Download fulltext HTML
Mayasari, P., Ramdhan, D. H., & Uli, R. (2018). Relationship between Fatigue and Work Performance of XYZ Employees in 2017. KnE Life Sciences, 4(5), 174–180. https://doi.org/10.18502/kls.v4i5.2550

https://doi.org/10.18502/kls.v4i5.2550

statistics

  • 1203 Abstract Views
  • 1177 PDF Views
  • 0 HTML Views

authors

  • P Mayasari
    No author data available.
  • D H Ramdhan
    No author data available.
  • R Uli
    No author data available.

Published Date

  • Jun 19, 2018

Relationship between Fatigue and Work Performance of XYZ Employees in 2017

KnE Life Sciences / International Conference of Occupational Health and Safety (ICOHS 2017) / Pages 174–180

Abstract

Fatigue can adversely affect safety, health, work performance, and worker productivity, and it can occur if there are risk factors in the workplace, such as monotony, workload level, and long hours, which can take a toll physically and mentally. XYZ is a government agency that educates and trains personnel in human resources in the field of quality testing of goods. In carrying out its duties, XYZ organizes programming and evaluation of employees through education/training, as well as the implementation of standard training, promotion, cooperation of education, and administrative and household affairs. Annually, XYZ organizes more than 25 training events, in which the training duration varies. The many activities that XYZ carries out encourage employees to work hard, including long hours, which can elicit fatigue. This analytical study, using a cross-sectional design, aims to analyze the relationship between fatigue and employee performance at
XYZ. Fatigue was measured in 22 XYZ employees in May 2017 by using the Fatigue Assessment Scale, and the data were analyzed with a correlation test. The results indicated a statistically significant relationship between fatigue and work performance (r = -0.771 and p = 0.0005) – a very strong and inversely proportional relationship
in which the higher the fatigue experienced by XYZ employees, the more their work-performance quality suffered.



Keywords: fatigue, work performance, cross-sectional, FAS

References
[1] Lim SM, Chia SE. The prevalence of fatigue and associated health and safety risk factors among taxi drivers in Singapore. 2015;56(2):92–7.


[2] Gross S, Semmer NK, Meier LL, Kälin W, Jacobshagen N, Tschan F. The effect of positive events at work on after-work fatigue: They matter most in face of adversity. J Appl Psychol [Internet]. 2011;96(3):654–64.


[3] Abd-Elfattah HM, Abdelazeim FH, Elshennawy S. Physical and cognitive consequences of fatigue: A review. J Adv Res [Internet]. 2015;6(3):351–8.


[4] Sprigg et al. Work Characteristics, Musculoskeletal Disorders, and the Mediating Role of Psychological Strain: A Study of Call Center Employees. J Appl Psychol [Internet]. 2007;92(5):1456–66.


[5] Hallowell MR. Worker Fatigue. Prof Saf. 2010;18–26.


[6] Tanaka M. Effects of Mental Fatigue on Brain Activity and Cognitive Performance: A Magnetoencephalography Study. Anat Physiol [Internet]. 2015;s4:0–4.


[7] Michielsen et al. Psychometric qualities of a brief self-rated fatigue measure: The Fatigue Assessment Scale. J Psychosom Res. 2003;54(4):345–52.


[8] Jian Ai Yeow, Poh Kiat Ng TSC and WYL. Effects of Stress , Repetition , Fatigue and Work Environment on Human Error in Manufacturing Industries. 2014.


[9] Fekry Ahmed M, Fathi Sleem W, Hassan Kassem A. Effect of working condition and fatigue on performance of staff nurses at Mansoura University Hospital. IOSR J Nurs Heal Sci [Internet]. 2015;4(3):2320–1940.