Successful Primary Coronary Intervention and Invasive Blood Pressure Monitoring During Lund University Cardiopulmonary Assist System (LUCAS) Mechanical Chest Compression: Case Report
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18502/dmj.v8i2.18996الكلمات المفتاحية:
acute myocardial infarction، percutaneous coronary intervention، cardiac arrest، mechanical chest compressors، cardiopulmonary resuscitation، invasive blood pressure monitoringالملخص
Introduction: Acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction demands urgent intervention to restore coronary blood flow, with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as the preferred treatment. However, sudden cardiac arrest remains a significant complication, occurring in approximately 1.3% of PCI patients. In such critical situations, delivering high-quality and uninterrupted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a priority. CPR in acute myocardial infarction presents challenges and opportunities when combined with primary PCI. The key to favorable outcomes is immediate resuscitation efforts and timely revascularization of the occluded artery. However, conflict arises between these actions.
Case Report: We report a case of a 54-year-old male patient who suffered an acute myocardial infarction and underwent successful primary PCI with invasive blood pressure monitoring while being in cardiac arrest, as well continuous CPR with the use of the Lund University Cardiopulmonary Assist System (LUCAS), an automated chest compression device. We documented an invasive blood pressure measurement up to 161/69 mmHg during CPR.
Discussion: Manual CPR in catheterization laboratories is challenging due to space limitations and radiation, especially in cases of refractory prolonged cardiac arrest. Mechanical chest compressors are a potential alternative but their efficacy and practicality are still being explored. Simply because arterial cannulation limits blood pressure measurement, there is little thorough evidence on hemodynamic outcomes with mechanical chest compressions.
Conclusion: The evolution of mechanical CPR in catheterization laboratories necessitates ongoing research and clinical guidelines to optimize its application and ensure optimal patient care.
المراجع
[1] Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, Barbato E, Berry C, Chieffo A, et al.; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct;44(38):3720–3826. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad191 PMID:37622654 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad191
[2] Webb JG, Solankhi NK, Chugh SK, Amin H, Buller CE, Ricci DR, et al. Incidence, correlates, and outcome of cardiac arrest associated with percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2002 Dec;90(11):1252–1254. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(02)02846-1 PMID:12450610 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(02)02846-1
[3] Panchal AR, Bartos JA, Caba nas JG, Donnino MW, Drennan IR, Hirsch KG, et al.; Adult Basic and Advanced Life Support Writing Group. Part 3: Adult basic and advanced life support: 2020 American heart association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2020 Oct;142(16_suppl_2 suppl_2):S366–468. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000916 PMID:33081529 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000918
[4] Yadav K, Truong HT. Cardiac arrest in the catheterization laboratory. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2018;14(2):115– 120. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573403X14666180509144512 PMID:29741141 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/1573403X14666180509144512
[5] Lott C, Truhlář A, Alfonzo A, Barelli A, González-Salvado V, Hinkelbein J, et al.; ERC Special Circumstances Writing Group Collaborators. European resuscitation council guidelines 2021: Cardiac arrest in special circumstances. Resuscitation. 2021 Apr;(161):152–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.011 PMID:33773826 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.011
[6] Mitchell OJ, Shi X, Abella BS, Girotra S. Mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation during in-hospital cardiac arrest. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Apr;12(7):e027726. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.027726 PMID:36942764 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.027726
[7] Wagner H, Hardig BM, Rundgren M, Zughaft D, Harnek J, Götberg M, et al. Mechanical chest compressions in the coronary catheterization laboratory to facilitate coronary intervention and survival in patients requiring prolonged resuscitation efforts. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 Jan;24(1):4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0198-3 PMID:26795941 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0198-3
[8] Venturini JM, Retzer E, Estrada JR, Friant J, Beiser D, Edelson D, et al. Mechanical chest compressions improve rate of return of spontaneous circulation and allow for initiation of percutaneous circulatory support during cardiac arrest in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Resuscitation. 2017 Jun;(115):56– 60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.03.037 PMID:28377296 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.03.037
[9] Low CJ, Ramanathan K, Ling RR, Ho MJ, Chen Y, Lorusso R, et al. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults with cardiac arrest: A comparative meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Lancet Respir Med. 2023 Oct;11(10):883–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00137-6 PMID:37230097 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00137-6
[10] Zhong H, Yin Z, Wang Y, Shen P, He G, Huang S, et al. Comparison of prognosis between extracorporeal CPR and conventional CPR for patients in cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Emerg Med. 2024;24(128). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-024-01058-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-024-01058-y
[11] Mazzeffi M, Zaaqoq A, Curley J, Buchner J, Wu I, Beller J, et al. Survival after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation based on in-hospital cardiac arrest and cannulation location: An analysis of the extracorporeal life support organization registry. Crit Care Med. 2024 Dec;52(12):1906–1917. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006439 PMID:39382377 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006439
[12] Han J, Ahn KJ, Cha KC, Kim SJ, Jung WJ, Roh YI, et al. Prediction of blood pressure using chest compression waveform during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2024 Sep;202:110331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110331 PMID:39053839 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110331
[13] Kalogeropoulos AS, Kennon S, Karamasis GV, Smith EJ, Rees P. Successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction during resuscitation from cardiac arrest by combined mechanical chest compressions and intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation: A case report. A A Pract. 2018 Jun;10(12):323–326. https://doi.org/10.1213/XAA.0000000000000707 PMID:29634573 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1213/XAA.0000000000000707
[14] Mälberg J, Smekal D, Marchesi S, Lipcsey M, Rubertsson S. Suction cup on a pistonbased chest compression device improves coronary perfusion pressure and cerebral oxygenation during experimental cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resusc Plus. 2022;12:100311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100311
[15] Han Y, Hu H, Shao Y, Deng Z, Liu D. The link between initial cardiac rhythm and survival outcomes in in-hospital cardiac arrest using propensity score matching, adjustment, and weighting. Sci Rep. 2024;14(7621). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-58468-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-58468-y
التنزيلات
منشور
كيفية الاقتباس
إصدار
القسم
الرخصة
الحقوق الفكرية (c) 2025 Sadeq Tabatabai, Ali Khalifeh, Jasem Mohammed Alhashmi
هذا العمل مرخص بموجب Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
