KnE Life Sciences | The Fourth International Scientific Conference Ecology and Geography of Plants and Plant Communities | pages: 211–218

, , and

1. Introduction

A common trend in the Ural Mountains and other regions was a considerable expansion of woody and shrub vegetation into mountain tundra communities in the 20 th and the beginning of the 21 st centuries [1,2]. However, areas covered by mountain tundra communities are quite small in the Northern and Southern Urals [3]. This expansion of woody and shrub vegetation may have grave consequences. Thus, studies into woody plants on the upper limits of mountainous terrain are already numerous, but research into shrub vegetation dynamics is not comprehensive [4,5]. The invasion of deciduous trees and shrubs leads to changes in tundra communities [6–8]. Microclimatic conditions change under the shrub cover. The shrub layer keeps the snow cover longer, decreases the influence of wind and shades the ground surface: as a result, air and soil humidity increase [8,9].

Juniperus sibirica Burgsd. shrubs form the upper limit of woody vegetation on the western slope of the Ural Mountains. The biotic effects of J. sibirica have not been studied before. We suggest that the invasion of J. sibirica into mountain tundra communities may be the cause of changes in the abundance of vascular plant and lichens. It may also change the ecological structure of tundra communities, possibly by causing an increase in the abundance of mesophytes.

The aim of our investigation is to evaluate the abundance and structural features of the living ground cover (herb-dwarf-shrub and moss-lichen layers) in mountain tundra communities with different degree of J. sibirica cover in the Northern and Southern Urals.

2. Methods

Area

Mountain tundra communities of the Northern (the Kvarkush ridge) and Southern (the Zigalga and Nurgush ridges) Urals were researched. The characteristics of the Kvarkush ridge: flat top of mountain in the upper reaches of the Zhigalan -2 (N 60 08'; E 58 44'); 880–933 m above sea level; rock percentage cover 1–40%; lichen-moss-herb tundra. The characteristics of the Nurgush ridge: mountain Northern (Big) Nurgush (N 54 48'; E 59 08'); 1300–1336 m above sea level; southern-eastern slope 3–5 ; rock percentage cover 1–20%; moss-herb tundra. The characteristics of the Zigalga ridge: mountain Poperechnaya (N 54 39'; E 58 39'); 1257–1293 m above sea level; southern-eastern slope 3 ; rock percentage cover 2–25%; lichen-herb tundra.

Study plots and relevés

Study plots were chosen with different degree of J. sibirica cover. There were three groups of J. sibirica abundance from lack of cover to dominance: 0% (sign J. sibirica 0); 30–40% (J. sibirica +) and 80–95% (J. sibirica ++). Study plots were chosen at random. The plots did not have common boundaries. Study plots were 100 square meters. We used 3–8 special plots (0.625 square meters) for moss-lichen synusie characteristics [10].

We estimated the number of vascular plant and lichen species on each study plot (species density) and the percentage cover of the herb-dwarf-shrub layer (vascular plants), mosses and lichens. Vascular plant and lichen species abundance was evaluated via the Drude scale. We estimated rock percentage cover on each study plot. We conducted fieldwork during June and July in 2016 and 2017: the Kvarkush ridge – the first 10-day period in July 2017; the Nurgush ridge – the last 10-day period in June 2017; and the Zigalga ridge – the last 10-day period in June 2016. The number of relevés were: the Zigalga ridge – 18 plots and 47 special plots; the Nurgush ridge – 12 and 47; the Kvarkush ridge – 15 and 79.

Data analysis

We analyzed the following data: (i) the common abundance of each layer and species richness (species density – number of vascular plants, mosses and lichens on each plot); (ii) the abundance of different functional and ecological groups.

The functional groups of vascular plants were: (i) forbs; (ii) grasses; and (iii) others (Diphasiastrum, Dryopteris, Empetrum, Rubus, Vaccinium species). The ecological groups of vascular plants were: (i) psychrophyte; (ii) mesophyte; and (iii) hygrophyte. The lichen morphological groups were: (i) shrub-fruticose (Cladonia sp.); (ii) tubulose (Cladonia sp.); (iii) cup-shaped (Cladonia sp.); (iv) foliose (Peltigera sp.); and (v) others (Cetraria sp.; Cladonia sp.; Flavocetraria sp.).

The Drude data abundance of each plant and lichen species was converted into a percentage: 0 – 0%; un – 0.1%; un-sol – 0.4%; sol-un – 0.7%; sol – 1%; sol-sp – 3%; sp-sol – 5%; sp – 7%; sp-cop 1 – 11%; sp-cop 1-2 – 15%; cop 1 – 20%; cop 1-2 – 27%; cop 1-3 – 35%; cop 2 – 40%; cop 3 – 65%; soc – 90%. Afterward, we counted total percentage cover of vascular plants and lichens and also the cover portion of different groups of vascular plants and lichens in the total cover.

We used general linear models (GLM) for statistical analysis. We used a scheme with discrete and continuous predictors, factor interaction and hierarchically nested effects. The discrete factors were: (i) J. sibirica percentage cover (J. sibirica 0; J. sibirica + and J. sibirica ++); (ii) area (the Northern or Southern Urals); (iii) `mountain' (Kvarkush, Nurgush, Poperechnaya) was a nested predictor within area; and (iv) J. sibirica – area interaction. The continuous factors were: (v) altitude above sea level; (vi) rock percentage cover. We state the mean ± standard error. We used STATISTICA 10.0 for analysis.

3. Results

We detected 23 vascular plant and 43 lichen species in the Northern Urals (the Kvarkush ridge). There were 30 vascular plant and 33 lichen species on the Nurgush ridge, and 38 and 23 species, respectively, on Poperechnaya Mountain in the Southern Urals. So γ-biodiversity of vascular plants is higher in the Southern Urals then the Northern Urals. However, lichen γ-biodiversity is much higher in the Northern Urals. Vascular plant species density varies from 9 to 15 species per 100 square meters (Table 1). Lichen species density is 5–11 species per plot (Table 1). The range of vascular plant percentage cover is about 68–77% on plots with J. sibirica 0–40% cover. Plots with J. sibirica dominance are characterized by 20–34% vascular plant cover. The abundance of mosses and lichens decreases as one moves from the Northern to the Southern Urals.

The estimations of the main variability factors that lead to plant community structure change are presented in Table 2. The abundance of the herb-dwarf-shrub layer depends on J. sibirica percentage cover. Moss percentage cover is affected by J. sibirica abundance. The common tendency for moss cover is to decline on plots with J. sibirica dominance. However, an important feature is that the moss cover has a significantly different response to J. sibirica abundance in the tundra communities of the Northern and Southern Urals.

Lichen species abundance depends on abiotic (altitude above sea level and rock percentage cover) and geographical (area and mountain) conditions. All of these factors do not have any effect on the α- biodiversity (species density) of vascular plants and lichens. The ratios of different functional and ecological groups of vascular plants and morphological and ecological groups of lichens are independent of biotic, abiotic and geographical factors (we do not demonstrate these tundra community parameters in Table 2).

Table 1

Abundance and species richness of living ground cover in Ural mountain tundra communities with different percentage cover of Juniperus sibirica (m ± SE).


J. sibirica Percentage Cover Percentage Cover, % Species Number on 100 м 2
Vascular Plants Mosses Lichens Vascular Plants Lichens
The Northern Urals, Kvarkush ridge
J. sibirica 0 68.0 ± 7.3 70.0 ± 4.5 10.0 ± 1.6 10.2 ± 1.2 8.6 ± 1.5
J. sibirica + 56.0 ± 5.1 64.0 ± 6.0 12.0 ± 1.2 9.6 ± 0.8 9.4 ± 1.5
J. sibirica ++ 34.0 ± 2.4 40.0 ± 5.5 9.8 ± 1.8 8.8 ± 0.4 11.4 ± 1.3
The Southern Urals, Nurgush ridge
J. sibirica 0 67.5 ± 9.2 35.0 ± 11.9 3.0 ± 2.3 13.0 ± 1.1 5.3 ± 1.9
J. sibirica + 65.0 ± 2.9 38.8 ± 10.1 5.8 ± 4.8 15.0 ± 0.4 7.8 ± 0.8
J. sibirica ++ 23.8 ± 5.9 30.5 ± 10.4 2.8 ± 0.9 13.5 ± 1.2 8.3 ± 0.5
The Southern Urals, Poperechnaya mountain
J. sibirica 0 76.7 ± 2.1 1.3 ± 0.8 8.7 ± 3.4 12.5 ± 1.2 7.0 ± 2.4
J. sibirica + 71.7 ± 3.1 3.0 ± 1.6 7.8 ± 2.1 10.8 ± 1.1 6.2 ± 1.7
J. sibirica ++ 19.5 ± 9.0 5.5 ± 2.1 7.5 ± 2.1 11.5 ± 0.8 8.8 ± 1.9
Source: Authors' own work.

The upper shift of woody vegetation in different parts of the Ural Mountains is connected with J. sibirica invasion into tundra communities. This process leads to a decrease in vascular plant and moss abundance on plots with J. sibirica dominance. However, the reorganization of the internal structure of mountain tundra communities during J. sibirica invasion was not detected. We could not determine the relationship between the ratio of different groups of plants and lichens and J. sibirica percentage cover. We cannot demonstrate significant differences of plant and lichen α-biodiversity on plot with various degree of J. sibirica cover.

Thus, our hypothesis is partially true that J. sibirica invasion leads to a decrease in vascular plant abundance. However, the hypothesis that J. sibirica invasion is the cause of the overgrowth of mesophyte plants in tundra communities is partially wrong.

Our results about the lack of influence of J. sibirica on the structure of Ural mountain tundra communities agree with the conclusions of some other researchers. These results demonstrate that shrub invasion does not have any influence on the herb-dwarf-shrub layer [11,12]. However, in some cases the invasion of deciduous shrubs leads to an increase in the height and abundance of vascular plants and a decrease in total species biodiversity and moss and lichen abundance [6–8].

Table 2

Value F-test in GLM and significance (P) of variation sources of living ground cover abundance and species richness in tundra communities in the Ural Mountains.


Variation Sources Index Percentage Cover, % Species Number
Vascular Plants Mosses Lichens Vascular Plants Lichens
Juniperus sibirica percentage cover (dF = 2) [1] F 37.22 4.51 1.29 0.43 0.60
P < 0.0001 0.0179 0.2882 0.6509 0.5542
Area (dF = 1) [2] F 1.04 3.79 12.61 3.18 0.24
P 0.3150 0.0593 0.0011 0.0828 0.6271
Interaction [1] × [2] F 1.68 4.34 0.32 3.09 0.03
P 0.2012 0.0206 0.7300 0.0576 0.9730
Mountain # (dF = 1) F 0.18 9.02 15.37 5.41 0.09
P 0.6782 0.0048 0.0004 0.0257 0.7690
Altitude above sea level ## (dF = 1) F 0.99 1.86 11.36 1.43 0.14
P 0.3267 0.1806 0.0018 0.2402 0.7145
Rock percentage cover ## (dF = 1) F 1.86 0.96 6.04 1.17 1.13
P 0.1814 0.3346 0.0190 0.2862 0.2956
Source: Authors' own work.
Notes. # in GLM, the factor `Mountain' was hierarchically nested in the factor `Area'; ## in GLM, these factors were analyzed like covariates without an estimation of interaction.
Source: Authors' own work.

One of causes behind the weak reaction of mountain tundra communities to J. sibirica invasion may be their mosaic structure. Equally, different community components respond to environmental changes in different ways and at different rates. Generally, biotic ecosystem components respond to global changes more slowly than they do to abiotic components [11]. Also, the lack of plant community structure change on plots with various degree of J. sibirica cover may be caused by short-term invasion. The studied mountain tundra communities of the Northern and Southern Urals still retain their original features and characteristics. Significant differences in the moss and lichen percentage covers of the tundra communities on each mountain demonstrate the preservation of their typical features and characteristics [3].

4. Conclusion

Juniperus sibirica invasion into mountain tundra communities of the Northern and Southern Ural leads to a decrease in vascular plant and moss abundance on plots with J. sibirica dominance. However, distinct changes in plant community structures after the invasion of J. sibirica are not demonstrated.

Acknowledgement

The authors are grateful to the employees at the Museum of the Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology UD RAS (Herbarium, SVER) for identifying vascular plant species.

Funding

Field work was developed with the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (grant №№ 15-29-02449 and 16-05-00454) and data analysis was completed with the Russian Federal Government's financial support to the Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology UD RAS.

References

1 

Harsch, M. A., Hulme, P. E., McGlone, M. S., et al. (2009). Are treelines advancing? A global meta-analysis of treeline response to climate warming. Ecology Letters, vol. 12, pp. 1040–1049.

2 

Moiseev, P. A., Shiyatov, S. G., and Grigoriev, A. A. (2016). Climatogenic Dynamics of Woody Vegetation at the Upper Limit of Its Distribution on the Big Taganay Ridge during the Last Century. Ekaterinburg: UB RAS.

3 

Gorchakovskij, P. L. (1975). Vegetative World of the Ural High Mountains. Moscow: Nauka.

4 

Hallinger, M., Manttey, M., and Wilmking, M. (2010). Establishing a missing link: Warm summer and winter snow cover promote shrub expansion into alpine tundra in Scandinavia. New Phytology, vol. 186, no. 4, pp. 890–899.

5 

Myers-Smith, I. H., Forbes, B. C., Wilmking, M., et al. (2011). Shrub expansion in tundra ecosystems: Dynamics, impacts and research priorities. Environmental Research Letters, vol. 6, pp. 1–15.

6 

Walker, M. D., Wahren, C. H., Hollister, R. D., et al. (2006). Plant community responses to experimental warming across the tundra biome. PNAS, vol. 103, no. 5, pp. 1342–1346.

7 

Pajunen, A. M., Oksanen, J., and Virtanen, R. (2011). Impact of shrub canopies on understorey vegetation in Western Eurasian Tundra. Journal of Vegetation Science, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 837–846.

8 

Elmendorf, S. C., Henry, G. H. R., Hollister, R. D. et al. (2012). Plot-scale evidence of tundra vegetation change and links to recent summer warming. Nature Climate Change, vol. 2, pp. 453–457.

9 

Tsuyuzaki, S., Matsuda, M., and Akasaka, M. (2012). Effect of a deciduous shrub on microclimate along an elevation gradient, Mount Koma, Northern Japan. Climate Research, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 1–10.

10 

Magomedova, M. A. (2006). Restoration of lichen cover on fireplaces in pretundra forests of West Siberia. Scientific Bulletin, Biota of Yamal and Problems of Regional Ecology, vol. 1 no. 38, pp. 27–38.

11 

Tape, K. D., Sturm, M., and Racine, C. (2006). The evidence for shrub expansion in Northern Alaska and the Pan-Arctic. Global Change Biology, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 686–702.

12 

Kapfer, J., Virtanen, R., and Grytnes, J. A. (2012). Changes in Arctic vegetation on Jan Mayen Island over 19 and 80 Years. Journal of Vegetation Science, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 771–781.

FULL TEXT

Statistics

  • Downloads 0
  • Views 26

Navigation

Refbacks



ISSN: 2413-0877