HTML Download fulltext
Pattiselanno, F., Koibur, J. F., & Yohanes, C. H. (2016). Traditional Ecological Knowledge (Tek) In Hunting: From Culture To Nature. KnE Social Sciences, 1(1), 66-70. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v1i1.436

https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v1i1.436

statistics

  • 1286 Abstract Views
  • 0 HTML Views
  • 171 PDF Views

authors

  • Freddy Pattiselanno
    No author data available.
  • Johan F. Koibur
    No author data available.
  • C. Hieronymus Yohanes
    No author data available.

Published Date

  • Aug 24, 2016

Traditional Ecological Knowledge (Tek) In Hunting: From Culture To Nature

KnE Social Sciences / International Conference on Social Science and Biodiversity of Papua and Papua New Guinea (ICSBP 2015) / Pages 66-70

Abstract

In Papua, the practices of Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) in hunting were: limiting hunting on particular species, performing hunting using traditional hunting techniques, protecting specific land tenure from hunting and hunting on particular period of time.  These practices were highly complex and highly variable across Papua – a set of unwritten and cultural law that passed on verbally from one generation to another that played important roles on nature protection.


Keywords: Traditional ecological knowledge, hunting, culture, nature

References
[1] F. Berkes, J. Colding, and C. Folke, Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management, Ecol Appl, 10, 1251–1262, (2000).


[2] J. Colding and C. Folke, Social taboos: “Invisible” systems of local resource management and biological conservation, Ecol Appl, 11, 584–600, (2001).


[3] J. A. Drew, Use of traditional ecological knowledge in marine conservation, Conserv Biol, 19, 1286–1293, (2005).


[4] M. Jemison, Feathers of seduction – the connection between birds and people of New Guinea, http://smithsonianscience.org/2015/01/ feathers-seduction-connection-birds-people-new-guinea/, 2015, [accessed 24 April 2015].


[5] M. D. Madhusudan and K. U. Karanth, Local hunting and the conservation of large mammals in India, Ambio, 3(1), 49–54, (2002).


[6] E. J. Milner-Gulland and E. L. Bennett, Wild meat: the bigger picture, Trends Ecol Evol, 18, 351–357, (2003).


[7] Y. Ntiamoa-Baidu, in Wildlife and food security in Africa, FAO Conservation Guide 33, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 1997.


[8] New Guinea Vegetation, K. Paijmans, Ed., The Australian National University Press, Canberra, 1976.


[9] M. Rao, T. Myint, T. Zaw, and S. Htun, Hunting patterns in tropical forests adjoining the Hkakaborazi National Park, North Myanmar, Oryx, 39, 292–300, (2005).


[10] J. G. Robinson and E. L. Bennett, Having your wildlife and eating it too: an analysis of hunting sustainability across tropical ecosystems, Anim Conserv, 7, 397–408, (2004).


[11] P. Sillitoe, Always been farmer-foragers? Hunting and gathering in the Papua New Guinea Highlands, Anthropol Forum, 12, 45–76, (2002).


[12] A. I. Sumule, The technology adoption behavior of the Indigenous People of Irian Jaya: A case study, Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Cenderawasih, Manokwari, 1995.


[13] F. Wanggai and M. S. E. Kilmaskossu, Community participation in conservation activities at the Marine National Park Cenderawasih Bay, Paper on Coordination Meeting for the development of Taman Nasional Laut Teluk Cenderawasih, Manokwari, 30 September 1995 (1995).