Increased rate of elective cesarean delivery following assisted reproductive technology: A letter to the editor


This is a Letter to Editor and does not have an abstract.

[1] Macaluso M, Wright-Schnapp TJ, Chandra A, Johnson R, Satterwhite CL, Pulver A, et al. A public health focus on infertility prevention, detection, and management. Fertil Steril 2010; 93: 16. e1–e10.

[2] Gillet E, Martens E, Martens G, Cammu H. Prelabour caesarean section following IVF/ICSI in older-term nulliparous women: too precious to push? J Pregnancy 2011; 2011: 362518.

[3] Qin JB, Wang H, Sheng X, Xie Q, Gao S. Assisted reproductive technology and risk of adverse obstetric outcomes in dichorionic twin pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2016; 105: 1180–1192.

[4] Sullivan EA, Chapman MG, Wang YA, Adamson GD. Population‐based study of cesarean section after in vitro fertilization in Australia. Birth 2010; 37: 184–191.

[5] Chien LY, Lee YH, Lin YH, Tai CJ. Women who conceived with infertility treatment were more likely to receive planned cesarean deliveries in Taiwan. Hum Fertil 2015; 18: 141–148.

[6] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College); Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, Rouse DJ. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210: 179–193.

[7] Allot L, Payne D, Dann L. Midwifery and Assisted Reproductive Technologies. New Zealand College Midwive Journal 2013; 47: 10–13.

[8] Azami-Aghdash S, Ghojazadeh M, Dehdilani N, Mohammadi M, Asl Amin Abad R. Prevalence and causes of cesarean section in Iran: systematic review and meta-analysis. Iran J Public Health 2014; 43: 545–555.