https://doi.org/10.18502/sjms.v16i4.9949
statistics
- 803 Abstract Views
- 587 PDF Views
- 0 HTML Views
authors
-
B.S. Weerakoon
B.S. Weerakoon
Department of Radiography & Radiotherapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, 20400, Sri Lanka
-
I.G.N.N.K. Karunaratne
I.G.N.N.K. Karunaratne
Department of Radiography & Radiotherapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, 20400, Sri Lanka
-
.M.W.S. Jayasundara
.M.W.S. Jayasundara
Department of Radiography & Radiotherapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, 20400, Sri Lanka
Published Date
- Dec 31, 2021
Practice and Perception of Radiographers on the Positioning Techniques of Erect Lateral Cervical Spine Radiography in Non-trauma Adult Patients
Abstract
Background: The visualization of the lower cervical spine (C-spine), including the C7-T1 junction on lateral radiograph is a challenge due to the overlapping of the shoulder girdle. Therefore, the radiographers have adapted different positioning strategies to overcome this challenge. This study explores the current practice and perception of radiographers on positioning techniques of erect lateral cervical spine radiography in non-trauma adult patients.
Methods: This prospective study was conducted with a self-administered, structured questionnaire distributed among 50 radiographers working in four selected hospitals in Sri Lanka.
Results: The radiographers used weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing positioning techniques for the erect lateral C-spine radiography. Most of them employed the standing breath-holding technique for image acquisition with or without exertion. While 54% of the radiographers utilized two water-filled cans during the weight-bearing technique, 82% used holding arms back with the shoulders down and pulling as low as possible in the non-weight-bearing technique. In addition, 88% of the radiographers believed that the weight-bearing position could increase the visibility of the C-spine. Almost all the radiographers (100%) stated that correct positioning instruction could improve the visibility of the C-spine.
Conclusion: Radiographers have mainly used two positioning techniques of weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing for erect lateral C-spine radiography for non-trauma adult patients. In addition, most radiographers had a positive attitude toward the weight-bearing technique in the evaluation of lateral C-spine. These results highlight the importance of conducting studies to evaluate the effectiveness of the weight-bearing technique in erect lateral C-spine radiography.
Keywords:
cervical spine, erect lateral radiography, positioning techniques, current practice, non-trauma adult patients
References
[2] Joaquim, A. F., Ghizoni, E., Tedeschi, H., et al. (2015). Radiological evaluation of cervical spine involvement in rheumatoid arthritis. Neurosurgical Focus, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 1–7.
[3] Toksoy, A., Bektas, F., Eken, C., et al. (2010). Value of the swimming position and arm traction in visualizing the cervicothoracic junction over the standard lateral cervical X-ray. International Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 85–90.
[4] Rhea, J. T., Rao, P. M., and Novelline, R. A. (1998). The normal cervical spine and its variations on plain radiography and computed tomography. Emergency Radiology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 13–28.
[5] Rethnam, U., Yesupalan, R. S. U., and Bastawrous, S. S. (2008). The Swimmer’s view: does it really show what it is supposed to show? A retrospective study. BMC Medical Imaging, vol. 8, article 2.
[6] Truong, V. T., Al-Shakfa, F., Boubez, G., et al. (2020). Enhanced visualization of the cervical vertebra during intraoperative fluoroscopy using a shoulder traction device. Asian Spine Journal, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 502–506.
[7] Wongwaisayawan, S., Suwannanon, R., and Kaewlai, R. (2013). Imaging of cervicothoracic junction trauma. Reports Medical Imaging, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 11–27.
[8] Whitley, A. S. (2015). Clarks Positioning In Radiography (13th ed.). CRC Press.
[9] Rauck, R., Stammen, K., Yu, E., et al. (2016). Novel intraoperative technique to visualize the lower cervical spine: a case series. American Journal of Orthopedics, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 46–49.
[10] Maruyama, T. and Yamamoto, H. (2008). Study of positioning techniques for radiography. Nippon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 25–34.
[11] Kapur, N., Nargotra, N., Singh, T., et al. (2019). Study of proper technique to avoid repeat radiography with proper instructions and positioning. International Journal of Radiation Research, vol. 33, pp. 33–37.
[12] Du, L., Gao, Y., Gao, K., et al. (2020). Lateral position versus prone position for cervical laminoplasty: a retrospective comparative study. Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, vol. 16, pp. 133–140.
[13] Okada, E., Matsumoto, M., Ichihara, D., et al. (2009). Does the sagittal alignment of the cervical spine have an impact on disk degeneration? Minimum 10-year follow-up of asymptomatic volunteers. European Spine Journal, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 1644–1651.
[14] Nojiri, K., Matsumoto, M., Chiba, K., et al. (2003). Relationship between alignment of upper and lower cervical spine in asymptomatic individuals. Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 80–83.
[15] Yukawa, Y., Kato, F., Suda, K., et al. (2012). Age-related changes in osseous anatomy, alignment, and range of motion of the cervical spine. Part I: radiographic data from over 1,200 asymptomatic subjects. European Spine Journal, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 1492–1498.
[16] Park, S.-M., Song, K.-S., Park, S.-H., et al. (2014). Does whole-spine lateral radiograph with clavicle positioning reflect the correct cervical sagittal alignment? European Spine Journal, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 57–62.
[17] Park, M. S., Moon, S. H., Kim, T. H., et al. (2015). Radiographic comparison between cervical spine lateral and whole-spine lateral standing radiographs. Global Spine Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 118–123.
[18] Marks, M., Stanford, C., and Newton, P. (2009). Which lateral radiographic positioning technique provides the most reliable and functional representation of a patient’s sagittal balance? Spine, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 949–954.
[19] Carver, E. and Carver, B. (2012). Medical Imaging: Techniques, Reflection & Evaluation [Internet] (2nd ed.). Elsevier Health Sciences. Retrieved from: https://books.google.lk/books?redir_esc=y&id=j8vohIcgiiAC&q=cervical#v=snippet&q=cervical&f=false (accessed 2020 April 25).
[20] Ireland, A. J., Britton, I., and Forrester, A. W. (1998). Do supine oblique views provide better imaging of the cervicothoracic junction than swimmer’s views? Emergency Medicine Journal, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 151–154.
[21] Bowe, C. T., Burton, J. H., Chandler, R. C., et al. (2003). The effect of arm traction on the adequacy of cross-table lateral cervical spine radiographs. Journal of Trauma, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 800–801.
[22] Boger, D. and Ralls, P. W. (1981). New traction device for radiography of the lower cervical spine. American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 467–469.
[23] Norris, C. S., Silva, W. E., Dodson, T. F., et al. (1986). Shoulder harness traction for roentgenographic assessment of the cervical spine. Archives of Surgery, vol. 121, no. 4, pp. 452–455.
[24] Pate, D. (2012 September 23). Getting a good view of the cervicothoracic junction: swimmer’s lateral view. Dynamic Chiropractic, vol. 30, no. 20. Retrieved from: https://www.dynamicchiropractic.com/mpacms/dc/article.php?id=56132 (accessed 2020 April 24).
[25] Berquist, T. H. (1988). Imaging of adult cervical spine trauma. Radiographics, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 667–694.
[26] Shrestha, S., Maharhan, S., Khanal, U., et al. (2017). Evaluation of image quality in cervical spine lateral radiographs. Journal of Chitwan Medical College, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 30–33.
[27] Tins, B. J. (2017). Imaging investigations in spine trauma: the value of commonly used imaging modalities and emerging imaging modalities. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 107–115.