Download fulltext HTML
Hastuti, E., Medawati, I., & Anggraini, F. (2019). The Ecosystem Approach for Improved Sanitation in Specific Urban Areas. KnE Social Sciences, 3(21), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i21.4971

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i21.4971

statistics

  • 335 Abstract Views
  • 211 PDF Views
  • 0 HTML Views

authors

  • Elis Hastuti

    Elis Hastuti

    Research Institute for Housing and Human Settlements Agency for Research and Development, Ministry of Public Works and Housing, Indonesia
  • Ida Medawati

    Ida Medawati

    Research Institute for Housing and Human Settlements Agency for Research and Development, Ministry of Public Works and Housing, Indonesia
  • Fitrijani Anggraini

    Fitrijani Anggraini

    Research Institute for Housing and Human Settlements Agency for Research and Development, Ministry of Public Works and Housing, Indonesia

Published Date

  • Aug 5, 2019

The Ecosystem Approach for Improved Sanitation in Specific Urban Areas

KnE Social Sciences / Equity, Equality, and Justice in Urban Housing Development (ISTEcS 2018) / Pages 231–242

Abstract

The acceleration of improved sanitation access in specific urban areas can reduce water-borne diseases and the degradation of water resources. In this paper, the development of technology of wastewater infrastructure in some specific urban regions with an ecosystem approach will be analyzed based on some practical research. The ecosystem approach is analyzed with integrated biophysical and social factors for improved wastewater system; it includes the tidal area, coastal area, and urban water sensitive area. The system of wastewater treatment has certain design criteria to be adapted for specific areas and upgrading the treatment process based on the ecosystem characteristic, community awareness of sanitation and some best practices. The design criteria of wastewater treatment consider the process of environment approach, pollutant transformation target, and the configuration of the processing unit. The option of treatment technology at an individual, communal or settlement scale depends on biophysical factors in each area. This condition can achieve 80-95 % organic removal, 30-70 % nutrient removal by biofilm absorption or phytofiltration. Challenges and social constraints at each selected technology development have an influence on the sustainability of infrastructure in achieving health requirements and the standard of effluent for watercourse or water reuse.


 


 


Keywords: specific area, ecosystem, wastewater, technology

References
[1] Kostas Voudouris and Dimitra Voutsa (2012). Ecological Water Quality – Water Treatment and Reuse.In situ Remediation Technologies Associated with Sanitation Improvement: An Opportunity for Water Quality Recovering in Developing Countries. Croatia: Intech.


[2] Lulu’ul Badriyah, Ahmad Syafiq.(2017). The Association between Sanitation, Hygiene, and Stunting in Children Under Two-Years (An Analysis of Indonesia’s Basic Health Research, 2013). Makara J. Health Res., 21(2): 35-41.


[3] Lilik Setyowatiningsih, Surati. (2017). Hubungan Higiene Sanitasi Dengan Kejadian Infeksi Soil Transmistted Helminths pada Pemulung di TPS Jatibatang. Jurnal Riset Kesehatan, 6(1), 40-44. http://ejournal.poltekkes-smg.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jrk.


[4] Prayatni.(2015).Teknologi Pengolahan Limbah Cair Domestik dan Kajian Aspek Non Teknis. Seminar International Indonesia dan Jepang, 27-28 Agustus, Yogjakarta 2015.


[5] Enrico Rahadi Djonoputro, Isabel Blackett, Jan-Willem Rosenboom and Almud Weitz. (2010). Understanding sanitation options in challenging environments, Waterlines, 29, 3.


[6] Graham, P., Jay, and Polizzotto, L., Matthew. (2013). Pit Latrines and Their Impacts on Groundwater Quality: A Systematic Review. Environmental Health Perspectives, 121, 5.


[7] Tri Hesti Mulyani, Etty Endang, Listiati B., Tyas Susanti, Djoko Suwarno. (2017). Evaluation of Home Sanitation System in Tidal Areas, A Case Study of Kemijen Village, Semarang, Indonesia. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 7, 11.


[8] Alcamo, Joseph. (2003). Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Framework for Assessment. Island Press: Washington.


[9] Arianto A. Patunru. (2015). Access to Safe Drinking Water and Sanitation in Indonesia. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies. https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.81.


[10] Suwartanti Nayono, Helmut Lehn, Jürgen Kopfmüller and Jörg London. (2011). Sustainable Sanitation as a Part of an IWRM in the Karst Area of Gunung Kidul: Community Acceptance and Opinion. Water Practice & Technology, 5, 4:1-18.


[11] A R Lawrence, D M J Macdonald, A G Howard, M H Barrett, S Pedley, K M Ahmed, M Nalubega. (2001). Guidelines for Assessing the Risk to Groundwater from On-Site Sanitation. British Geological Survey: London.


[12] Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Perumahan dan Permukiman (Pusperkim). Kementerian PUPR (2016). Laporan Akhir Penelitian Penerapan Teknologi Air Minum dan Air Limbah di Kawasan Daerah Aliran Sungai. Bandung.


[13] D. G. Rao,R. Senthilkumar, J. Anthony Byrne, S. Feroz. (2013). Advanced Processes and Technologies, Taylor & Francis Group.


[14] Sabam Oraendo Ajakima dan Eddy S. Soedjono. (2016). Perencanaan Instalasi Pengolahan Air Limbah Komunal Di Kelurahan Kedung Cowek Sebagai Upaya Revitalisasi Kawasan Pesisir Surabaya. JURNAL TEKNIK ITS, 5: 2.


[15] Wang, J., Chu, L.(2016). Biological Nitrate Removal from Water and Wastewater by Solid-Phase Denitrification Process. Biotechnol Adv, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. biotechadv.2016.07.001.


[16] Loïc Daudey. (2018). The cost of urban sanitation solutions: a literature review . Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development, 8, 2: 176-195.


[17] Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Perumahan dan Permukiman (Pusperkim). Kementerian PUPR (2017). Laporan Akhir Penelitian Penerapan Pengolahan Air limbah di Kawasan Pasang Surut. Bandung.


[18] Banu, Rajesh,J., Kaliappan, Sudalyandi and Beck Dieter. (2006). Treatment of Sago Wastewater using Hybrid Anaerobic Reactor. Water Qual Res., J. Canada, 41, 1, 56-6.