School girls and childbearing motives: A randomized clinical trial through hidden curriculum
Background: Childbearing motives are considered as the primary stimulus of fertility and the importance of making fertility decisions in humans.
Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the effect of a new form of interactional program on the childbearing motives of students.
Materials and Methods: According to a well-defined, single-blind randomized controlled trial, we selected eight government schools in Tehran. Students in the age range of 7-12 yr and 16-18 yr (130 students in each school with a total number of 260) were selected for a series of intervention from storytelling to free discussion on a special subject through the concept of hidden curriculum. We evaluate the outcome with pretest-posttest based on the Miller childbearing motives questionnaire. One month after the last intervention, final evaluation took place.
Results: The findings showed that after an intervention conducted in the best way, all positive scores were promoted while the negative ones declined. One the other hand, no matter what really the participant’s groups were, their total intention score got better. In this way, the total positive scores were significantly increased in the intervention groups (p = 0.000) Also, the students in high school significantly improved in positive scores and the negative score decreased in them.
Conclusion: This study showed that the fundamental childbearing motives even with small interventions can be improved. Our intervention could improve the positive childbearing motives among school girls. In this regard, the role of some confounding factor such as the role of some confounding factors such as religious beliefs in family, maternal education is most important.
Key words: Childbearing, Motive, School, Adolescents, Intention.
 Gray E, Evans A, Reimondos A. Childbearing desires of childless men and women: when are goals adjusted? Adv Life Course Res 2013; 18: 141–149.
 Guedes M, Pereira M, Pires R, Carvalho P, Canavarro MC. Childbearing motivations scale: construction of a new measure and its preliminary psychometric properties. J Child Fam Stud 2015; 24: 180–194.
 Hellerstedt WL, Pirie PL, Lando HA, Curry SJ, McBride CM, Grothaus LC, et al. Differences in preconceptional and prenatal behaviors in women with intended and unintended pregnancies. Am J Public Health 1998; 88: 663–666.
 Hannula MS. Motivation in mathematics: goals reflected in emotions. Educational Studies in Mathematics 2006; 63: 165–178.
 Amerian M, Kariman N, Janati P, Salmani F. [The Role of Individual factors in decision making for the first Childbearing]. Payesh 2016; 15: 143–151. (in Persian)
 Tavousi M, Motlagh ME, Eslami M, Haerimehrizi A, Hashemi A, Montazeri A. [Fertility desire and its correlates: A pilot study among married citizens living in Tehran, Iran]. Payesh 2015; 14: 597–605. (in Persian)
 Khadivzade T, Arghavani E. Religious Beliefs and Fertility Preferences among Engaged Couples, Referring to Premarital Counseling Centers of Mashhad, Iran. J Midwif Reprod Health 2014; 2: 238–245.
 Kost K, Landry DJ, Darroch JE. Predicting maternal behaviors during pregnancy: Does intention status matter? Fam Plann Perspect 1998; 30: 79–88.
 Farrokh-Eslamlou HR, Vahabzadeh Z, Moeini SR, Moghaddam Tabrizi F. [Pre-marriage couples`fertility attitude following recent childbearing persuative policies in Iran.] The Journal of Urmia Nursing and Midwifery Faculty 2013; 11: 836–845. (in Persian)
 Qazi YS. Adolescent reproductive health in Pakistan. To wards adulthood: exploring the Sexual and reproductive health of adolescents in South Asia Geneva: World Health Organization.2003:78–80.
 Kiara R. Belonging and learning to belong in school: the implications of the hidden curriculum for indigenous students. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. 2013; 34: 660–672.
 Myles BS, Simpson RL. Understanding the hidden curriculum: An essential social skill for children and youth with asperger syndrome. Intervent School Clin 2001; 36: 279–286.
 Myles BS, Trautman ML, Schelvan RL. The hidden curriculum for understanding unstated rules in social situations for adolescents and young adults. 2nd Ed. Kansas: AAPC Publishing; 2013.
 Lee HJ. Cultural factors related to the hidden curriculum for students with autism and related disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic 2011; 46: 141–149.
 Myles BS, Simpson RL. Asperger syndrome: A guide for educators and parents. Texas: Austin PRO-ED; 1998.
 Safabakhsh L, Nazemzade M. [The effect of health promotion education on high school students’ lifestyle.] Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2013: 13: 58–65. (in Persian)
 Javadnoori M, Latifnejad Roudsari R, Female adolescents’ experiences and perceptions regarding sexual health education in Iranian schools: A qualitative content analysis. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2012 Nov-Dec; 17(7): 539–546. PMID: 23922603.
 Fattahi Z, Masoumi SZ, Soltani F, Roshanaei Gh. The effect of educating mother on the girls’ knowledge level of reproductive health. Payesh 2017; 16: 627–635.
 K.G. Santhya, Usha Ram. Associations Between Early Marriage and Young Women's Marital and Reproductive Health Outcomes: Evidence from India. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health Vol. 36, No. 3 (SEPTEMBER 2010), pp. 132–139.
 Khadivzadeh T, Arghavani E, Shakeri MT. [Relationship between fertility motivations and preferences in couples]. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil 2014; 17: 8–18. (in Persian)
 Rubin V, East PL. Adolescents’ pregnancy intentions: Relations to life situations and caretaking behaviors prenatally and 2 years postpartum. Journal of Adolescent Health 1999; 24: 313–320.
 Hayford SR, Agadjanian V. From desires to behavior: Moderating factors in a fertility transition. Demogr Res 2012; 26: 511–542.
 Watanabe Y, Lee K. Children's motives for admitting to prosocial behavior. Front Psychol 2016; 7: 220.
 Berrington A, Pattaro S. Educational differences in fertility desires, intentions and behaviour: A life course perspective. Adv Life Course Res 2014; 21: 10–27.