Factors Influencing Teacher Professionalism Development on Secondary School
Abstract
Development is a permanent issue in school worldwide which teacher demand in enhance their competence, especially in professionalism competence. The main purpose of this article is to investigate whether three factors were influence teacher professionalism development, those are (1) leadership of principal, (2) organizational commitment, (3) school culture. This research is survey research. The population was
182 teachers of Muhammadiyah Secondary School of Yogyakarta. A sample of 162 teachers was established using the simple random sampling technique. The data were collected through questionnaire that had been tested for validity and reliability. The data analysis technique used double regression. The research finding shows that there was a positive and significant effect of: (1) leadership of principal on teacher
professionalism development, as much 15,7%, (2) organizational commitment on teacher professionalism development, as much 15,7%, (3) school culture on teacher professionalism development, as much 21,1%.
Keywords: Professionalism Development, Effective Leadership, Organizational Commitment, School Culture.
References
[1] Joyce & Shower. “Improving Inserving Training: The Messages of Reaseach,” The Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, (1980).
[2] Kholid N.M. & Masduki. “Pengembangan Kemampuan Penelitian dan Penulisan Karya Ilmiah Bagi Guru Matematika Sma/Smk Muhammadiyah Di Klaten dan Sukoharjo,” 2549-5631, (2017).
[3] Guskey, T.R. “Professional Development and Teacher Change,” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8 (3/4), 381-389, (2002).
[4] Darling, H. L., Maria E. H., & Madelyn G. “Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto,” CA: Learning Policy Institute, (2017).
[5] Gebreselassie M. “Principals’ Roles in Fostering Teachers’ Continuous Professional Development in Government Secondary Schools of Addis Ababa,” Ethiopia, (2015).
[6] Gumus, S. and Kemal, M. “The Effects of Teacher and School-Level Factors on Teachers’ Participation in Professional Development Activities: The role of principal leadership”, Journal of International Education Research, Fourth Quarter 9(4), (2013).
[7] Holland, P. E. “The Principal’s Role in Teacher Development”, Srate Journal, 17(1), (2009).
[8] Combee, S. The Relationship Between Administrative and Teacher Efficacy in The Professional Life of Special Education Teachers”, Theses and Dissertation from Virginia Commonwealt University, (2014).
[9] Emmanouil, K, Anasstasiou O., & Loukeri P. I. “The Impact of Leadership on Teachers’ Effectiveness”, Internasional Journal of Humanities and Social Science. Vol. 4, No. 7(1), (2014).
[10] Kose. B. W. “The Principals Role in Professional Development for Socal Justice”, Articles Urban Education. 44 (6), (2009).
[11] Mahdy, N. H. “The Impact of Leadership Style on Teachers’ Professional Development”, Dissertation Supervision. Dubai, (2016).
[12] Priansa. D.J. “Menjadi Kepala Sekolah dan Guru Professional”, Bandung: Pustaka Setia, (2017).
[13] Riley R., W., Marshall S., & Pascal D., F.”Teacher Professionalization and Teacher Commitment: A Multilevel Analysis”, National center for Education Statistic. NCES 97-069, (1997)
[14] Noordin, F., Rashid, R. M., Ghani, R., Rasimah A., & Darus, Z. “Teacher Professionalisation and Organisational Commitment: Evidence from Malaysia”, International Business & Economics Research Journal, 9(2), 49-52, (2010).
[15] Ibrahim, M. “Teachers’ Perceptions of Professional Commitment (Affective, Continuance and Normative Commitment) to Teaching Profession”. European Journal of Business and Management. 7 (1), 2222-1905, (2015).
[16] Mannan, F. “The Relationship Between Women Principal Instructional Leadership Practices, Teacher Organizational Commitment and Teacher Professional Community Practice in Secondary Schools in Kuala Lumpur”, Thesis. Institute of educational leadership University of Malaya Kuala lumpur, (2017).
[17] Peterson, K. and Deal T. (2002). “How Leaders Influence the Culture of Schools. Educational Leadership”, 56 (1), 2830.