A. (2011) “Gestión del conocimiento y tecnologías semánticas en inteligencia y defensa”, Inteligencia y Seguridad: Revista de Análisis y Prospectiva, 10 (20, pp: 29-53. [”Knowledge management and semantic technologies in intelligence and defense”, Intelligence and Security: Journal of Analysis and Prospective, 10 (20, pp: 29-53]
[34] Vásquez, F. (2010). Modelo de gestión del conocimiento para medir la capacidad productiva en grupos de investigación. Ciencia, Docencia y Tecnología, 21(41), 101- 125. [Knowledge management model to measure productive capacity in research groups. Science, Teaching and Technology, 21 (41), 101-125]
[35] Wei Wei and Jon Atle Gulla. (2010). Sentiment learning on product reviews via sentiment ontology tree. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL ’10, pages 404413, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.