KnE Life Sciences | The Fourth International Scientific Conference Ecology and Geography of Plants and Plant Communities | pages: 34–42

and

1. Introduction

Invasive species have morphological and functional traits allowing them to successfully invade new regions and communities; their analysis is important to better understand the general mechanisms of plant invasion and is thus of considerable applied relevance. Invasive plants have been shown to have a high growth rate, a high rate of physiological processes and a preferential allocation of biomass and nutrients to leaves and shoots [1]. However, the relative growth rate has not been estimated for many invasive species, including Acer negundo L. and Amelanchier spicata (Lam.) K. Koch. It was important for us to reveal the morphological traits associated with the suggested high growth rate. Such traits can be found in both above- and below-ground plant organs [2,3].

As far as below-ground organs are concerned, the strategic characteristics of plants are associated mainly with the root cortex [4], more specifically with the most metabolically active tissue such as cortex parenchyma [5]. Usually, thicker roots with a greater number of cortex parenchyma cell layers and higher tissue density require more energy and nutrients, grow slower and live longer [4,6]. In contrast, the roots of fast-growing species have a high specific root length (SRL) and a small number of cell layers; therefore, they are able to grow faster and intercept resources [7]. Invasive plants have been shown to have a high SRL as well [8], which means that their roots are energetically cheap to produce [4]. Although SRL strongly correlates with root diameter [9], it is usually calculated for all roots less than 1 mm in diameter which are functionally divergent: this does allow for an accurate comparison. The data on fine root diameter are limited; it has been shown to be the same [10,11], smaller [12] or greater [14,15] in invasive plants than in native species. Such a difference between studies could be due to the analysis of either taxonomically or ecologically distinct plant species.

The aim of the present study was to compare several morphological and anatomical traits between (i) functionally homogeneous absorbing roots with primary development and (ii) taxonomically close invasive and native species growing in the same conditions. This will reduce methodological, taxonomic and ecological effects.

2. Methods

Plant species

We selected two invasive species, box elder (Acer negundo L.) and low juneberry (Amelanchier spicata L.), shown to be invasive in Europe [16], Russia [17] and the Central Urals [18]. For comparison, two native species were studied: Norway maple (Acer platanoides L.) and rowan (Sorbus aucuparia L.). Both species are rather common in the Central Urals, where the samples were collected.

Study sites

The roots were collected in Ekaterinburg, a city in the south taiga zone with a temperate continental climate. To measure stable morphological and anatomical characteristics, two sites were chosen; an additional sampling from a third site was performed to analyse arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) colonization as a more variable feature. In all sites, invasive and native species grew together or in close proximity to each other.

Sampling and morphological analysis

Root fragments were sampled during June and July in 2015, from 5–15 cm deep for five plants of each species at each sampling site. Only the live roots of two–three distal orders were selected and fixed in 70% ethanol. For each plant, 5–10 intact apical roots were transversally cut into sections 15–20 µm in depth on a freezing microtome. The following parameters were then determined: root diameter, central cylinder diameter, the thickness of the cortex parenchyma, number of cortex parenchyma cell layers and parenchyma cell diameter. Only parenchyma cells without any cell wall thickening were analysed. Additionally, the abundance of AM fungi was assessed in 15 random root segments 1 cm in length and isolated from the roots of two distal orders. These segments were macerated in KOH for 1 hour, then coloured with aniline blue and used to make squash preparations. For each segment, five fields of view were inspected with a Leica DM 5000 microscope (Leica, Germany) at 100x magnification to measure the proportion of the field of view covered by (1) AM hyphae; (2) arbuscles; (3) vesicles; (4) dark septate endophytes (DSE); and (5) root hairs.

Statistical analysis was carried out using the package STATISTICA 8.0 with three-factors ANOVA. In all cases, individual plants were used as experimental units.

3. Results

In this study, we analysed the influence of three main factors: invasive status (invasive/native), plant family (Sapindaceae/Rosaceae) and sampling site. The common feature of all absorbing roots of the studied species was a high mean proportion of the cortex, 95–96%, and a small mean diameter of the central cylinder, 60–76 μm. A high proportion of the cortex is probably needed for the interaction with fungal symbionts since all the species were mycorrhizal.

The number of cortex parenchyma cell layers depended on plant family: the roots of Rosaceae plants usually had two layers of parenchyma cells while the roots of Acer sp. had two or three layers. It is worth noting that the roots of A. negundo had three cell layers significantly more frequently, but not more than 8% overall.

The abundance of AM fungi, DSE and root hairs differed depending on the site; root hair abundance in Sapindaceae species was significantly higher, which could be a family-specific trait. No clear association between invasive status and AM abundance was found, except for a higher abundance of AM hyphae, vesicles and arbuscles in the roots of the invasive species A. negundo (15–75% in different sites) compared with the native A. platanoides (11–35%). A. spicata and S. aucuparia had a similar AM abundance, but in A. spicata this feature differed more strongly between sampling sites. The fact that the abundance of AM fungi depends on the site rather than other factors is in line with the current conception of symbiosis as a tool that allows the fine tuning of absorbing roots to function in specific soil conditions [15].

Root diameter varied depending on the site and plant family but was greater in the species of Sapindaceae (Figure 1). Most importantly, the roots of invasive species were thicker by 10%, mainly due to larger cortex parenchyma cells (Figure 1), and partly due to a larger number of cell layers in A. negundo. The ANOVA interactions of the `invasive status' factor together with `plant family' or `sampling site' were not significant for this parameter (Table 1).

Table 1

ANOVA F-values for several parameters of absorbing roots calculated for the three main factors and their interactions.


Parameter Factor Factor Interactions R 2adj
Invasive Status ( dF = 1) [1] Plant Family ( dF = 1) [2] Sampling Site [3] [1] × [2] [1] × [3] [2] × [3]
Root diameter § 7.65 ** 12.76 *** 17.96 *** 0.41 0.30 15.00 *** 0.54
Central cylinder diameter § 3.84 0.06 1.97 0.05 0.01 4.44 * 0.10
Cortex parenchyma thickness § 13.65 *** 6.46 * 14.05 *** 0.05 0.27 4.11 0.44
Number of cell layers § 7.49 * 60.28 *** 6.85 * 1.79 0.11 6.05 * 0.66
Cell diameter § 5.51 * 2.49 5.95 * 1.51 0.16 0.71 0.24
Abundance of AM hyphae §§ 3.66 2.50 41.60 *** 1.93 2.39 2.99 0.61
Arbuscles §§ 0.39 5.84 * 37.24 *** 0.44 1.33 4.20 0.59
Vesicles §§ 2.58 0.35 8.94 *** 0.87 4.55 * 0.01 0.28
DSE §§ 1.49 0.04 7.33 ** 0.01 3.80 * 4.79 * 0.39
Root hairs §§ 1.81 15.88 *** 3.88 * 0.79 1.06 2.30 0.36
Source: Authors' own work.
Note: # dF = 1 for root diameter, central cylinder diameter and parameters of the cortex parenchyma; dF = 2 for the other parameters. The following transformations were made for ANOVA: § x' = ln (x + 1); §§ x' = asin (sqrt (x)). Statistical significance of F-values: * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001. F-values for the interaction of all three factors are not shown. R 2adj R 2 adjusted for the full ANOVA model.
Figure 1

Comparison of the studied features of absorbing roots between invasive and native species of Sapindaceae ( ) and Rosaceae ( ) families. Mean values and standard errors are shown. Source: Authors' own work.

fig-1.jpg

Thus, the absorbing roots of two invasive and two native species that are both taxonomically and ecologically related differed in root diameter, the thickness of the root cortex parenchyma and parenchyma cell diameter. Invasive A. negundo and A. spicata had thicker roots with a thicker parenchyma formed by larger cells. These results are supported by the fact that A. negundo has thicker roots compared to the native Acer species in the Southern Urals [15]; a similar pattern has been shown for the invasive species Heracleum sosnowskyi [14,15]. However, our results do not correspond with the previous studies showing the same or thinner roots [10–12] or a higher SRL [8] in invasive plants. We found that roots with more parenchyma cell layers (three vs two) were significantly more frequent in invasive A. negundo than in native A. platanoides: however, since this frequency did not exceed 8%, we cannot claim that invasive and native plants significantly differ in the metabolic cost of root growth. Although we did our best to reduce all the effects of the choice of samples and methods, the data are still insufficient to make any clear conclusion.

The question is how a thicker cortex parenchyma with larger cells would contribute to invasion success. We think that large parenchyma cells with a large central vacuole could optimize their water and nutrient uptake by substantially reducing cell respiration [5]. Moreover, the presence of large intercellular spaces in such parenchyma tissue could be an additional factor minimizing root respiration. The positive correlation between the size of parenchyma cells and growth rate seems to be universal, as it has been shown for photosynthetic tissues of fast-growing plants as well [2].

4. Conclusion

Our results suggest that the same or even lower thickness of the absorbing roots of invasive plants, shown previously might be inferred while comparing an integral value such as SRL; also, the plants studied differed not only in invasive status but also in their taxonomic position or habitat. When we compared both taxonomically and ecologically close species using a directly measured value, the diameter of absorbing roots with primary development, the roots of invasive plants turned out to have a thicker cortex parenchyma with larger cells. We suggest that this could contribute to invasion success by reducing root respiration, but data proving a higher growth rate in the roots of invasive species are still insufficient.

Acknowledgement

The authors are grateful to Dr L. A. Ivanova (Botanical Garden, Ural Branch of RAS, Ekaterinburg, Russia) for her valuable comments.

Funding

The part of the project headed by Dr Anna Betekhtina was supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation within the framework of the state assignment No. 6.7696.2017/8.9. The part headed by Dr Denis Veselkin was performed within the State Contract of the Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, UB RAS.

References

1 

van Kleunen, M., Weber, E., and Fischer, M. (2010). A metaanalysis of trait differences between invasive and noninvasive plant species. Ecology Letters, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 235–245.

2 

Pyankov, V. I., Ivanova, L. A., and Lambers, H. (1998). Quantitative anatomy of photosynthetic tissues of plants species of different functional types in a boreal vegetation, in Inherent Variation in Plant Growth. Physiological Mechanisms and Ecological Consequences, pp. 71–87. Leiden: Backhuys Publishers.

3 

Semchenko, M., Lepik, A., Abakumova, M., et al. (2017). Different sets of belowground traits predict the ability of plant species to suppress and tolerate their competitors. Plant and Soil, vol. 424, no. 1–2, pp. 157–169.

4 

Eissenstat, D. M., Wells, C. E., Yanai, R. D., et al. (2000). Whitbeck, building roots in a changing environment: Implications for root longevity. New Phytologist, vol. 147, no. 1, pp. 33–42.

5 

Lynch, J. P., Chimungu, J. G., and Brown, K. M. (2014). Root anatomical phenes associated with water acquisition from drying soil: Targets for crop improvement. Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 65, no. 21, pp. 6155–6166.

6 

McCormack, L. M., Adams, T. S., Smithwick, E. A., et al. (2012). Predicting fine root lifespan from plant functional traits in temperate trees. New Phytologist, vol. 195, no. 4, pp. 823–831.

7 

Comas, L. H. and Eissenstat, D. M. (2004). Linking fine root traits to maximum potential growth rate among 11 mature temperate tree species. Functional Ecology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 388–397.

8 

Jo, I., Fridley, J. D., and Frank, D. A. (2017). Invasive plants accelerate nitrogen cycling: Evidence from experimental woody monocultures. Journal of Ecology, vol. 105, pp. 1105–1110.

9 

Ostonen, I., Püttsepp, Ü., Biel, C, et al. (2007). Specific root length as an indicator of environmental change. Plant Biosystems, vol. 141, no. 3, pp. 426–442.

10 

Craine, J. M. and Lee, W. G. (2003). Covariation in leaf and root traits for native and non-native grasses along an altitudinal gradient in New Zealand. Oecologia, vol. 134, no. 4, pp. 471–478.

11 

Keser, L. H., Visser, E. J., Dawson, W., et al. (2015). Herbaceous plant species invading natural areas tend to have stronger adaptive root foraging than other naturalized species. Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 6, no. 273.

12 

Smith, M. S., Fridley, J. D., Goebel, M., et al. (2014). Links between belowground and aboveground resource-related traits reveal species growth strategies that promote invasive advantages. PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 8.

13 

Betekhtina, A. A., Sergienko, A. O., and Veselkin, D. V. (2018). Root structure indicates the ability of Heracleum sosnowskyi to Absorb resources quickly under optimum soil conditions. Biology Bulletin, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 247–254.

14 

Veselkin, D. V., Ivanova, L. A., Ivanov, L. A., et al. (2017). Rapid use of resources as a basis of the Heracleum sosnowskyi invasive syndrome. Proceedings Biological Sciences, vol. 473, pp. 53–56.

15 

Veselkin, D. V., P'yankov, S. V., Safonov, M. A., et al. (2017). The structure of absorbing roots in invasive and native maple species. Russian Journal of Ecology, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 303–310.

16 

Delivering alien invasive species inventories for Europe (DAISIE), www.europe-aliens.org.

17 

Vinogradova, Yu. K., Mayorov, S. R., and Khorun, L. V. (2010). The Black Data Book of Flora of Central Russia: Alien Species of Plants in the Ecosystems of Central Russia. Moscow: GEOS.

18 

Tretyakova, A. S. (2011). Invasive potential of adventive plant species of the Central Urals. Russian Journal of Biological Invasions, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 281–285.

FULL TEXT

Statistics

  • Downloads 0
  • Views 34

Navigation

Refbacks



ISSN: 2413-0877