Download fulltext
HTML
Moradi, Y. (2023). The relationship between body mass index and preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine (IJRM), 20(12), 1051–1052. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v20i12.12568
https://doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v20i12.12568
statistics
- 93 Abstract Views
- 58 PDF Views
- 0 HTML Views
authors
-
Yousef Moradi
Yousef Moradi
Social Determinant of the Health Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran.
Published Date
- Jan 9, 2023
The relationship between body mass index and preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
This is a letter to the editor and does not have an abstract. Please download the article PDF or view it in HTML.
References
[1] Motedayen M, Rafiei M, Rezaei Tavirani M, Sayehmiri K, Dousti M. The relationship between body mass index and preeclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Reprod BioMed 2019; 17: 463–472.
[2] Macaskill P, Walter SD, Irwig L. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. Stat Med 2001; 20: 641–654.
[3] Peters JL, Sutton AJ, Jones DR, Abrams KR, Rushton L. Comparison of two methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. JAMA 2006; 295: 676–680.
[4] Doucouliagos H, Stanley TD. Publication selection bias in minimum-wage research? A meta-regression analysis. British Journal of Industrial Relations 2009; 47: 406–428.
[5] Cooper H, Hedges LV. The hand book of research synthesis. New York: Russell sage foundation; 1994.
[6] Bland JM, Kerry SM. Statistica notes. Weighted comparison of means. BMJ 1998; 316: 129.
[7] Karchevsky M, Babb JS, Schweitzer ME. Can diffusion-weighted imaging be used to differentiate benign from pathologic fractures? A meta-analysis. Skeletal Radiol 2008; 37: 791–795.
[8] Devine EC, Westlake SK. The effects of psychoeducational care provided to adults with cancer: Meta-analysis of 116 studies. Oncol Nurs Forum 1995; 22: 1369–1381.
[9] Schwarzer G. Meta: An R package for meta-analysis. R News 2007; 7: 40–45.
[2] Macaskill P, Walter SD, Irwig L. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. Stat Med 2001; 20: 641–654.
[3] Peters JL, Sutton AJ, Jones DR, Abrams KR, Rushton L. Comparison of two methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. JAMA 2006; 295: 676–680.
[4] Doucouliagos H, Stanley TD. Publication selection bias in minimum-wage research? A meta-regression analysis. British Journal of Industrial Relations 2009; 47: 406–428.
[5] Cooper H, Hedges LV. The hand book of research synthesis. New York: Russell sage foundation; 1994.
[6] Bland JM, Kerry SM. Statistica notes. Weighted comparison of means. BMJ 1998; 316: 129.
[7] Karchevsky M, Babb JS, Schweitzer ME. Can diffusion-weighted imaging be used to differentiate benign from pathologic fractures? A meta-analysis. Skeletal Radiol 2008; 37: 791–795.
[8] Devine EC, Westlake SK. The effects of psychoeducational care provided to adults with cancer: Meta-analysis of 116 studies. Oncol Nurs Forum 1995; 22: 1369–1381.
[9] Schwarzer G. Meta: An R package for meta-analysis. R News 2007; 7: 40–45.