Ovarian reserve in women with endometriosis under total cystectomy compared to partial cystectomy: A randomized clinical trial

Abstract

Background: The standard procedure for ovarian endometriosis is laparoscopic excision of ovarian cysts and complete removal of the cyst capsule using the striping technique. Owing to the possibility of reducing ovarian reserve, and in some cases, the premature ovarian failure, the safety remains to be known.


Objective: To compare the ovarian reserve in women with endometriosis who underwent total cystectomy with partial cystectomy.


Materials and Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, 56 women with endometriosis who were referred to the Research and Clinical Center for Infertility and Shahid Sadoughi Hospital, Yazd, Iran between January and February 2020 were randomly assigned into two groups (n = 25/each); group I (total cystectomy) and group II (partial cystectomy). To assess the ovarian reserves, the anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) level before and three months after surgery was measured and compared between the two groups.


Results: No significant difference was observed in the AMH levels before and after surgery (p = 0.52, p = 0.32, respectively). However, the mean reduction of AMH in total cystectomy group was significantly higher than the partial cystectomy (p = 0.001).


Conclusion: Cystectomy in women with endometriosis reduces ovarian reserve and can help maintain some ovarian reserve by performing partial instead of total cystectomy.


Key words: Anti-Müllerian hormone, Endometriosis, Cystectomy, Ovarian reserve.

References
[1] Kennedy S, Bergqvist A, Chapron Ch, D’Hooghe Th, Dunselman G, Greb R, et al. ESHRE guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 2698–2704.

[2] Taniguchi F, Sakamoto Y, Yabuta Y, Azuma Y, Hirakawa E, Nagira K, et al. Analysis of pregnancy outcome and decline of anti−Müllerian hormone after laparoscopic cystectomy for ovarian endometriomas. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2016; 42: 1534–1540.

[3] Parazzini F, Roncella E, Cipriani S, Trojano G, Barbera V, Herranz B, et al. The frequency of endometriosis in the general and selected populations: A systematic review. J Endometr Pelvic Pain Disord 2020; 12: 176–189.

[4] Ozaki R, Kumakiri J, Tinelli A, Grimbizis F, Kitade M, Takeda S. Evaluation of factors predicting diminished ovarian reserve before and after laparoscopic cystectomy for ovarian endometriomas: A prospective cohort study. J Ovarian Res 2016; 9: 37–46.

[5] Ding Y, Yuan Y, Ding J, Chen Y, Zhang X, Hua K. Comprehensive assessment of the impact of laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy on ovarian reserve. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2015; 22: 1252–1259.

[6] Donnez J, Lousse JC, Jadoul P, Donnez O, Squifflet J. Laparoscopic management of endometriomas using a combined technique of excisional (cystectomy) and ablative surgery. Fertil Steril 2010; 94: 28–32.

[7] Kyama CM, Mihalyi A, Gevaert O, Waelkens E, Simsa P, Van de Plas R, et al. Evaluation of endometrial biomarkers for semi-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis. Fertil Steril 2011; 95: 1338–1343. e3.

[8] Kao LC, Germeyer A, Tulac S, Lobo S, Yang JP, Taylor RN, et al. Expression profiling of endometrium from women with endometriosis reveals candidate genes for disease-based implantation failure and infertility. Endocrinology 2003; 144: 2870–2881.

[9] Nasu K, Yuge A, Tsuno A, Nishida M, Narahara H. Involvement of resistance to apoptosis in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Histol Histopathol 2009; 24: 1181–1192.

[10] Zeitoun K, Takayama K, Sasano H, Suzuki T, Moghrabi N, Andersson S, et al. Deficient 17β- hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 expression in endometriosis: Failure to metabolize 17β-estradiol. J Clin Endocrinol Metabo 1998; 83: 4474–4480.

[11] Alborzi S, Keramati P, Younesi M, Samsami A, Dadras N. The impact of laparoscopic cystectomy on ovarian reserve in patients with unilateral and bilateral endometriomas. Fertil Steril 2014; 101: 427– 434.

[12] Viganò P, Parazzini F, Somigliana E, Vercellini P. Endometriosis: Epidemiology and aetiological factors. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2004; 18: 177–200.