Download fulltext HTML

https://doi.org/10.18502/espoch.v3i1.14482

statistics

  • 121 Abstract Views
  • 52 PDF Views
  • 0 HTML Views

authors

  • W. Vanegas

    W. Vanegas

    Corporación Universitaria del Meta. Colombia.
  • L. Carvajal

    L. Carvajal

    Instituto Ecuatoriano de Seguridad Social. Seguro Social Campesino. Guayaquil.
  • D. D. Peñafiel

    D. D. Peñafiel

    Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Humanísticas, Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral, ESPOL, Campus Gustavo Galindo, km30.5 Vía perimetral, Centro de Investigaciones Rurales, PO.BOX 09-01-5863, Guayaquil, Ecuador
    https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6593-8217
  • R. L. Espinel

    R. L. Espinel

    Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Humanísticas, Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral, ESPOL, Campus Gustavo Galindo, km30.5 Vía perimetral, Centro de Investigaciones Rurales, PO.BOX 09-01-5863, Guayaquil, Ecuador

Published Date

  • Nov 9, 2023

Nutrition is Perceived as an Ecosystem Service of the Mangrove by Rural People in Ecuador

ESPOCH Congresses: The Ecuadorian Journal of S.T.E.A.M. / Volume 3 Issue 1 / Pages 709–729

Abstract

The mangrove ecosystem is considered as the source of livelihood, particularly for coastal areas. This study explores the perception of the inhabitants of Puerto El Morro and the island of Costa Rica (Ecuador) against the ecosystem services of the mangrove. Seven quantitative variables were used on the Likert scale by performing exploratory factor analysis. The results were based on a sample of 94 participants finding 2 factors, tourism (29.07% of variance) and nutritious food production (25.45% of variance remaining). The reliability of the questionnaire was acceptable according to Cronbach’s Alpha 0.654. A confirmatory factor analysis is necessary to revalidate the items of the factors.


Keywords: coastal communities, eating, mangroves, livelihoods, nutrition.


Resumen


El ecosistema de manglar se considera fuente de medios de vida, en particular para zonas costeras. Este estudio explora la percepción de los habitantes de Puerto El Morro y la isla Costa Rica (Ecuador) frente a los servicios ecosistémicos del manglar. Se utilizaron 7 variables cuantitativas en escala de Likert realizando análisis factorial exploratorio. Los resultados parten de una muestra de 94 participantes, hallando 2 factores: turismo (29,07% de varianza) y producción alimentos nutritivos (25,45% de varianza restante). La confiabilidad del cuestionario fue aceptable según el Alfa de Cronbach 0.654. Es necesario un análisis factorial confirmatorio para revalidar los ítems de los factores.


Palabras Clave: comunidades costeras; alimentación; manglares; medios de vida; nutrición.

References
[1] MAE and FAO. Árboles y Arbustos de los Manglares del Ecuador. Quito, Ecuador; 2014.

[2] Roy AK, Alam K, Gow J. Community perceptions of state forest ownership and management: a case study of the Sundarbans Mangrove Forest in Bangladesh. Journal of Environmental Management. 2013 Mar;117:141–149.

[3] Damastuti E, de Groot R. Effectiveness of community-based mangrove management for sustainable resource use and livelihood support: A case study of four villages in Central Java, Indonesia. Journal of Environmental Management. 2017 Dec;203(Pt 1):510–521.

[4] Villegas C, Berrouet L, López C, Ruiz A, Upegui A. Lessons from the integrated valuation of ecosystem services in a developing country: Three case studies on ecological, socio-cultural and economic valuation. Ecosystem Services. 2016;22:297–308.

[5] Shams UM, de R Van SE, Mishka S, Rahman S.MA. “Economic valuation of provisioning and cultural services of a protected mangrove ecosystem: A case studyon Sundarbans Reserve Forest, Bangladesh”. Ecosystem Services. 2013;5:88–93.

[6] Invemar Carbono, Bosques, CVS. “Guía Metodológica para el desarrollo de proyectos tipo REDD+ en ecosistemas de manglar: Elaborada con base en la experiencia del proyecto piloto tipo REDD+ del DMI Cispata, La Balsa, Tinajones y sectores aledaños del Delta Estuarino río Sinú,” Santa Marta, 2015.

[7] FAO. Global Forest Resources Assessment. Roma, Italia; 2010.

[8] Vo QT, Kuenzer C, Vo QM, Moder F, Oppelt N, VQ Tuan, C Kuenzer, VQ Minh, F Moder, N Oppelt. “Review of valuation methods for mangrove ecosystem services”. Ecological Indicators. 2012;23:431–446.

[9] FAO. The world’s mangroves 1980- 2005. Roma, Italia, 2007.

[10] Owuor MA, Icely J, Newton A. Community perceptions of the status and threats facing mangroves of Mida Creek, Kenya: implications for community based management. Ocean & Coastal Management. 2019;175:172–179.

[11] Tanner MK, Moity N, Costa MT, Jarrin JR, Aburto OO, Salinas de León P. Mangroves in the Galapagos: Ecosystem services and their valuation. Ecological Economics. 2019;160:12–24.

[12] Turner W, Brandon K, Brooks T, Costanza R, Fonseca G, Portela R. Global conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Bioscience. 2007;57(10):868– 873.

[13] Vide PD, Briansó MM. “Estudio multidisciplinario del ecosistema manglar en la comunidad tradicional de Curral Velho : Análisis de los servicios ecosistémicos producidos por los manglares a partir de la percepción de la comunidad de Curral Velho.” Ciències del medi Ambient. 2014;5(04):23.

[14] Roy AK. Determinants of participation of mangrove-dependent communities in mangrove conservation practices. Ocean & Coastal Management. 2014;98:70–78.

[15] Marín MJ, Hernández AM, Silva RE, Moreno CP. Percepciones sobre servicios ambientales y pérdida de humedales arbóreos en la comunidad de Monte Gordo, Veracruz. Madera Bosques. 2016;22:53–69.

[16] Cevallos MIV, Cortez MFL, Hurtado YNE. “Evaluación del uso recreativo y turístico del refugio de vida silvestre manglares El Morro.” Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral, Facultad de Ingeniería Marítima y Ciencias del Mar. 2010.

[17] El Morro GA. Plan de desarrollo y ordenamiento territorial del GAD parroquial El Morro. Ecuador: El Morro; 2015.

[18] Jambelí GA. Plan de desarrollo y ordenamiento territorial del GAD parroquial Jambelí. Ecuador: Jambelí; 2015.

[19] Bernal CA. Metodología de la investigación. Pearson Ed. Bogota, Colombia, 2010.

[20] Ecosystem AM. “Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis,” Washington, DC, 2005.

[21] Jachowski NR, Quak MS, Friess DA, Duangnamon D, Webb EL, Ziegler AD. Mangrove biomass estimation in Southwest Thailand using machine learning. Applied Geography. 2013;45:311–321.

[22] George D, Mallery P. SPSS for Windows step-by-step: A simple guide and reference. 7th edition. Belmont (CA): EE UU; 2006.

[23] Sthapit B, Rana R, Eyzaguirre P, Jarvis D. The value of plant genetic diversity to resource-poor farmers in Nepal and Vietnam. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability. 2008;6(2):148–166.

[24] Hair JF, Black B, Babin B, Anderson RL, Rolph E, Tatham. Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th edition. New Jersey, 2006.

[25] Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.