The Impact of Motivation on Proactive Behavior in the Perspective of Self-Determination Theory

Abstract

Using the Self-Determination Theory, the authors investigate the consequence of motivation. Specifically, this study analyzes the impacts of amotivation, extrinsic motivation, and intrinsic motivation toward proactive behavior of headquarter employees. Answering research problems and examining hypotheses, the authors applied regression technic to analysis eighty three data collected in the state organization which cover the Divisions under Directors of Finance and Human Resources and Sales Division outside of Finance & Human Resources Directors. The results of this research show that amotivation, extrinsic motivation, intrinsic motivation significantly and directly affect headquarter employee’s proactive behavior. These findings imply that company should give attention to the emergence of amotivation because amotivation can reduce or eliminate an employee’s proactive behavior in work which can ultimately disrupt the company’s performance. Moreover, the authors conclude by presenting theoretical and managerial implication.

References
[1] Bindl,U.,&Parker,S.K.(2011).ProactiveWorkBehavior:ForwardThinkingandChange-OrientedAction in Organizations. APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2, 567-598.

[2] Broeck, A. V., Schreurs, B., Witte, H. D., Vansteenkiste, M., Germeys, F., & Schaufeli, W. (2011). Understanding Workaholics’ Motivations: A SelfDetermination Perspective. Applied Psychology(4), 600-621.

[3] Broeck,V.d.,Vansteenkiste,M.,&H,D.W.(2008).Self-determinationtheory:Atheoreticalandempirical overview in occupational health psychology (Vol. 3). Nottingham: Nottingham University Presss.

[4] Broussard, S. C., & Garrison, M. E. (2004). The relationship Between Classroom Motivation and AcademicAchievementinElementarySchool-AgedChildren.FamilyandConsumerSciencesResearch Journal, 33, 106-120.

[5] Brummelhuis,L.L.,&Trougakos,J.P.(2014).TheRecoveryPotentialofIntrinsicallyVersusExtrinsically Motivated Off-job Activities. Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87, 177-199.

[6] Burhan, N. (2012). Penilaian Pembelajaran Bahasa. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

[7] Crabtree, S. (2013, october). Worldwide, 13% of Employees Are Engaged at Work. Retrieved february 28, 2018, from news.gallup.com:

[8] http://news.gallup.com/poll/165269/worldwide-employees-engagedwork.aspx.

[9] Crant,J.M.(2000).ProactiveBehaviorinOrganizations.Management,26,435462.Dan,S.C.,Sophia, V.M.,&Lim,A.S.(2007).HelpingandProactiveExtra-RoleBehaviors:TheInfluenceofMotives,Goals Orientations, and Social Context. Elsevier, 43, 2282–2293.

[10] Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Self Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development and Well-Being. American psychologist, 55, 68-68.

[11] Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and The Self-Determination of Behaviour. Pyschological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.

[12] Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of Self-Determination Research. Rochester: University of Rochester Press.

[13] Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains. Canadian Psychology, 49, 14-23.

[14] Dessler, G. (2014). Fundamentals of Human Resource Management (3 ed.). Harlow, America: Pearson.

[15] Gagne, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self determination Theory and Work Motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331-362.

[16] Gagne, M., Forest, J., Vasnteenkiste, M., Crevier, B. L., Broeck, A. V., Aspeli, A. K., et al. (2015). The MultidimensionalWorkMotivationScale:ValidationEvidenceinSevenLanguagesandNineCountries. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24, 178-196.

[17] Griffin,M.N.,&Parker,S.(2007).ANewModelofWorkRolePerformance:PositiveBehaviorinUncertain and Interdependent Context. The Academy of Management Journal, 50, 327-247.

[18] Guay,F.C.,Ratelle,C.F.,Marsh,H.W.,Laroes,S.,&Boivin,M.(2010).IntrinsicIdentified,andControlled Types of Motivation for School Subjects in Young Elementary Shcool Children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 711-735.

[19] Heckhausen, H. (1991). Motivation and Action. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

[20] Husein,U.(2011).MetodePenelitianUntukSkripsidanTesisBisnis.Jakarta:PTRajaGrafindoPersada.

[21] Jones, J. P. (2010). Happiness at Work Maximizing your Psychological Capital For Succes. Chicester: Willey Blackwell.


[22] Parker,S.K.,Blindl,U.K.,&Strauss,K.(2010).MakingThingsHappen:AmodelofProactiveMotivation. Journal of Management, 36, 827-856.

[23] Perusahaan Perdagangan Indonesia. (n.d.). Retrieved March 2, 2018, from Perusahaan Perdagangan Indonesia: http://bumn.go.id/ppi/application#

[24] Robinson,S.L.,&Bennett,R.J.(1995).ATypologyofDeviantWorkplaceBehaviors:AMultidimensional Scaling Study. Academy of Management, 38, 555-572.

[25] Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67.

[26] Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation,Ssocial Development, and Well-Being. Amerin Psychological Association, 55, 68-78.

[27] Ryan,R.M.,Mims,V.,&Koestner,R.(1983).RelationofRewardContingencyandInterpersonalContext toIntrinsicMotivation;AreviewandTestUsingCognitiveEvaluationTheory.JournalofPersonalityand Social Psychology, 45, 736-750.

[28] Schnake, M. (1991). Organizational Citizenship: A review, Proposed Model, and Research Agenda. Human Relations, 44, 735-759.

[29] Strauss, K., Parker, S. K., & O’Shea, D. (2017). When Does Proactivity Have a Cost? Motivation at Work Moderates the Effects of Proactive Work Behavior on Employee Job Strain. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 100, 15-26.

[30] Vandercammen, L., Hofmans, J., & Peter, T. (2014). The Mediating Role Of Affect in The Relationship BetweenNeedSatisfcationandAutonomousMotivation.OccupationalandOrganizationalPsychology, 87, 62-79.

[31] Wittmer, D. (1991). Serving the People or Serving for Pay: Reward Preferences Among Government, Hybrid Sector, and Business Managers. Public Productivity & Management Review, 369-283.