The Effect of Learning Strategies on Mathematics Learning Outcomes at Bekasi State Vocational High School 7
Abstract
This study aims to determine whether there are differences in mathematics learning outcomes between students who are taught using inquiry learning strategies and expository learning strategies at Bekasi State Vocational High School 7. This is an experimental research with research design using Pretest–Posttest Control Group Design. The population in this study were all students in the Audio Video Engineering Department. Sampling was done through simple random sampling technique, and the students of class XI TAV 1 obtained were the experimental class given treatment with inquiry learning strategies and students of class XI TAV 2 were the control classes treated with expository learning strategies. The instrument used in this study was posttest to measure mathematics learning outcomes. Data analysis consisted of normality test using Lilliefors test and homogeneity test using Fisher’s test. The results of the calculation of the normality test in the class using inquiry learning strategies amounted to 1.154 and the class using the expository learning strategy of 1.116 with L
References
[1] Muhammad Fathurrohman. (2015). 2013 Curriculum Learning Paradigm. Yogyakarta: Kalimedia. p. 108.
[2] Walter Dick, Lou Carey. (2006). The Systematic Design of Instruction 6th Edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Pearson. p. 171.
[3] Robert Maribe Branch. (2009). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. New York: Springer. p. 85.
[4] J. Michael Spector et al. (2014). Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. New York: Springer. p. 960.
[5] Kenneth D. Moore. (2005). Effective Instructional Strategies From Theory to Practice. California: Sage Publications, Inc. p. 227.
[6] Richard I. Arends. (2015). Learning To Teach. New York: McGraw Hill. p. 313.
[7] Bruce Joyce et al. (2009). Models of Teaching. New York: Pearson Education. pp. 375-376.
[8] David H. Jonassen. (2013). Learning, Problem Solving, and Mindtools. New York: Routledge. p. 299.
[9] Paul Eggen and Don Kauchak. (2007) Educational Psychology. Ohio: Merril Pearson. p. 423.
[10] Emzir,. (2008). Quantitative and Qualitative Education Research Methodology. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.