Socio-Culture-Based Classroom Activities in Asia: Do They Work Effectively?
Abstract
Many studies on Second Language Acquisition are carried out based on the sociocultural theory (SCT) to explore learners’ potentials in learning a language. SCT which claims that learning language occurs when learners have the experience to use the language in interaction has been widely used as the basis of the teaching and learning in schools and higher education in Asia. More student-centered and collaborative activities with pair and group works are applied to increase students’ participation and promote language learning within students’ Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD). Within this framework, learners try to expand their ZPD through the assistance from their peers and teacher as the scaffolding of the learning development. However, studies show that implementing the socio-culture-based classroom activities are not trouble-free regarding challenges faced by both sides of the students and the teachers. Consequently, it is essential to have an understanding of how the activities can best work to achieve meaningful learning which promotes the maximum development of students’ actual and potential levels of learning. This paper presents a review of some research on socio-cultural-based education in the context of Asia and describes the findings, benefits and challenges to see how effective the activities are.
Keywords: socio cultural theory, classroom activities, benefits, challenges
References
[1] M. S. Aminloo, “The Effect of Collaborative Writing on EFL Learners Writing Ability at Elementary Level,” Journal of Language Teaching and Research, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 801–806, 2013.
[2] S. Behroozizad, R. M. K. Nambiar, and Z. Amir, “Sociocultural theory as an approach to aid EFL learners,” The Reading Matrix, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 217–226, 2014.
[3] R. M. Chisholm, “Coping with the problems of collaborative writing,” Writing Across the Curriculum Journal, pp. 90–108, 1990.
[4] I. Elola and A. Oskoz, “Collaborative writing: Fostering foreign language and writing conventions development,” Language Learning and Technology, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 51–71, 2010.
[5] E. L. Inglehart, K. D. Narko, and S. C. Zimmerman, “From cooperative learning to collaborative writing in the legal writing classroom,” The Journal of the Legal Writing Institute, pp. 185–226, 2003.
[6] G. Kessler, D. Bikowski, and J. Boggs, “Collaborative writing among second language learners in academic web-based projects,” Language Learning and Technology, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 91–109, 2012.
[7] J. P. Lantolf, “Sociocultural theory and L2: State of the art,” Studies in Second Language Acquisition, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 67–109, 2006.
[8] S. Puntambekar and R. Hübscher, “Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: What have we gained and what have we missed?” Educational Psychologist, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2005.
[9] Putnam Whitney, “A sociocultural approach to ESL for adult learners. All Graduate Plan B and other Reports,” Tech. Rep., A sociocultural approach to ESL for adult learners. All Graduate Plan B and other Reports. 1 Paper 2, 1-140, 2011.
[10] A. Rahaman, (2014). Reading comprehension through group work activities in an EFL classroom: An action research report. Working Papers on Culture, Education, and Human Development. 10(2).
[11] A. R. Sadeghi, “ESP Methodology: A transition from the present state,” in Proceedings of the First National ESP/EAP Conference, G. R Kiany and M. Khayyamdar, Eds., vol. 2, pp. 21–33, Tehran: SAMT, 2005.
[12] R. G. Samar and M. Dehqan, “Sociocultural theory and reading comprehension: The scaffolding of readers in an EFL context,” in International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, vol. 2, pp. 67–80, 2013.
[13] O. Suwantarathip and S. Wichadee, “The impacts of cooperative learning on anxiety and proficiency in an EFL Class,” Journal of College Teaching and Learning, vol. 7, no. 1, 2010.
[14] N. Storch, “Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections,” Journal of Second Language Writing, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 153–173, 2005.
[15] O. Tabatabaei, M. Afzali, and M. Mehrabi, “The effect of collaborative work on improving speaking ability and decreasing stress of Iranian EFL learners,” Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 274–280, 2015.
[16] Z. Vaezi, “Language learning motivation among Iranian undergraduate students,” World Applied Sciences Journal, pp. 51–54, 2008.
[17] L. S. Vygotsky, Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1978.
[18] J. W. Wertsch, D. Aaronson, and R. W. Rieber, (1981). The Genesis of Higher Mental Functions. Pp. 144, “188 in The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology, ed. J. V. Wertsch. Armonk, New York: M. E. Sharpe.
[19] G. Wells, Dialogic Inquiry, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999.
[20] Y-F. Yang and W.-T. Meng, “The effect of online feedback training on students’ text revision.,” Language Learning and Technology, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 220–238, 2013.
[21] J. Zuengler and E. R. Miller, “Cognitive and sociocultural perspectives: Two parallel SLA worlds?” TESOL Quarterly, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 35–58, 2006.