Download fulltext HTML
Tahir, M. E., Alam Elhuda, D. M. E., & Elsadig Gasmalla, H. E. (2021). The Perception of Physiologists Toward Implementing Team-based Learning in Sudan: A national-scale Cross-sectional Study. Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences (SJMS), 16(1), 101-110. https://doi.org/10.18502/sjms.v16i1.8941

https://doi.org/10.18502/sjms.v16i1.8941

statistics

  • 960 Abstract Views
  • 318 PDF Views
  • 0 HTML Views

authors

  • Mohamed Elnajid Tahir

    Mohamed Elnajid Tahir

    Department of Physiology, Sudan International University, Khartoum, Sudan
  • Daffalla Mohammed Elamean Alam Elhuda

    Daffalla Mohammed Elamean Alam Elhuda

    Department of Community Medicine, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan
  • Hosam Eldeen Elsadig Gasmalla

    Hosam Eldeen Elsadig Gasmalla

    Dean, Deanship of Quality and Research, Sudan International University, Khartoum, Sudan

Published Date

  • Mar 31, 2021

The Perception of Physiologists Toward Implementing Team-based Learning in Sudan: A national-scale Cross-sectional Study

Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences (SJMS) / Sudan JMS: Volume 16 (2021), Issue No. 1 / Pages 101-110

Abstract

Background: Team-based Learning (TBL) is a teaching approach that fosters active learning and promotes the application of knowledge; its implementation remains sporadic and on a volunteering basis in Sudan. The aim of this study was to investigate the perception of Sudanese physiologist concerning the implementation of TBL.


Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study included all physiologists in Sudan during 2018. Data were collected using qualitative and quantitative methods, namely, questionnaire and nominal group technique (NGT), respectively.


Results: This study was the first national-scale study on TBL in Sudan, the study adds to the evidence of the benefits of TBL: improving the engagement of students, enhancing deep learning, and providing better instructor–student interaction. Furthermore, TBL was perceived to be of good use in tutorials. However, although TBL is perceived well by instructors, its implementation revealed two main challenges: first, the attendance of the students (and therefore their engagement) is a place of concern mostly because TBL is not well-allocated in the curricula of most medical schools and second, the substantial effort of preparation of TBL material and sessions will put a burden on the staff, rendering them less enthusiastic.


Conclusion: Fostering TBL requires administrative support and training to the staff, as well as proper incorporation of TBL in the curriculum.


Keywords: education, team-based learning, deep learning, physiology

References
1. Hrynchak P, Batty H. The educational theory basis of team-based learning. Med Teach. 2012;34(10):796-801.
2. Thompson BM, Schneider VF, Haidet P, Levine RE, McMahon KK, Perkowski LC, et al. Team-based learning at ten medical schools: two years later. Med Educ. 2007;41(3):250-7.
3. Johnson DW J, R. T. Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning Boston: Allyn & Bacon;. 1999.
4. Shankar N, Roopa R. Evaluation of a modified team based learning method for teaching general embryology to 1st year medical graduate students. Indian J Med Sci. 2009;63(1):4-12.
5. Parmelee D, Michaelsen LK, Cook S, Hudes PD. Team-based learning: a practical guide: AMEE guide no. 65. Med Teach. 2012;34(5):e275-87.
6. Levine RE, O'Boyle M, Haidet P, Lynn DJ, Stone MM, Wolf DV, et al. Transforming a clinical clerkship with team learning. Teach Learn Med. 2004;16(3):270-5.
7. Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International journal of medical education. 2011;2:53.
8. Chhabra N, Kukreja S, Chhabra S, Chhabra S, Khodabux S, Sabane H. Team-based Learning Strategy in Biochemistry: Perceptions and Attitudes of Faculty and 1(st)-Year Medical Students. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2017;7(Suppl 1):S72-S7.
9. Parmelee DX, Michaelsen LK. Twelve tips for doing effective Team-Based Learning (TBL). Med Teach. 2010;32(2):118-22.
10. Vasan NS, DeFouw DO, Holland BK. Modified use of team-based learning for effective delivery of medical gross anatomy and embryology. Anat Sci Educ. 2008;1(1):3-9.
11. Srivastava TK, Waghmare LS, Jagzape A, Mishra V. Interactive intragroup tutorials: a need-based modification to enhance learning in physiology. Adv Physiol Educ. 2015;39(4):414-5.
12. Koles PG, Stolfi A, Borges NJ, Nelson S, Parmelee DX. The impact of team-based learning on medical students' academic performance. Acad Med. 2010;85(11):1739-45.
13. Parmelee D, Michaelsen LK, Cook S, Hudes PD. Team-based learning: a practical guide: AMEE guide no. 65. Medical teacher. 2012;34(5):e275-e87.
14. Sibley J, Parmelee DX. Knowledge is no longer enough: Enhancing professional education with team-based learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning. 2008;2008(116):41-53.
15. Punja D, Kalludi SN, Pai KM, Rao RK, Dhar M. Team-based learning as a teaching strategy for first-year medical students. Australas Med J. 2014;7(12):490-9.
16. McInerney M F, L. D. . Team-based learning enhances long-term retention and critical
thinking in an undergraduate Microbial Physiology course. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education 2003;4:3-12.
17. Persky AM, Pollack GM. A modified team-based learning physiology course. Am J Pharm Educ. 2011;75(10):204.
18. Amalladinna AV, Pujari DK, Patil SS. A Comparative Study of Team-Based Learning on the Traditional Method of Conducting Tutorials in Physiology for First Year Mbbs Students. Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare. 2017;4(38):2291-4.
19. Gullo C, Ha TC, Cook S. Twelve tips for facilitating team-based learning. Med Teach. 2015;37(9):819-24.