Untitled Download fulltext HTML
Nusantara, H. A., & Suharno, G. T. M. (2018). Development of Working Facility to Improve Work Posture at Packaging Section in Organic Vegetable Industry. KnE Life Sciences, 4(2), 65-81. https://doi.org/10.18502/kls.v4i2.1658

https://doi.org/10.18502/kls.v4i2.1658

statistics

  • 546 Abstract Views
  • 482 PDF Views
  • 0 HTML Views

authors

  • Herindra Adhi Nusantara

    Herindra Adhi Nusantara

    Department of Agro-Industrial Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Gadjah Mada University, Jl. Flora No.1 Bulaksumur 55281
  • Guntarti Tatik Mulyati Suharno

    Guntarti Tatik Mulyati Suharno

    Department of Agro-Industrial Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Gadjah Mada University, Jl. Flora No.1 Bulaksumur 55281

Published Date

  • Mar 1, 2018

Development of Working Facility to Improve Work Posture at Packaging Section in Organic Vegetable Industry

KnE Life Sciences / The 3rd International Conference on Agro-Industry 2016 “Competitive & Sustainable Agro-Industry" (3rd ICoA 2016) / Pages 65-81

Abstract

Working facilities may influence worker’s working posture. CV.Tani Organik Merapi (CV.TOM) is an organic vegetables company. The company provides ”dingklik” (footstool) for working. While working with “footstool”, workers must bend their legs with high bend degrees as well as their back. This poor working posture is caused by bad working facilities. It’s important to check the working posture to know whether the improvement of working facilities is needed or not. Ovako Working Analysis System (OWAS) was used to check the badness level of working posture in every CV.TOM’s working activities. It’s identified that packaging section has the worst working posture. Then it was decided to provide a new working facility to improve working posture in packaging section. CATIA V5 was used to design the new working facility. Three ergonomics tools were used to compare footstool” working posture with the new working facility. Those tools are Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA), Manual Task Risk Assessment (ManTRA), and Rodgers Muscle Fatigue Analysis (RMFA). It was found that the new working facility can substitute “dingklik” with lower posture score and safer.

 

Keywords: Ergonomics; Catia; Comfortability; Facility; Working posture

References
[1] Azadeh, Ali dan Mansour Zarrin. 2016. An Intelligent Framework for Productivity Assessment and Analysis of Human Resource from Resilience Engineering, Motivational Factors, HSE and Ergonomics Perspective. Safety Science Journal Volume 89 page 55-71.

[2] Endang, Widuri Asih dan Titin Isna Oesman. 2011. Providing Ergonomics Working for Improving Worker’s Productivity at Mozaik Industry. Proceeding 11th National Conference of Indonesian Ergonomics Society 2011. ISSN : 2088-9488.

[3] Esquivel, J.C. Rodriguez, et al. 2014. Gestures for Interaction Between Software CATIA and The Human via Microsoft Kinect. HCII 2014 Posters, Part I, CCIS 434, page 457-462. Springer International Publishing Switzerland.

[4] Grandjean, E. 1993. Fitting The Task to The Man 4th edition. Taylor and Francis Incorporate. London.

[5] Helander, M. 2006. A Guide to Human Factors and Engineering. Taylor and Francis Group. Florida.

[6] Jaffar, N, H. Abdul Tarim, Mohd. Kamar, dan N.S. Lop. 2011. A Literature Review of Ergonomics Risk Factors in Construction Industry. The 2nd International Building Control Conference 2011.

[7] Kuswana, Wowo Sunaryo. 2014. Ergonomics and K3. Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

[8] Limerick, Burgess, L. Stalker, C. Pollock, dan R. Egeskov. 2004. Further Risk Assessment Methods for Hazardous Manual Tasks. Minerals Industry Safety and Health Centre, The University of Queensland.

[9] Rodgers, Suzanne H. 1992. A Functional Job Evaluation Technique in Ergonomics. Occupational Medicine Journal : State of the Art Review. Volume 7 page 679-711.

[10] Schmidt, Robert F. dan Gerald F. Gebhart. 2013. Encyclopedia of Pain. Springer. New York.

[11] Suma’mur. 2009. The Hygiene of Safety Work Industry. Jakarta : Sagung Seto.

[12] Sutalaksana, LZ. Anggawisastra R, dan Tjakraatmadja, J.H. 1979. Technique of Working. Department of Industries Technique, ITB. Bandung.

[13] Triyanto, Budi. 2012. Working Posture Analysis Using RULA Method and Redesign The “Finishing” Batik Working Station. Teknik Industri UMS Journal.

[14] Veselinovic, Sonja Pavlovic, Alan Hedge, dan Matija Veselinovic. 2016. An Ergonomic Expert System for Risk Assessment of Work-Related Musculo- skeletal Disorders. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics Volume 53 page 130-139.

[15] Wahyudi, M. Arip et al. 2015. Work Posture Analysis of Manual Material Handling Using OWAS Method. International Conference on Agro-Industry (ICoA) page 195- 199.

[16] Widjanarko. 2015. Choosing The Plastic Lead Cutting Machine with Quality Function Deployment (QFD) Method and Value Engineering (VE). ROTOR Journal Volume 8 No. 1 2015.

[17] Zhou, Dong, Jiayu Chen, Chuan Lv, dan Qingyuan Cao, 2016. A Method for Integrating Ergonomics Analysis into Maintability Design in A Virtual Environment. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics Volume 54 page 154-163.